Court Filing - Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories: DOJ-OGR-00015197
Summary
The plaintiff answers interrogatories regarding her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, stating she was introduced to him in 2002 and provided massages until 2003. She details the transportation to his home and the compensation she received, including money, gifts, and other items. The document is subject to a protective order for certain paragraphs.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories: DOJ-OGR-00015198
The plaintiff responds to an interrogatory regarding individuals who allegedly committed lewd or lascivious conduct against them since age 10, stating that there are 'None' other than their claims against Mr. Epstein. The response is part of a larger court filing subject to a protective order.
Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00015200
The Plaintiff files a notice with the court that they have furnished Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories to the attorney for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The document is certified by the Plaintiff's attorneys, Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill.
Court Filing: #281849/clw
The plaintiff in a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a notice with the court indicating that they had provided answers to interrogatories propounded by Epstein's legal team on January 16, 2009. The notice was filed by attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill on February 13, 2009. The document is subject to a protective order.
court filing: 28509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
court filing: 28589
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit, arguing that the additional depositions seek irrelevant and inadmissible evidence. Maxwell contends that the case is a simple defamation claim and that the plaintiff's attempts to introduce evidence about other alleged victims and Epstein's organization are extraneous and should not be allowed.
Court Filing: Case 1:20-cv-00803-RP Document 122-20 Filed 06/04/21 Page 63 of 8
Ms. Maxwell requests the court to order the Plaintiff to disclose information about alleged ongoing criminal investigations or stay the proceedings. The Plaintiff has represented that she is part of an ongoing investigation involving Ms. Maxwell, but Ms. Maxwell is unaware of any such investigation. The Defendant's counsel has attempted to verify the existence of the investigation with the Assistant United States Attorney.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.