court filing: 9:08-cv-01389-KAM Document 209 Filed 07/06/2019 Page 3 of 20

The document argues that the petitioners lack Article III standing to pursue their claims under the CVRA, as they cannot demonstrate that their alleged injuries will be redressed by a favorable decision. The filing cites relevant case law to support its argument that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The petition is likely to be dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to satisfy the standing test.