This document is a table of authorities listing various court cases cited in a legal filing, primari...
Summary
This document is a table of authorities listing various court cases cited in a legal filing, primarily from the United States District Courts and Courts of Appeals. The cases cited relate to different criminal matters and legal issues. The table is part of a larger court document, likely a brief or memorandum, filed in the case identified as 'Case 1:2015cr00388-AJN'.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a Verified Itemized Bill of Costs submitted by counsel in the case United States of ...
The document is a Verified Itemized Bill of Costs submitted by counsel in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, as per FRAP 39(c), requesting the Clerk to prepare an itemized statement of costs.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denyi...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denying Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The court also denied her motion for temporary pretrial release and noted concerns about her sleeping conditions while incarcerated, suggesting that such issues should be addressed to the district court.
Legal Analysis of Testimonial Privilege in Subpoenaed Document Production
The passage provides a doctrinal summary of Supreme Court cases (Fisher, Hubbell, Ponds) concerning the Fifth Amendment testimonial privilege. It contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, Distinguishes between 'foregone conclusion' and testimonial document production. Cites Fisher v. United States (1976) and United States v. Hubbell (2000) as precedents. Explains the burden on the gov
General Flynn Cites Fifth Amendment Privilege to Decline Congressional Document Production
The passage merely outlines legal arguments for Flynn's Fifth Amendment claim and references existing case law. It does not provide new factual leads, names, transactions, or evidence of misconduct, o Flynn argues that producing documents would be testimonial and thus protected. References to Watkins v. United States and United States v. Hubbell establish legal precedent. Mentions that the DOJ has
Former DOJ attorney argues against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, citing prior victim‑rights work
The passage provides a potential lead that a senior DOJ official with a background in child‑victim prosecution advocated against charging Epstein, suggesting internal influence on the case. It names a Author claims to have co‑authored the DOJ Federal Child Support Prosecution Handbook. Author participated in high‑profile child‑exploitation prosecutions (e.g., United States v. Dwight Y Author argue
Legal brief argues Fifth Amendment privilege blocks House subpoena for Flynn's meetings with Russian officials
The passage is a legal argument citing case law to oppose a congressional subpoena of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. It does not provide new factual leads, names of meetings, dates, o Cites United States v. Doe, Hubbell, Fisher, and other precedents to argue the subpoena is overly br Claims the subpoena would compel Flynn to create a new document listing meetings with Russian offi
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.