Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-7740Court UnsealedLegal Filing

Court Filing: 528

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 528
Pages
8
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 545

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.

9p
Dept. of JusticeNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Palm-Beach

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

139p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Letter to the Judge: 731-2

The letter, written by Jane's attorneys, opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to solicit testimony from Robert Glassman, arguing that it would disclose confidential information and is not relevant to the case. The attorneys request that the court deny Maxwell's motion to compel Glassman's testimony.

3p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 541

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

2p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 731-1

The letter, written by Kevin Boyle on behalf of witness Jane, argues that Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, should not be compelled to testify about his conversations with Jane because it would violate attorney-client privilege and be irrelevant to the case. The letter also argues that the subpoena served on Glassman was procedurally improper.

14p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Mixed court documents: 544

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.