The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail pac...
Summary
The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package a...
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous denial and distinguishing the defendant's case from other high-profile cases where bail was granted. The court had previously found the defendant to have significant foreign connections and a history of hiding resources.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous consideration and rejection of similar precedent. The court had distinguished the defendant's case from others due to her significant foreign connections and financial sophistication.
The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production a...
The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production and the presumption of flight. The court considers various factors, including the defendant's financial conditions and family ties, in determining whether they pose a flight risk. Ultimately, the court weighs the presumption of flight against the defendant's rebuttal evidence.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.