Court Filing: 721
Summary
The defense is requesting that the court preclude the government from cross-examining a witness, Mr. □, about a regulatory settlement agreement, arguing that it is irrelevant and inadmissible under Rules 608 and 403. The witness is a retired British Solicitor who will testify to authenticate documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's purchase of a property.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 722
The letter, filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, notifies the court and the government of the defendant's intention to present extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements made by witnesses Jane and Carolyn during their testimonies. The letter details specific inconsistencies between the witnesses' trial testimonies and their prior statements as recorded in 3500 materials.
Court Filing: 108
The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requested a two-week extension to file pretrial motions due to the large volume of discovery and COVID-19 related quarantine constraints. The government consented, and the court granted the request, adjusting the briefing schedule accordingly.
Court Filing: 12036600638
The document is a court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, where her defense counsel requests the court to modify a protective order to allow her to refer to and file under seal certain materials in related civil litigation. The government opposes this request, citing concerns about grand jury secrecy and ongoing investigations.
Court Filing: 128
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Court Filing: 241
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to the defense's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, citing the need to protect third-party privacy interests. The Court granted the request, ordering the Defendant and Boies Schiller to docket the documents with the proposed redactions.
Court Order: 264
The court received a letter from counsel for a non-party requesting anonymity for their client, an alleged victim of a sexual crime. The court forwarded the letter to the parties, received a response from the Government, and decided to file the letter under seal to protect the non-party's privacy interests.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.