court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023028
Summary
The document details the FBI and USAO's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including the defense team's efforts to influence the outcome and Acosta's decision to offer a plea deal. It outlines the key events and interactions between the parties from May 2006 to July 2007. The document appears to be a factual account from an official report or court filing.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particularly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the sexual offender registration requirement. It reveals that the USAO was adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender, while Epstein's team attempted to negotiate this term. The document also sheds light on the reasoning behind the non-prosecution provision and its potential implications.
Summary or Timeline Document: DOJ-OGR-00023045
This document summarizes the USAO's roles and responsibilities during the Epstein investigation from 2006 to 2009 and lists key events, including the opening of the federal investigation, signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and Epstein's guilty plea and release.
court filing or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein: DOJ-OGR-00023029
The document details the negotiations between the USAO and Epstein's defense team, including the proposed terms of a plea agreement and the involvement of key individuals. The negotiations involved multiple meetings and exchanges, with the USAO ultimately proposing a deal that included a two-year term of incarceration. The parties continued to negotiate, with the term of imprisonment being reduced over time.
Court document or legal filing, likely part of a larger report or appendix: DOJ-OGR-00023030
The document outlines the negotiations and challenges related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), including disagreements over terms such as sexual offender registration and monetary damages for victims. It details the interactions between prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, including Lefkowitz, Sloman, and Starr. The NPA's signing and subsequent disputes are covered, along with the Department's review of the case.
court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023035
The document details the events surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2007-2008, including investigations, victim notifications, and the handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the communications between prosecutors, investigators, and defense attorneys, and the steps taken to prepare for potential prosecution.
Court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023037
The document appears to be a report or court filing analyzing the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on the notification of victims and the professional conduct of DOJ officials. It concludes that while some decisions did not violate clear standards, they demonstrated poor judgment. The report also criticizes the government's treatment of victims, stating that they were not treated forthrightly or with sensitivity.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.