Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-728House OversightLegal Filing

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, arguing that the NPA betwee...

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, arguing that the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution. The court rejects this argument, holding that the NPA does not bind USAO-SDNY. The court reviews the denial of Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment de novo.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-728
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, arguing that the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution. The court rejects this argument, holding that the NPA does not bind USAO-SDNY. The court reviews the denial of Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment de novo.

Tags

Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and USAO-SDFLMaxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNYThird-party beneficiary rights under the NPA
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.