Court Filing - Motion in Limine: 390
Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to exclude Government Exhibit 52, a 97-page document compilation, due to concerns over its authenticity, hearsay nature, and potential prejudice. The document's provenance is tied to a bribery scheme involving former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Motion in Limine: 445
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to exclude Government Exhibit 52, a 97-page document compilation, due to concerns over its authenticity, hearsay nature, and potential prejudice. The document surfaced in 2009 as part of a bribery scheme involving former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 490
The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address book allegedly belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, is not authentic and should not be admitted as evidence without proper authentication. The defense contends that the book was altered by Alfredo Rodriguez, a former Epstein employee, and that the government's witness cannot verify its authenticity.
Court Filing - Exhibit: 148-5
This document is an exhibit filed in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, listing the defense's requests for documents related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement negotiations between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as communications between government agencies and attorneys for accusing witnesses. The requests cover a range of topics, including meetings between SDNY prosecutors and attorneys for accusing witnesses in 2016 and 2018.
Court Filing: 545
The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.
Court filing: Case1:20-cr-00320-AJN Document 272 Filed 07/02/20 Page 4 of 457
The document discusses public statements made by lawyers and government officials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, arguing that they violate Local Rule 23.1 by making presumptively prejudicial comments. It cites specific statements by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards. The document suggests that these statements could prejudice the case and potentially violate the rules governing pretrial publicity.
Epstein Black Book (Contact Directory) - Government Exhibit
A 97-page book of names, phone numbers, emails, and addresses taken from Epstein's Palm Beach residence by former house manager Alfredo Rodriguez in 2005. Rodriguez attempted to sell it to an attorney representing an Epstein victim and was later imprisoned for obstruction. The book contained over 1,500 contacts. A redacted version was published by Gawker in 2015; an unredacted version appeared online in 2019.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.