Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8543Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00383-PAC Document 855-1 Filed 03/22/21 Page 12 of 20

The document argues that it is constitutional to indict a defendant in one courthouse and try them in another within the same district, citing precedent and the COVID-19 pandemic as justification. The court is unpersuaded by Schulte's allegations challenging this practice. The document discusses the flexibility of venue requirements in the context of grand jury proceedings.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:17-cr-00383-pac document 855-1 filed 03/22/21 page 12 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that it is constitutional to indict a defendant in one courthouse and try them in another within the same district, citing precedent and the COVID-19 pandemic as justification. The court is unpersuaded by Schulte's allegations challenging this practice. The document discusses the flexibility of venue requirements in the context of grand jury proceedings.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:17-cr-00383-pac document 855-1 filed 03/22/21 page 12 of 20
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.