Court Filing: 715
Summary
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen Flatley, arguing that it was untimely and should be precluded. The government had previously claimed Flatley would only offer fact testimony, but the defense argues that the November 26, December 3, and December 5 disclosures reveal expert opinion testimony.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Related Documents (6)
Maxwell experts
November 8, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Pursuant to the Court’s order (Dkt. No. 409), attached is Exhibit A to Dkt. No. 406 with the proposed redactions implemented. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew
EFTA Document EFTA01658979
Court Filing: 331
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, responding to the government's letter dated August 18, 2021. The defense argues that the government is attempting to reconsider previous court orders regarding the disclosure of co-conspirators' identities and statements, and urges the court to confirm its previous orders.
Court Filing - Notice of Electronic Filing: 21-2
The document is a notice of electronic filing from the US District Court, Southern District of New York, indicating that the appeal record in USA v. Maxwell has been transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. It includes details about the case, the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, and the attorneys involved. The case involves charges of conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, among others.
Court Transcript: 613-2
The transcript records the voir dire examination of Juror No. 50 in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The judge and attorneys question the juror about their background, exposure to media, and potential biases. The juror answers that they have heard of Maxwell and Epstein through news reports but claims to be able to remain impartial.
Court Transcript: 536
The transcript records a pre-trial conference where the prosecution and defense discuss outstanding issues, including cross-examination topics and defense subpoenas. The judge, Alison J. Nathan, oversees the discussion and provides guidance on resolving disputes. The conference touches on the upcoming jury selection and trial preparations.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.