court filing: Case 12030600320
Summary
The document discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's potential cooperation with authorities and the implications of her defense strategy. It also highlights violations of Rule 23.1 by David Boies, counsel for one of Maxwell's accusers, who made public comments about the case. The document suggests that Maxwell's defense may be seen as 'blame the victim' and could potentially enrage a jury.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Exhibit: 148-5
This document is an exhibit filed in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, listing the defense's requests for documents related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement negotiations between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as communications between government agencies and attorneys for accusing witnesses. The requests cover a range of topics, including meetings between SDNY prosecutors and attorneys for accusing witnesses in 2016 and 2018.
Court Filing - Notice of Appearance: 180
David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP files a Notice of Appearance as counsel for the law firm and the victims it represents in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The filing is dated March 26, 2021. Boies is a member in good standing of the bar of the Southern District of New York.
Court Filing: 183
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to a Rule 17(c) subpoena sought by Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that it is a 'fishing expedition' aimed at obtaining impeachment material and that the documents sought are not relevant or admissible. The law firm represents alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer.
Court Filing: 1920
The document appears to be a court filing in a case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing her alleged role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minor victims between 1994 and 1997. It describes the locations where the abuse occurred and Maxwell's actions in grooming and abusing the victims. The filing includes a photograph of Epstein's New York Residence.
Court Filing: 20-10495
The plaintiff's attorney, David Boies, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay discovery is unwarranted and should be denied. Boies contends that Maxwell's motion to dismiss is not strong and that the court has previously stated that dispositive motions do not typically stay discovery. The plaintiff requests that the court deny Maxwell's anticipated motion to stay discovery.
court filing: 3:20-cr-30600-AUN Document 172 Filed 07/08/20 Page 17 of 125
The document alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell enticed and groomed multiple minor girls to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein, starting in at least 1994. Maxwell befriended the victims, normalized sexual abuse, and was present during interactions between Epstein and the victims. Her presence helped put the victims at ease, facilitating the abuse.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.