Court Filing - Motion: 393
Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony without proper disclosure and qualification under Federal Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure. The motion argues that the government should not be allowed to circumvent disclosure requirements and the court's gatekeeping role by presenting expert testimony from law enforcement officers as lay witnesses.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss: 124
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identify specific dates, accusers, or details of alleged crimes, and thus violates her constitutional rights. They request that Counts One through Four be dismissed or that the court direct the government to provide a Bill of Particulars.
Court Filing - Memorandum of Law: 148
This memorandum of law supports Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a bill of particulars and pretrial disclosures, requesting the court to order the government to provide specific information and evidence. The motion includes requests for disclosure of exculpatory and impeachment material under Brady and Giglio, as well as other evidentiary materials. The document is a key part of Maxwell's defense strategy in her criminal trial.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 171
This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her third motion for bail. The memorandum argues that the court retains jurisdiction to decide on bail despite a pending appeal and presents a comprehensive bail package with strict conditions. It also disputes the government's opposition to bail, particularly regarding the renunciation of Maxwell's foreign citizenship as a condition of release.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum of Law: 209
This is a reply memorandum of law in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss counts one through six of the superseding indictment due to pre-indictment delay. The defense argues that the government's delay has prejudiced Maxwell's ability to investigate and defend herself, and that the government's failure to provide adequate discovery has exacerbated this issue. The defense requests that the court defer consideration of the motion until after the government has produced all relevant discovery.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 287
Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that the court should grant her motion for a bill of particulars and pretrial disclosures due to the government's failure to provide sufficient information about the charges and witnesses. The government's opposition reveals new allegations not in the indictment, emphasizing the need for more disclosure.
Court Transcript: 767
The transcript records a court hearing on December 20, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan, where the prosecution and defense discussed trial logistics, including the redaction of sensitive materials and the timing of closing arguments. The court confirmed that all admitted exhibits had been docketed with tailored redactions and discussed the public availability of visual aids used during closing arguments. The hearing also touched on the timing and duration of the government's and defense's closing arguments.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.