Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 719
Summary
The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impeachment evidence against Kate, a prosecution witness, as it contradicts her testimony about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's home in 1994. The prosecution is objecting to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that the defense failed to disclose it in a timely manner.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 555
The defense responds to the government's motion to preclude certain testimony by Alexander Hamilton, arguing that the testimony regarding Kate's statements to Hamilton is admissible to show Kate's bias and motive. The defense also requests permission for Hamilton to testify remotely via WebEx due to COVID-19.
Court Filing - Letter Motion: 120366003830
The letter is a reply in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order to allow her to disclose certain information to civil litigation under seal. The government opposes the request, claiming it will jeopardize an ongoing criminal investigation, but Maxwell's attorney argues that the government's arguments lack merit.
Letter to the Court: 120366003830-Adt. Doc.0812412530-Filing808908P20ePage01of03
The letter, submitted by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, proposes redactions to her Request to Modify Protective Order and Reply, and objects to the government's proposed redactions, arguing they go beyond what is required by the Protective Order.
Letter to the Judge: 370
The letter, written by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell's Omnibus Response has been filed temporarily under seal. The response will be refiled publicly with proposed redactions by October 29, 2021, along with a justification for those redactions.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 377
The letter is from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412. The motion is being filed under seal due to the Rule's requirements, and the defense will serve redacted copies to the alleged victims' counsel. The letter outlines the steps being taken to comply with the Rule.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 521
The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.