Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8565Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: Case 1:20-cr-00320-AJN Document 462 Filed 08/21/20 Page 4 of 465

The document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow the use of criminal discovery materials in civil cases. The government cites case law and argues that there is no precedent for such a request and that it would blur the line between criminal and civil proceedings. The court is urged to deny the request due to the lack of authority supporting it and the potential impact on law enforcement interests.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:20-cr-00320-ajn document 462 filed 08/21/20 page 4 of 465
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow the use of criminal discovery materials in civil cases. The government cites case law and argues that there is no precedent for such a request and that it would blur the line between criminal and civil proceedings. The court is urged to deny the request due to the lack of authority supporting it and the potential impact on law enforcement interests.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:20-cr-00320-ajn document 462 filed 08/21/20 page 4 of 465
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court filing - Letter to the Judge: 362

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 17 news media organizations urge the court to deny Ghislaine Maxwell's request to file the juror questionnaire and voir dire under seal, citing the First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings and the presumption of openness in voir dire.

4p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 407

The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.

5p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016484

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filings: 8

The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.