court transcript or deposition: A-5922
Summary
The document appears to be a court transcript where a lawyer is arguing that David Parse was aware of the true purpose of complex financial transactions, which was to generate tax losses. The lawyer references Carrie Yackee's testimony, who stated she was acting under Parse's instructions. The defense is arguing that it is implausible that the jury could not infer Parse's knowledge of the transactions' true purpose.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: A-5707
The document is a transcript of a deposition where an attorney, Brune, is being questioned about their representation of David Parse. Brune testifies about making strategic decisions on behalf of Parse and the trust Parse had in them and their firm. The questioning also touches on Brune's willingness to raise issues with the court.
deposition transcript: A-5765
Ms. Brune testifies about the potential misinterpretation of a brief due to its wording, and discusses the conviction and acquittal of David Parse, expressing her belief in the jury's impartial verdict on the acquitted charges.
deposition transcript: A-5792
The witness discusses their role in the trial preparation for David Parse, including their involvement in opening and closing statements, expert testimony, and witness preparation. They also testify about email exchanges related to Robert Conrad and their lack of involvement in voir dire.
deposition transcript: A-5816
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.
deposition: A-5817
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a note related to respondeat superior during the David Parse trial and reveals a personal friendship with Theresa Trzaskoma, the lawyer representing David Parse.
deposition: A-5824
Barry H. Berke testifies about his employment history, including his work as a partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel and his involvement in the trial of David Parse. He provides details about his background, including his time as a clerk, Federal Defender, and visiting associate professor at NYU. Berke confirms he was a lawyer in the courtroom during the trial of David Parse.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.