Deposition transcript: A-5649
The transcript shows a juror, Conrad, being questioned about her responses during voir dire, particularly about her residence and ownership of a property. Conrad's answers suggest she may have been dishonest to appear more 'juror marketable.' The questioning highlights potential issues with the juror's credibility and the fairness of the trial.
Summary
The transcript shows a juror, Conrad, being questioned about her responses during voir dire, particularly about her residence and ownership of a property. Conrad's answers suggest she may have been dishonest to appear more 'juror marketable.' The questioning highlights potential issues with the juror's credibility and the fairness of the trial.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: A-5646
The transcript shows a juror, Ms. Conrad, being questioned about her residence and personal life. She initially claimed to reside in Bronxville, Westchester County, but later admitted to living on Barker Avenue in the Bronx. The questioning attorney is trying to establish that she was dishonest during voir dire and potentially biased.
Deposition transcript: C2FFDAU6
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Conrad, where she is questioned about a letter she wrote to Mr. Okula and statements she made to Judge Pauley. The questioning highlights potential contradictions between her statements and raises concerns about her credibility.
deposition transcript: A-5640
The document is a transcript of Conrad's deposition testimony, where they are questioned about their conduct in rejecting a subpoena, their medication, and their understanding of their rights during a hearing with Judge Pauley. Conrad's responses suggest a lack of clarity or cooperation, and the questioning attorney presses for specific details about their interactions with the judge and their financial situation.
Deposition transcript: A-5665
The document is a transcript of a juror's cross-examination and redirect examination in a federal trial. The juror, Ms. Conrad, is questioned about her motivations for serving on the jury, her understanding of the trial instructions, and potential biases or influences on her decision-making. The testimony reveals that Ms. Conrad was a suspended New York attorney at the time of the trial and had filed a petition for readmission to the bar just before the trial began.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cv-30033
The document is a deposition transcript where Ms. Conrad is being questioned about her financial situation and credibility. She is asked about her cash on hand, stocks, and bonds, as well as her tax filing history. The questioning attorney attempts to challenge her credibility and financial disclosure.
court transcript: 1:20-cv-300380-PAE
The transcript records the cross-examination of Juror Conrad, who is questioned about her residence and potential misrepresentation during voir dire. Conrad admits to having two addresses, one in the Bronx and one in Westchester, and is challenged about her initial statement that she resided in Bronxville. The questioning also touches on her husband's criminal history and her father's role as an immigration judge.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.