Court Opinion: 310-1
Summary
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorney's 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby should be enforced, given that it led to Cosby's incriminating testimony in a civil deposition. The court ultimately decided that the decision not to prosecute must be enforced, which disposed of the appeal.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 310
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, drawing parallels between Maxwell's case and the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby, arguing that the government reneged on its promise not to prosecute Maxwell, similar to the Cosby case. The letter requests the court to consider this new precedent in deciding on the pending motion to dismiss certain counts of the indictment against Maxwell.
Court Filing: 20-cr-330-AJN Document 11202 Filed 03/23/21 Page 6 of 18
The document discusses the proposed bail conditions for Ghislaine Maxwell, including the imposition of a monitor to supervise her assets. Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. has been proposed as the asset monitor. The government opposes this proposal, citing concerns about Maxwell's candor.
Court Filing - Restitution Calculation: A-6043
The document is a restitution calculation for 23 clients of Jenkins and Gilchrist, detailing tax benefits taken, tax deficiencies, and interest accrued. The total tax deficiency for all clients is $110,520,308, with total interest of $121,140,226. The document appears to be a supporting document for a court case, likely related to tax evasion or fraud.
Court Filing: #281849/clw
The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indicating that they had provided answers to interrogatories propounded by Epstein's legal team on January 16, 2009. The notice was filed by attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill on February 13, 2009. The document is subject to a protective order.
Court Filing: 10
The document is a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, scheduled as a remote video conference due to COVID-19. It outlines the court's protocols for the proceeding, including COVID-19 safety measures and logistical arrangements. The filing also references related cases involving Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filing: 100
The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, arguing that she remains a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, strong evidence against her, and her financial resources and foreign ties. The court had previously denied bail after a thorough hearing, and the government contends that Maxwell's new bail package does not alter the court's prior finding.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.