Court Filing - Response to Interrogatories: DOJ-OGR-00015261
Summary
Jane Doe's response to interrogatories details her interactions with several individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, and others, alleging they facilitated Epstein's abuse or were present during abusive incidents. The response provides specific dates and descriptions of these interactions. The document is part of a court filing in a case against Epstein's estate.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
court filing or legal document: 20-20033-PAE
The document discusses Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement, which included a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment and immunity for certain co-conspirators. It also outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, including conspiracy and sex trafficking. The document provides insight into the legal proceedings against Epstein and Maxwell.
Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (2008)
The non-prosecution agreement negotiated by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta shielded Jeffrey Epstein and unnamed 'potential co-conspirators' from federal sex trafficking charges. Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges and served approximately 13 months with work release. The NPA was later ruled by Judge Kenneth Marra to have violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to notify victims. The agreement granted immunity to Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, and other unnamed associates.
Court Filing - Plaintiff's Response to Interrogatories: 1:20-cv-00484-JKG
This document is Plaintiff Jane Doe's response to the first set of interrogatories propounded by Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The response includes objections and answers based on currently available information, with a preliminary statement noting that the responses are not admissions and are subject to further investigation and discovery. The case is a civil lawsuit related to allegations against Jeffrey E. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
court filing: 28509
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
Court Filing: 532
The defense argues that Exhibit 52, a document the government seeks to admit as evidence, is unreliable and lacks proper authentication. They contend that the government's attempt to authenticate it through Ghislaine Maxwell's 2016 deposition testimony fails because the deposition exhibit shown to Maxwell (Deposition Exhibit 13) is not the same as Exhibit 52, and Maxwell disclaimed knowledge of its origin or authenticity.
Court Filing: 700
The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.