Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8561Court UnsealedCorrespondence

Legal Memorandum or Brief: Case 1:20-cr-00306-AJN Document 112 Filed 03/23/21 Page 2 of 18

The document argues that the Ministry's interpretation of extradition law is incorrect, citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It asserts that the nationality protection only applies to individuals who were French nationals at the time of the offense, not at the time of the extradition request. The analysis is based on a literal reading of the relevant provisions and case law.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:20-cr-00306-ajn document 112 filed 03/23/21 page 2 of 18
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that the Ministry's interpretation of extradition law is incorrect, citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It asserts that the nationality protection only applies to individuals who were French nationals at the time of the offense, not at the time of the extradition request. The analysis is based on a literal reading of the relevant provisions and case law.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:20-cr-00306-ajn document 112 filed 03/23/21 page 2 of 18
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.