Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-7582Court UnsealedCorrespondence

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 429

The defense attorney argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released from pretrial detention as she is not a flight risk, has been detained for an extended period, and faces challenging conditions that impede her ability to prepare for trial. The letter highlights new evidence that undermines the government's case and compares Maxwell's treatment unfavorably to other defendants like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 429
Pages
2
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense attorney argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released from pretrial detention as she is not a flight risk, has been detained for an extended period, and faces challenging conditions that impede her ability to prepare for trial. The letter highlights new evidence that undermines the government's case and compares Maxwell's treatment unfavorably to other defendants like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeSep 29, 2025

Ghislaine Maxwell Supreme Court petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

159p
Dept. of JusticeDec 15, 2020

Ghislaine Maxwell renewed bail application

Case 1:20—€r—00330—AIN Document 97. Filed 22420 Page 1.of45 unten states nistic court sourneRN pismicr or New york unimen states or america, : 2006330 (any omsiane maxwel, Defendant nommmmmmnmemnmmmenemmmennnmnt wiEvoranbum or omstaine maxwerr in suprorer or ek revewep morion For ban, Mark S. Cohen Christin R. Everdel colleN & arESSER LLP $00 Third Avenue New York, NY tooz2 Phone: 212:957—7600 Jeffiy S. Paglnea Laura A Menninger waDbon, MORGAN & FREMAN RC. 150 Eas 10h Avenve Demer, C0 80203 Phon

45p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00023532

0p
Court UnsealedDepositionSep 17, 2024

Ghislaine Maxwell Appeal

22-1426-cr United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, – v. – GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ARTHUR L. AIDALA DIANA FABI SAMSON JOHN M. LEVENTHAL AIDALA BERTUNA & KAMINS PC Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant 546 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor New York, New Yor

113p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020

From: To: Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:36:04 +0000 Attachments: 0I -30-2020.pdf SDNY News Clips Thursday, January 30, 2020 EFTA00095957 Contents Public Corruption Avenatti Epstein Parnas Terrorism and International Narcotics Virgil Griffith White Plains Grogg Matters of Interest Weinstein Bolton Public Corruption Avenatti Avenatti didn't care about ruining teens' lives in Nike case, lawyer says NY Post By Ruth Weissmann 1/30/2020 Lightning-rod lawyer Michael Avenatti was allegedly so hellbent on extorting an eight-figure sum from Nike that he didn't care who got hurt — including teenage basketball players, a witness testified Thursday. In his second day of testimony in Manhattan federal court, Nike attorney Scott Wilson recounted the "Twilight Zone" meetings in which Avenatti allegedly tried to extort the company for $20 million under threat of exposing purported corruption in youth basketball linked t

10p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.