court filing: 2018-00290
Summary
The document is a court filing opposing the plaintiff's request to take more than the presumptive limit of 10 depositions, arguing that the request is premature and that the plaintiff has not justified the need for additional depositions under Rule 26(b)(2) standards.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court filing: 28509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
court filing or legal document: 20-20033-PAE
The document discusses Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement, which included a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment and immunity for certain co-conspirators. It also outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, including conspiracy and sex trafficking. The document provides insight into the legal proceedings against Epstein and Maxwell.
Court Filing: #281849/clw
The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indicating that they had provided answers to interrogatories propounded by Epstein's legal team on January 16, 2009. The notice was filed by attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill on February 13, 2009. The document is subject to a protective order.
Court Filing - Complaint: 08-80069
The complaint is filed by Jane Doe No. 1, a minor, through her father as parent and natural guardian, and by her father and stepmother individually, against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse. The plaintiffs are all residents of Florida, and the case is brought in the Southern District of Florida. The complaint is filed under fictitious names to protect Jane Doe's identity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations.
Court Filing: 20-10495
The plaintiff's attorney, David Boies, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay discovery is unwarranted and should be denied. Boies contends that Maxwell's motion to dismiss is not strong and that the court has previously stated that dispositive motions do not typically stay discovery. The plaintiff requests that the court deny Maxwell's anticipated motion to stay discovery.
Court Filing: 23509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.