Alan Dershowitz letter
Summary
Naanhowitz - 'WmMmachuwtsogle. -- losethecarey - Detech'ife Palm Beach Police Department 4 7 325 5. County Road PalmBeach. FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detective Recarey: I am sending you this letter in response to the serious concemyou raised at our meeting regarding an alleged claim that one of our investigators had misrepresented himself as u'pulice offioerand mam had actually attempted to impersonate you. As I told you neither 1 nor my client would ever tolerate any su'elt wuduet on
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
12/11/2007 11:37 FAX
12/11/2007 11:37 FAX a 002/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP NO ma MI IN It% Kenneth W Sten I o CAN NOW Ootelty Hiccintakc wcwouniMilacOrn Ikcember I I. 2007 O051 530-6444 I lonomble R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Unice Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: As we discussed during our telephone conversations on both Friday and Monday (yesterday), we arc submitting two separate letters that address our broad areas of deep concern in this matter: First, the cluster of fundamental policy issues surrounding the use and implementation of 2255. a richly policy-laden but uncharted area of federttl law: and second. our profound concerns as to the background and conduct of the investigation. Consistent with our conversations, we submit these letters with the assurance and understanding that our doing so in no manner constitutes a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement or unwinds that Agreement. We arc grateful for your courtesy in agreeing to receive
Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617-939-6001 • Detective Palm Beach Police Department 345 S. County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detectives: I am sending you this letter in response to the serious concern you raised at our meeting regarding an alleged claim that one of our investigators had misrepresented himself as a police officer and in fact had actually attempted to impersonate you. As I told you neither I nor my client would ever tolerate any such conduct on the part of our investigators. With that in mind, I immediately began an inquiry of our staff, and believe that the contemporaneous notes taken by our investigator, while attempting to interview will provide the necessary explanation for your thoroughly justified consternation.. It will also, I believe, provide a more troublesome and telling illustration of her character. At our meeting, you may recall, .I -also advised you that our investigation had discovered at least o
Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie...
The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party. Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1. 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident alleg
'0450,V Q+ t-Pc4IA
'0450,V Q+ t-Pc4IA T ) --t el.! "'o'f j P l ' a .,1_4,a-IS 4Q/ Il l'21 EFTA00176111 12/11/2007 11:37 FAX la 002/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP WO. WM I I IMkIuI OM. MN Konnulh W. Slam to Coll WMOr ChrOdy. (213) 6111)-U4-10 leilautektrklond.com V lajtAOSIMILF: (30a.530-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein INair Alex: 777 South Finumon Sunni tun Attuuluu, et-tidying, 900'7 (213) 080-8400 www.lorNItuul.com December I I. 2007 HICSul Wu: (213) 600.8500 As we discussed during our telephone conversations un both Friday and Monday (yesterday). we arc submitting two separate letters that address our broad areas of deep concern in this matter: Finn, the cluster of limdamemal policy issues surrounding the use and implementation of 2255. n richly policy-luden but uncharted area of federal law: and second. our profound concerns as to th
Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition
Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition The passage references a claim that Alan Dershowitz disclosed a criminal extortion scheme involving unnamed clients during a deposition, and mentions related defamation lawsuits. While the details are vague and unverified, the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and a federal courtroom provides a concrete lead (date, location, parties) that could be pursued. The claim is moderately controversial and potentially sensitive, but it lacks clear novelty and specific financial details, limiting its score. Key insights: Dershowitz allegedly told lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell that "your clients were involved" in a criminal extortion plot.; The statement was made on October 15, 2015, during a deposition in Broward County, Florida.; Bradley and Cassell had sued Dershowitz for defamation, and Dershowitz had filed a countersuit.
Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit
Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or internal materials, it lacks concrete details about the content, dates, or parties beyond the litigants, limiting immediate investigative value. However, the mention of “control” and alleged refusal to produce metadata could merit follow‑up to determine what information is being withheld and whether it relates to broader controversies surrounding Dershowitz. Key insights: Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’.; The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment.; Discovery objections focus on timeframe limits, implying plaintiffs seek records spanning an undefined period.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.