The document analyzes the Bail Reform Act and relevant case law, discussing the standards for pretri...
Summary
The document analyzes the Bail Reform Act and relevant case law, discussing the standards for pretrial detention and the rebuttable presumption that arises when a defendant is charged with certain offenses. The court considers the defendant's third motion for bail, arguing that new conditions and the strength of the government's case warrant reconsideration.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document discusses the defendant's third motion for release on bail, the government's opposition...
The document discusses the defendant's third motion for release on bail, the government's opposition, and the legal standards governing bail under the Eighth Amendment and the Bail Reform Act. The court considers its jurisdiction to grant the motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending. The court ultimately denies the defendant's motion without resolving the jurisdictional question.
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her fo...
The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her foreign citizenship as part of her bail package. The government argues that this offer does not mitigate the risk of flight and is of unclear validity. The court is being asked to consider whether the defendant's offer is sufficient to alter its prior bail determinations.
The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed un...
The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed under temporary seal due to sensitive information. The government is given two days to respond to the proposed redactions. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions an...
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions and some additional ones suggested by the government to protect sensitive information and third-party privacy. The court applies the Lugosch test to justify the redactions, and orders the defendant to file the redacted documents by February 5, 2021.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.