Court Transcript: 782
Summary
The transcript records a pretrial conference in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, where the court discusses logistical issues, motions in limine, and schedules future hearings. The court also begins a Daubert hearing regarding the government's proposed expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: 467
The transcript records a pretrial conference where the judge and lawyers discuss the defendant's motions, the government's expert witness, and logistical arrangements for jury selection and trial. The judge outlines the plan for the Daubert hearing and other pretrial matters. The conference addresses the upcoming trial schedule and various procedural issues.
Court Transcript: 499-2
The transcript records a pretrial conference in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, where the court discusses logistical issues, including jury selection and scheduling, and addresses motions in limine and a Daubert hearing regarding expert testimony. The court also schedules future hearings and conferences.
Court Transcript: 459
The transcript details a pretrial conference where Judge Alison J. Nathan discusses jury selection procedures, including the use of a screening questionnaire and voir dire. The court outlines the process for administering the questionnaire and handling juror information.
Court Transcript: 465
The transcript records a pretrial conference in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, where the court addresses motions in limine, including the use of the term 'victim' and the government's request to refer to certain witnesses by pseudonyms. The court denies the defense's motion to preclude the term 'victim' and grants the government's motion to use pseudonyms for certain witnesses.
Court Transcript: 767
The transcript records a court hearing on December 20, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan, where the prosecution and defense discussed trial logistics, including the redaction of sensitive materials and the timing of closing arguments. The court confirmed that all admitted exhibits had been docketed with tailored redactions and discussed the public availability of visual aids used during closing arguments. The hearing also touched on the timing and duration of the government's and defense's closing arguments.
Court Filing: 128
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.