Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-8617Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing or legal brief: Case 1:20-cr-00830-PAE Document 178 Filed 03/27/24 Page 16 of 26

The document argues that the PROTECT Act's amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 applies to the defendant's conduct, even though it occurred before the amendment was enacted, because the statutory text clearly intends to extend the time to bring charges for pre-enactment conduct.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 1:20-cr-00830-pae document 178 filed 03/27/24 page 16 of 26
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document argues that the PROTECT Act's amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 applies to the defendant's conduct, even though it occurred before the amendment was enacted, because the statutory text clearly intends to extend the time to bring charges for pre-enactment conduct.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 1:20-cr-00830-pae document 178 filed 03/27/24 page 16 of 26
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.