Skip to content
Case File
d-9234Dept. of JusticeDeposition

court document or deposition transcript: DOJ-OGR-00023069

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00023069
Pages
1
Persons
5

Summary

The document discusses internal USAO emails and interviews regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, including disagreements about meeting with his defense counsel and prosecution strategy. USAO officials Lourie, Menchel, and Villafaña had differing opinions on whether to meet with Epstein's lawyers. The document provides insight into the USAO's decision-making process in the Epstein case.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00023069
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050

The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008, highlighting key events such as the drafting of a prosecution memorandum, meetings with Epstein's counsel, and the eventual signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline also reveals the involvement of various officials, including Acosta, Sloman, and Lourie. The events documented in the timeline ultimately led to Epstein's state-based plea deal and sentencing.

1p
Dept. of JusticeDepositionUnknown

Investigative report or deposition summary: DOJ-OGR-00023077

The document discusses the reasoning behind the decision-making process in the Jeffrey Epstein case, including the preference for a state-based resolution due to the novelty of trafficking prosecutions and concerns about federal judges' receptiveness to certain plea agreements. It highlights the complexities and uncertainties faced by prosecutors at the time.

1p
Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119

The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particularly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the sexual offender registration requirement. It reveals that the USAO was adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender, while Epstein's team attempted to negotiate this term. The document also sheds light on the reasoning behind the non-prosecution provision and its potential implications.

1p
Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023132

The document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea, including his attorneys' efforts to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Despite multiple communications, the plea was eventually scheduled for January 4, 2008.

1p
Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

Court Document or Investigative Report: DOJ-OGR-00023194

The document outlines a series of meetings between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, detailing the topics discussed and the participants involved. It highlights the key events and negotiations leading up to the signing of the NPA and subsequent state plea agreement. The document appears to be part of a larger investigative report or court filing.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing or Investigative Report: Case 22-1426, Document 77

The document discusses the DOJ's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, detailing the organizational structure of the DOJ and USAO, and the procedures followed in the Epstein case. It highlights the involvement of various individuals, including AUSAs and Epstein's lawyers, and their interactions during the investigation. The document appears to be part of a larger report or court filing related to the Epstein case.

7p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.