Court Filing: 406
Summary
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where both parties present their positions on scheduling Daubert and Rule 412 hearings, and discuss issues related to expert testimony and disclosure.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (6)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 516
The court rules on the government's motion to partially preclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The court denies in part and grants in part the motion, allowing some of Dr. Dietz's opinions to be admitted while precluding others that may violate Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b).
Court Filing: 482
The court partially grants and denies the government's motion to preclude the testimony of two expert witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and orders the parties to propose redactions to certain documents and justify any requests for sealing by November 23, 2021.
Court Filing - Memorandum of Law: 424
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.
Court Filing - Summary Order: 104-1
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.
Court Filing: 109-1
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.
Court Filing: 1109-11
Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes. The District Court imposed concurrent prison terms of 60, 120, and 240 months. The appeal is before the United States Court of Appeals.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.