Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-20532764Court Unsealed

James Little Criminal Complaint

Date
March 29, 2021
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-20532764
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

$2 5HY &ULPLQDO&RPSODLQW 81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 IRUWKH BBBBBBBBBB'LVWULFWRIBBBBBBBBBB &DVH1R Defendant(s) &5,0,1$/&203/$,17 ,WKHFRPSODLQDQWLQWKLVFDVHVWDWHWKDWWKHIROORZLQJLVWUXHWRWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHI 2QRUDERXWWKHGDWH V RI LQWKHFRXQW\RI LQWKH 'LVWULFWRI WKHGHIHQGDQW V YLRODWHG Code Section Offense Description 7KLVFULPLQDOFRPSODLQWLVEDVHGRQWKHVHIDFWV u &RQWLQXHGRQWKHDWWDFKHGVKHHW Complainant’s signature Printed name and title $WWHVWHGWRE\WKHDSSOLFDQWLQDF

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
$2 5HY &ULPLQDO&RPSODLQW 81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 IRUWKH BBBBBBBBBB'LVWULFWRIBBBBBBBBBB &DVH1R Defendant(s) &5,0,1$/&203/$,17 ,WKHFRPSODLQDQWLQWKLVFDVHVWDWHWKDWWKHIROORZLQJLVWUXHWRWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHI 2QRUDERXWWKHGDWH V RI LQWKHFRXQW\RI LQWKH 'LVWULFWRI WKHGHIHQGDQW V YLRODWHG Code Section Offense Description 7KLVFULPLQDOFRPSODLQWLVEDVHGRQWKHVHIDFWV u &RQWLQXHGRQWKHDWWDFKHGVKHHW Complainant’s signature Printed name and title $WWHVWHGWRE\WKHDSSOLFDQWLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI)HG5&ULP3E\ 7HOHSKRQH VSHFLI\UHOLDEOHHOHFWURQLFPHDQV  'DWH &LW\DQGVWDWH Printed name and title 8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD Y District of Columbia -DPHV /LWWOH '2% ;;;;;; -DQXDU\   &ROXPELD  86& †  D   86& †  D   86& †  H  '  86& †  H  * .QRZLQJO\ (QWHULQJ RU 5HPDLQLQJ LQ DQ\ 5HVWULFWHG %XLOGLQJ RU *URXQGV :LWKRXW /DZIXO $XWKRULW\  'LVRUGHUO\ &RQGXFW LQ 5HVWULFWHG %XLOGLQJ RU *URXQGV  'LVRUGHUO\ &RQGXFW RQ &DSLWRO *URXQGV  3DUDGLQJ RU 'HPRQVWUDWLQJ LQ &DSLWRO %XLOGLQJ 6HH DWWDFKHG VWDWHPHQW RI IDFWV 6SHFLDO $JHQW  :DVKLQJWRQ '& Judge’s signature 5RELQ00HULZHDWKHU 86 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS Your affiant, is an FBI Special Agent assigned to the Charlotte Division. In my duties as a Special Agent, I am assigned to investigate federal criminal violations of law. Currently, I am tasked with investigating criminal activity in and around the Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021. As an FBI Special Agent, I am authorized by law to engage in the prevention and investigation of violations of Federal criminal laws. The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification were allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also closed to members of the public. On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3, 2020. The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Shortly thereafter, by approximately 1:30 p.m., the House and Senate adjourned to separate chambers to resolve a particular objection. Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding, first in the joint session, and then in the Senate chamber. As the proceedings continued in both the House and the Senate, and with Vice President Mike Pence present and presiding over the Senate, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. As noted above, temporary and permanent barricades were in place around the exterior of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside. At such time, the certification proceedings were still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured. Members of the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however, shortly around 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by breaking windows and by assaulting members of the U.S. Capitol Police, as others in the crowd encouraged and assisted those acts. Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m. members of the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Mike Pence, were instructed to—and did—evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the sessions resumed. During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage, which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene, depicted evidence of Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 5 2 violations of local and federal law, including scores of individuals inside the U.S. Capitol building without authority to be there. A person identified herein as “Complainant One” is a resident of North Carolina. Complainant One called the FBI tip line after the events of January 6th to provide information to the FBI. The FBI followed up and interviewed Complainant One. Complainant One said that Complainant One is related to an individual named James “Les” Little (“LITTLE”), who lives in Claremont, NC. On January 6, 2021, LITTLE was texting with Complainant One about something unrelated. Complainant One knows LITTLE to use a cell phone with phone number ***-***- 7076. At 3:20 p.m., LITTLE texted Complainant One “We just took over the Capital.” At 3:36 p.m., LITTLE texted Complainant One “We are stopping treason! Stealing elections is treason! We’re not going to take it anymore!” Complainant One provided screenshots of the above text messages to the FBI. A screenshot is included below. Also on January 6, 2021, Complainant One saw a post about LITTLE on Facebook. A different relative of LITTLE’s posted a message asking for prayer for LITTLE, who they said was traveling back from Washington, DC. Complainant One provided the FBI with a screenshot of this Facebook post. Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 2 of 5 3 On January 13, 2021, the FBI interviewed LITTLE at his residence in Claremont, NC. LITTLE told the FBI that he lived at that residence with his elderly mother. LITTLE voluntarily provided the following information: LITTLE went to Washington, DC the day before the planned protest on January 5, 2021. On January 6th, LITTLE went to the protest. Little stated that at some point, the police began using tear gas at the protest. LITTLE said that some people went into the Capitol, and he got caught up in the moment and went into the Capitol as well. LITTLE said that he had no intention of entering the Capitol when he went to the protest, but that he got caught up in the moment. LITTLE said he walked around the Capitol, smiling and fist bumping other people who were also inside the Capitol. LITTLE walked around the Senate Chamber and took photographs of himself there. LITTLE stated that he sent these photographs to people that he trusted. LITTLE said that he must have gotten caught up in the moment when he sent a text about taking over the Capitol. LITTLE left the Washington, D.C. area and returned to North Carolina that evening. LITTLE chose not to answer follow-up questions from the FBI Agents. LITTLE also declined to turn over the photographs that he took with his telephone of himself and others inside the Capitol. On January 19, 2021, the Affiant queried a paid database that the FBI has access to for the registered owner of phone number ***-***-7076. The database reported that the phone number is assigned to James Little and serviced by AT&T. The FBI obtained an image of LITTLE from the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicle (“DMV”) files. The FBI used this DMV image to search an FBI database of photos and videos of individuals near, and inside of, the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. This search of the database returned four possible photos of LITTLE: two of the photos depicted one person and the other two photos depicted a second person The Affiant interviewed Complainant One again and showed Complainant One the potential images of LITTLE. Complainant One positively identified the images below as being of LITTLE. Complainant One excluded two additional images, of another individual, and said that they were not LITTLE. Complainant One based their identification of LITTLE on having known LITTLE most of LITTLE’s life and having spent significant amounts of time with LITTLE. Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 3 of 5 4 The FBI continued to search photos and videos from inside and around the Capitol Building that were collected as part of the investigation. The FBI identified an additional photograph of LITTLE inside of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. That image is below. (The Affiant has added an arrow pointing to LITTLE). According to records obtained through a search warrant which was served on AT&T on January 6, 2021, in and around the time of the incident, the cellphone associated with ***-***- 7076 was identified as having utilized a cell site consistent with providing service to a geographic area that includes the interior of the United States Capitol building. Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 4 of 5 5 Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe that JAMES LITTLE violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 1752(a)(1) and (2), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do; and (2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions. For purposes of Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance. Finally, your affiant submits there is also probable cause to believe that JAMES LITTLE violated 40 U.S.C. §§ 5104(e)(2)(D) and (G), which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings. FBI SPECIAL AGENT Attested to by the applicant in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4.1 by telephone, this 15th , day of March 2021. ___________________________________ 52%,100(5,:($7+(5 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 5 of 5 $2 5HY $UUHVW:DUUDQW 81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 IRUWKH BBBBBBBBBB'LVWULFWRIBBBBBBBBBB 8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD Y &DVH1R Defendant $55(67:$55$17 7R $Q\DXWKRUL]HGODZHQIRUFHPHQWRIILFHU <28$5(&200$1'('WRDUUHVWDQGEULQJEHIRUHD8QLWHG6WDWHVPDJLVWUDWHMXGJHZLWKRXWXQQHFHVVDU\GHOD\ (name of person to be arrested)  ZKRLVDFFXVHGRIDQRIIHQVHRUYLRODWLRQEDVHGRQWKHIROORZLQJGRFXPHQWILOHGZLWKWKHFRXUW u ,QGLFWPHQW u 6XSHUVHGLQJ,QGLFWPHQW u ,QIRUPDWLRQ u 6XSHUVHGLQJ,QIRUPDWLRQ u &RPSODLQW u 3UREDWLRQ9LRODWLRQ3HWLWLRQ u 6XSHUYLVHG5HOHDVH9LRODWLRQ3HWLWLRQ u9LRODWLRQ1RWLFH u 2UGHURIWKH&RXUW 7KLVRIIHQVHLVEULHIO\GHVFULEHGDVIROORZV 'DWH &LW\DQGVWDWH Printed name and title 5HWXUQ 7KLVZDUUDQWZDVUHFHLYHGRQ(date) DQGWKHSHUVRQZDVDUUHVWHGRQ (date) DW (city and state)  'DWH Arresting officer’s signature Printed name and title District of Columbia -$0(6 /,77/( -$0(6 /,77/(  86& †  D   .QRZLQJO\ (QWHULQJ RU 5HPDLQLQJ LQ DQ\ 5HVWULFWHG %XLOGLQJ RU *URXQGV :LWKRXW /DZIXO $XWKRULW\  86& †  D   'LVRUGHUO\ FRQGXFW LQ UHVWULFWHG EXLOGLQJ RU JURXQGV  86& †  H  '  'LVRUGHUO\ &RQGXFW RQ &DSLWRO *URXQGV  86& †  H  *  SDUDGLQJ RU GHPRQVWUDWLQJ LQ &DSLWRO EXLOGLQJ  :DVKLQJWRQ '& Issuing officer’s signature 5RELQ00HULZHDWKHU 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH Case 3:21-mj-00076-DSC Document 1-2 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 1

