court filing: DOJ-OGR-00001196
Summary
The document argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's bail package is substantial and includes significant financial security, making her wealth a reason to set strict bail conditions rather than deny bail. It counters the government's claims that Maxwell is adept at hiding and thus a flight risk, and disputes the government's assertions about her spouse's financial situation and moral suasion.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 20-cr-60830-AJNT Document 1032
The document argues that Ms. Maxwell's wealth is not a reason to deny bail, but rather a reason to set strict conditions that would result in significant financial consequences if she were to flee. It also disputes the government's assertion that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk due to her alleged expertise at hiding.
court filing: DOJ-OGR-00001134
The document argues that the discovery provided by the government lacks evidence supporting the charges against Ms. Maxwell, including emails, texts, and police reports, and instead contains exculpatory police reports. The few relevant documents do not significantly support the government's case. The filing appears to be part of the defense's strategy to challenge the indictment.
court filing or affidavit: DOJ-OGR-00020036
The document reports on Ghislaine Maxwell's net worth and financial transactions from 2015-2020, including the sale of a New York City property and the transfer of her assets into a trust controlled by her spouse. It also details her marriage and joint tax filings with her spouse. The report concludes that there has been no significant alienation of assets outside of her or her spouse's control.
court filing or affidavit: DOJ-OGR-00020048
The document presents expert testimony from Mr. Perry and Mr. Julié on extradition law, concluding that Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition to the US is likely and permissible under UK and French law. Mr. Perry's report assesses the UK extradition process, while Mr. Julié's report reviews the French extradition process. Both experts' opinions contradict certain representations made by the government at an initial hearing.
court filing: DOJ-OGR-00020052
The document argues that the discovery provided by the prosecution lacks evidence supporting the charges against Ms. Maxwell, with no contemporaneous records or police reports implicating her in the alleged crimes. The few relevant documents do not support the government's case. The discovery contains exculpatory police reports instead.
court filing: DOJ-OGR-00020053
The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell was built after Jeffrey Epstein's death, citing the timing of subpoenas for Maxwell's financial information. It highlights the lack of corroborating evidence and suggests this strengthens Maxwell's desire to clear her name in court, weighing in favor of granting bail.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.