deposition: Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 79 of 130
Summary
The witness, Brune, testifies about their involvement in preparing a letter dated July 21st and their recollection of events related to the waiver issue. Brune clarifies that they did not meet with Trzaskoma and Edelstein to prepare for the hearing, but had discussed the issues with them previously. The testimony highlights the witness's understanding of the significance of certain documents and emails.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.
deposition transcript: A-5710
The witness, Brune, testifies about their firm's handling of jury selection in a case, confirming that partner Trzaskoma was involved in gathering information about potential jurors and was supervised by Brune.
Deposition Transcript: A-5711
The witness, Brune, is questioned about the legal team assembled for a trial, including partners and associates, and their roles. The discussion also touches on communication during jury selection.
deposition transcript: A-5724
The witness, Brune, testifies about the methods used to investigate potential jurors, stating that they relied on sworn testimony during voir dire and did not conduct a full-scale private investigation. Brune also discusses the handling of juror information, including the use of middle initials to identify jurors.
deposition transcript: A-5727
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about the voir dire process in Judge Pauley's courtroom, specifically about the role of counsel in raising concerns and questions about potential jurors. The questioning highlights Ms. Trzaskoma's involvement in raising issues with potential jurors, including one who worked at Goldman Sachs. The document reveals the collaborative and transparent nature of the voir dire process in this case.
deposition transcript: A-5735
The witness, Brune, testifies that they were not included in email traffic related to Catherine Conrad and does not recall being made aware of it. The discussion involves a note that prompted additional research and a dispute about the timing of an email sent by Ms. Trzaskoma.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.