Skip to content
Case File
d-7816Court UnsealedLegal Filing

Court Filing: 581

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 581
Pages
5
Persons
5

Summary

The Miami Herald and investigative journalist Julie Brown are seeking to intervene in the case United States v. Maxwell to object to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial being filed under seal. They argue that the motion and exhibits are judicial records entitled to a presumption of public access and that sealing them is not justified.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Summary Order: 104-1

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.

4p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 109-1

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.

26p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 1109-11

Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes. The District Court imposed concurrent prison terms of 60, 120, and 240 months. The appeal is before the United States Court of Appeals.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 121-2

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her claims that her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, that the indictment was untimely, and that the district court erred in handling her trial. The court held that Epstein's agreement did not bind the USAO-SDNY and that Maxwell's indictment was timely under 18 U.S.C. § 3283.

26p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 128

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 137

The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a notice of motion to dismiss counts one through six of the superseding indictment for pre-indictment delay, as well as correspondence regarding Maxwell's access to discovery materials while in confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center.

4p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.