The document is a court filing requesting that the court unseal the defendant's motion for a new tri...
Summary
The document is a court filing requesting that the court unseal the defendant's motion for a new trial and juror questionnaires, citing the importance of public scrutiny in maintaining the integrity of criminal trials. The filing also asks the court to ensure that subsequent related documents are filed without sealing, with necessary redactions to protect juror safety and identities. The request is submitted by David E. McCraw on behalf of the petitioner.
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 20-2000308
The document is a court filing requesting that the court unseal the defendant's motion for a new trial and juror questionnaires, citing the importance of public scrutiny in maintaining the integrity of criminal trials. The filing also asks the court to ensure that subsequent related documents are filed without sealing, with necessary redactions to protect juror safety and identities. The request is submitted by David E. McCraw on behalf of the petitioner.
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous denial and distinguishing the defendant's case from other high-profile cases where bail was granted. The court had previously found the defendant to have significant foreign connections and a history of hiding resources.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous consideration and rejection of similar precedent. The court had distinguished the defendant's case from others due to her significant foreign connections and financial sophistication.
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to...
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to the defense's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, citing the need to protect third-party privacy interests. The Court granted the request, ordering the Defendant and Boies Schiller to docket the documents with the proposed redactions.
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defen...
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defendant's memorandum and seeking to file certain exhibits under seal to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties. The proposed redactions are justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government is submitting proposed redactions to the Court by email.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.