court filing: 701
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.
Summary
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Maxwell experts
November 8, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Pursuant to the Court’s order (Dkt. No. 409), attached is Exhibit A to Dkt. No. 406 with the proposed redactions implemented. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew
Court Filing: 715
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen Flatley, arguing that it was untimely and should be precluded. The government had previously claimed Flatley would only offer fact testimony, but the defense argues that the November 26, December 3, and December 5 disclosures reveal expert opinion testimony.
Court Filing: 199
The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the superseding indictment. The government explains the timing of the superseding indictment and argues that it was not delayed for strategic advantage. The government also addresses the potential impact on the trial length and proposes measures to mitigate any delays.
Court Filing: 407
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.
Court filings: 8
The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.
Court filing - Letter to the Judge: 362
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 17 news media organizations urge the court to deny Ghislaine Maxwell's request to file the juror questionnaire and voir dire under seal, citing the First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings and the presumption of openness in voir dire.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.