deposition transcript: A-5786
The witness is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer with a similar name. Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that they were the same person but after reviewing voir dire responses, found inconsistencies. The witness ultimately concluded that they were not the same person.
Summary
The witness is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer with a similar name. Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that they were the same person but after reviewing voir dire responses, found inconsistencies. The witness ultimately concluded that they were not the same person.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
Deposition transcript: A-5737
The witness recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein about Juror No. 1, speculating that she might be a suspended lawyer due to similarities between her voir dire responses and the juror note. They discussed the juror's background, including a personal injury suit, and initially downplayed the significance of the juror note.
Table of Contents
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01265841
deposition: A-5771
The deponent is questioned about a document containing various addresses, lawsuits, and household information, including the identification of Robert J. Conrad as a spouse. The testimony confirms details about the document's content and the deponent's understanding of it. The document appears to be a subject of inquiry in a legal proceeding.
EFTA00032938
THIRD AMENDMENT TO RESTATED TRUST
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01266350
EFTA00030632
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.