Kelly, Dolphus Non Prosecution Agreement
The Parties to this agreement hereby stipulate that Dolphus Kelly shall be given immunity from prosecution regarding any and all statements made during the course of pretrial interviews and trial in Case Number 201300696 in Cochise County. The scheduled trial dates are March 31, 2015 to April 3, 2015. Vanessa Cartwright, Deputy County Attorney in Santa Cruz County, also hereby stipulates that in exchange for Dolphus Kelly?s participation in the investigation, pretrial and trial process in Case
Summary
The Parties to this agreement hereby stipulate that Dolphus Kelly shall be given immunity from prosecution regarding any and all statements made during the course of pretrial interviews and trial in Case Number 201300696 in Cochise County. The scheduled trial dates are March 31, 2015 to April 3, 2015. Vanessa Cartwright, Deputy County Attorney in Santa Cruz County, also hereby stipulates that in exchange for Dolphus Kelly?s participation in the investigation, pretrial and trial process in Case
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Jeffrey Epstein email detailing extensive 2010 fashion week and charity event schedule with high‑profile attendees
The email provides a concrete list of dozens of invitation‑only fashion shows, fundraisers, and gala events that Jeffrey Epstein was coordinating or attending in September 2010. It names numerous prom Epstein’s email lists over 200 invitation‑only fashion shows and fundraisers across New York during Notable names appear: Valerie Jarrett, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Bill O'Reilly, Stephen Burrows, and many
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile...
The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) an Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creati The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contac
*061000146*
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01292220
Jeffrey Epstein email sharing a calendar of fashion and charity events (Sept 2010)
Jeffrey Epstein email sharing a calendar of fashion and charity events (Sept 2010) The passage lists low‑level social events (fashion shows, fundraisers) and includes only a generic reference to the New York City Mayor’s Office. It provides no concrete financial transactions, dates of wrongdoing, or direct links to high‑ranking officials, making it a weak investigative lead. Key insights: Epstein circulated a list of fashion‑industry events and fundraisers in early September 2010.; One event (Couture Fashion Week) was tied to a Susan G. Komen fundraiser and honored Dara Richardson‑Heron.; Contact details for event organizers are included (emails, phone numbers).
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Ghislaine Maxwell Supreme Court petition
No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.