Skip to content
Case File
d-8658Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing or legal brief: Case 2:17-cr-00354-JAK Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 10 of 20

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: case 2:17-cr-00354-jak document 1859 filed 03/22/21 page 10 of 20
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The document analyzes the District's Jury Plan and its territorial division, referencing United States v. Gottfried and United States v. Bahna. It discusses the rationale behind dividing jury pools territorially and the implications for fair cross-section challenges. The Second Circuit's decision in Bahna is highlighted as framing the inquiry into whether a jury venire drawn from a properly designated division satisfies fair cross-section requirements.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: case 2:17-cr-00354-jak document 1859 filed 03/22/21 page 10 of 20
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: Case 2:17-cr-00365-JMA Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 11 of 20

The court rejects Schulte's contention that the relevant community for his fair cross-section challenge is the Manhattan counties or the entire District, instead concluding that the White Plains counties are the relevant community. The court also finds that the government's decision to seek the indictment from White Plains was proper. The ruling is based on the precedent set in United States v. Bahna.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Summary Order: 104-1

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.

4p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 109-1

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.

26p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Index of Trial Documents: 11-cr-00383

This document is an index of trial documents from a criminal case (United States v. David Parse, et al.). It lists various documents, including trial transcripts, letters, emails, and exhibits. The documents are related to the trial proceedings, jury charge discussions, and evidence presented.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 1109-11

Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes. The District Court imposed concurrent prison terms of 60, 120, and 240 months. The appeal is before the United States Court of Appeals.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Notice of Case Manager Change: 111

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issues a notice stating that the case manager for the case United States v. Maxwell (Docket #22-1426cr) has been changed. Inquiries should be directed to a provided phone number. The case originated in the SDNY court under Judge Nathan.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.