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' yt To: ' .111r)a.r>alSANYS)" )" Cc: ' (CRM)" czi Subject: RE: SDNY case Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:46:21 +0000 Dea I heard you defeated the bail proposal. Congrats! My meeting with the Paris Prosecutor's Office was pushed by a day, and is now set for January 7th. Can we pick a time for a call between now and then? Would Tuesday the 5th in the am (NY time) work for everyone? In the meantime, I am referring the French MLAT request to your IC ). I don't know if you have any privilege issues in your case...and I don't see anything in the request that would revealed any privileged info. But I wanted to mention, in case anyone needs to screen it before it comes to you. If not, I can send it to you directly as well. DOJ Attache/Magistrat de liaison anthicain U.S. Embassy, Paris From: Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 6:03 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (CRM) < Subject: RE: SDNY case Hi all, (CRM) Maxwell's attorneys filed the attached supplemental report from their French

12p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "

From: " :1" To:' Subject: accessory Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000 Embedded: possible_guidelines_calculation.msg Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements: First, that the crime of [specify crime' alleged in the Indictment was committed by 'specify offenderl; Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender's' participation in it: Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted 'the offender' with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender's' apprehension, trial or punishment. The punishment is: an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment [. . .]; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. One-half the maximum term of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking being, of course, a cap of 2.5 years.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department ofJustiee United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Bullefing One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 August 19, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: As the Court is aware, on the morning of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. On August 16, 2019, and after conducting an autopsy, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York issued a statement identifying the cause of death as hanging, and the manner of death as suicide. In light of the death of the defendant prior to a conviction becoming final, the Government must request the Court approve the attached proposed or

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regardin...

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, arguing that the defendant's request for early disclosure is not justified and that the court's current plan for juror name disclosure is sufficient. The government contends that the defendant is seeking extra time to conduct research on prospective jurors without a valid reason. The government's response cites relevant case law and the court's previous orders to support its position.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.