Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 516
Summary
The court rules on the government's motion to partially preclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The court denies in part and grants in part the motion, allowing some of Dr. Dietz's opinions to be admitted while precluding others that may violate Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b).
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 482
The court partially grants and denies the government's motion to preclude the testimony of two expert witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and orders the parties to propose redactions to certain documents and justify any requests for sealing by November 23, 2021.
Court Filing: 406
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where both parties present their positions on scheduling Daubert and Rule 412 hearings, and discuss issues related to expert testimony and disclosure.
Court Filing: 41114
The government moved for reconsideration of the court's order setting a deadline for filing motions to exclude defense expert witnesses. The court granted the motion in part, extending the deadline for certain witnesses, while denying it for others, specifically Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus.
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 435
The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, and finds her testimony admissible with one exception. The court concludes that Dr. Rocchio is qualified as an expert and her methods are reliable and well-accepted in her profession. The court's decision is based on the Daubert standard and Federal Rule of Evidence 702.
Court Transcript: 782
The transcript records a pretrial conference in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, where the court discusses logistical issues, motions in limine, and schedules future hearings. The court also begins a Daubert hearing regarding the government's proposed expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio.
Court Filing - Opinion and Order: 106
The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, concluding that she poses a risk of flight and that no combination of conditions can ensure her appearance. The decision is based on the serious charges against her, the strength of the government's evidence, and her substantial resources and foreign ties. The court had previously denied bail on July 14, 2020, and Maxwell did not appeal that decision.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.