court filing: 28589
Summary
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit, arguing that the additional depositions seek irrelevant and inadmissible evidence. Maxwell contends that the case is a simple defamation claim and that the plaintiff's attempts to introduce evidence about other alleged victims and Epstein's organization are extraneous and should not be allowed.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: Case 1:20-cv-00803-RP Document 122-20 Filed 06/04/21 Page 63 of 8
Ms. Maxwell requests the court to order the Plaintiff to disclose information about alleged ongoing criminal investigations or stay the proceedings. The Plaintiff has represented that she is part of an ongoing investigation involving Ms. Maxwell, but Ms. Maxwell is unaware of any such investigation. The Defendant's counsel has attempted to verify the existence of the investigation with the Assistant United States Attorney.
court filing: 1:20-cv-02484-DG
The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal case, citing concerns about the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The plaintiff argues that a stay would cause her harm due to ongoing effects of alleged abuse. The court weighs the interests of both parties in considering the request.
court filing: 28509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
Court Filing: 2:20-cv-00839-JES-MRM
The document discusses the defendant's motion to compel the plaintiff to provide discovery information or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery obligations. The plaintiff is claiming a non-existent 'investigative privilege' related to an alleged ongoing criminal investigation. The defendant argues that the information is necessary for adequate preparation for the plaintiff's deposition and other discovery matters.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [EFTA00008874]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. SEALED INDICTMENT 20 Cr. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The charges set forth herein stem from the ro...
GRAND JURY_, [EFTA00008892]
GRAND JURY_, EXHIBIT United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell June 29, 2020 Grand Jury Presentation GNI_GLSDNY_00000364 GM_OLSDNY_00000365 9 East 71St Street, New York, New York GM_OLSDNY_00000366 358 El Brillo W , Palm Beach, Florida GM_G,S.Y,ON)0367 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico GM_GLSDNY_...
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.