Deposition transcript: 6161201
Summary
The document is a transcript of witness Conrad's deposition, where they are questioned about their conduct, rationality, and interactions with Judge Pauley. Conrad testifies about their response to a subpoena and their understanding of their right to a lawyer. The deposition highlights Conrad's evasive and sometimes contradictory responses to questioning.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: A-5637
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Conrad is questioned about her alcohol consumption, court appearance, and behavior. She is asked to recall specific statements she made during a previous court appearance before Judge Pauley and to explain her comments about the judge's alma mater, Duke University.
deposition transcript: A-5640
The document is a transcript of Conrad's deposition testimony, where they are questioned about their conduct in rejecting a subpoena, their medication, and their understanding of their rights during a hearing with Judge Pauley. Conrad's responses suggest a lack of clarity or cooperation, and the questioning attorney presses for specific details about their interactions with the judge and their financial situation.
deposition transcript: A-5643
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness named Conrad is being questioned about their understanding of a judge's inquiry regarding their finances and the appointment of a lawyer. The witness confirms understanding the connection between the two topics. The transcript is part of a larger legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas in the United States of America.
Deposition transcript: A-5644
The document is a transcript of Ms. Conrad's deposition testimony, where she is questioned about her financial situation, her previous statements to the court, and her interactions with Judge Pauley during voir dire. The testimony reveals potential inconsistencies in her statements and highlights her financial situation and relationship with her husband, a convicted felon.
Deposition Transcript: Case 1:20-cv-00338-PLA Document 616-201 Filed 02/24/22 Page 39 of 67
The document is a deposition transcript of a witness, Conrad, being questioned about her court appearance and behavior. She is asked about her alcohol consumption and its potential impact on her testimony. Conrad's responses are often evasive or uncooperative, leading to objections and clarifications from the court reporter and counsel.
court transcript: 1:20-cv-300380-PAE
The transcript records the cross-examination of Juror Conrad, who is questioned about her residence and potential misrepresentation during voir dire. Conrad admits to having two addresses, one in the Bronx and one in Westchester, and is challenged about her initial statement that she resided in Bronxville. The questioning also touches on her husband's criminal history and her father's role as an immigration judge.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.