court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00330-AJN Document 104 Filed 07/13/20 Page 9 of 36
Summary
The Government argues that the defendant should be detained pending trial due to the seriousness of the offenses and the risk of flight, citing the victims' fears and the strength of the evidence, which includes testimony from multiple victims who will describe how the defendant groomed them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 20-cr-60083-AJNT
The document argues that the defendant should be detained due to the seriousness of the offenses and the risk of flight. The government cites the victims' fears and the strength of the evidence, including testimony from multiple victims, as reasons to deny bail. The defendant faces up to 35 years of incarceration.
Court Filing: 2017-00330-AUN-DR
The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witnesses and documentary evidence corroborate the victims' accounts of interacting with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein. The government argues that this evidence strongly supports the victims' testimony. The defendant has filed a motion complaining about the volume of documentary evidence produced.
court filing: Case 1:20-cr60838 Document 1002
The government argues that the testimony of victims is strongly corroborated by documentary evidence and additional witnesses, establishing that the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein interacted with minor victims. The defendant has filed a renewed bail motion, which the government is opposing. The government's evidence is described as making the victims' accounts 'virtually indisputable'.
The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witn...
The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witnesses and documentary evidence corroborate the victims' accounts of interacting with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein. The government argues that this evidence strongly supports the victims' testimony. The defendant has filed a motion complaining about the volume of documentary evidence produced.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.