court filing or legal memorandum: DOJ-OGR-00001000
Summary
The document lists multiple court cases in the S.D.N.Y. where pre-trial bail applications were denied, despite defendants having underlying health conditions that could put them at higher risk for COVID-19. Judges consistently ruled against releasing defendants pre-trial, even when health conditions were cited. The compilation suggests a judicial trend during the pandemic.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (9)
Related Documents (6)
court filing or legal memorandum: 1220
The document lists various court cases in the Southern District of New York where defendants with underlying health conditions, such as asthma, diabetes, and hypertension, were denied pre-trial bail despite the COVID-19 pandemic. The cases demonstrate a trend of courts denying bail applications even when defendants presented health risks. The document appears to be a compilation of cases used to support a legal argument.
court filing or legal memorandum: 1:17-cr-00330
The document analyzes the legal framework surrounding detention hearings under the Bail Reform Act, focusing on the presumption against releasing defendants charged with certain offenses involving minors and the conditions for rebutting this presumption and reopening a detention hearing.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 429
The defense attorney argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released from pretrial detention as she is not a flight risk, has been detained for an extended period, and faces challenging conditions that impede her ability to prepare for trial. The letter highlights new evidence that undermines the government's case and compares Maxwell's treatment unfavorably to other defendants like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby.
court filing or legal memorandum: Case:de201c7-003130eAuN:Do6umen#01002File#0123/28PagReof 18o# 36
The document argues that purported waivers of extradition are unenforceable and effectively meaningless, citing numerous court cases that have recognized this principle. It counters the defense's argument that some courts have required defendants to execute such waivers as a condition of release. The document concludes that defendants who sign such waivers and then flee will likely contest their validity and/or voluntariness.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell [EFTA00008716]
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell June 29, 2020 Grand Jury Presentation GM_GLSDNY_00000103 GM_GJ_SDNY_00000104 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York GM_GLSDNY_000001 05 358 El Brillo Wa , Palm Beach, Florida GM_GUON,O00O01. 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico GM_GLSDNY_00000107 GM_GLSDNY_0...
court filing: 00631302
The document argues against the defendant's temporary release, citing cases where release was denied due to the trial not being imminent. It also notes that the detention center (MDC) has been responsive to defense counsel's concerns, providing access to the defendant.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.