Skip to content
Case File
d-799House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, responding to the ...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-799
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, responding to the court's order regarding the use of flashlights in security checks at MDC and detailing Maxwell's detention conditions and access to counsel. It describes the procedures followed by MDC staff, including flashlight checks, pat-down searches, and access to discovery materials and counsel. The document also includes information from the French Ministry of Justice regarding extradition procedures.

Tags

Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditionsUse of flashlights in security checks at MDCAccess to counsel and discovery materials
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing by the Acting United States Attorney, expressing concerns about Ghisl...

The document is a court filing by the Acting United States Attorney, expressing concerns about Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at MDC, including excessive searching despite 24/7 surveillance. The filing requests Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting to the Court regarding Maxwell's specialized detention.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document details the harsh conditions and excessive surveillance faced by Ghislaine Maxwell duri...

The document details the harsh conditions and excessive surveillance faced by Ghislaine Maxwell during her detention, including allegations of mistreatment by MDC staff and monitoring of her communications. It argues that Maxwell's detention conditions are not justified by the risks posited by the MDC. The document invites the court and government to review Maxwell's monitored communications to evidence her strong ties to the United States and intention to establish her innocence at trial.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a ...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction fo...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction an...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her claims that her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, that the indictment was untimely, and that the district court erred in handling her trial. The court held that Epstein's agreement did not bind the USAO-SDNY and that Maxwell's indictment was timely under 18 U.S.C. § 3283.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.