Copy of ODR Reports thru 2021_IPRA
Summary
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Reports Initial Go-Live June 3, 2019: 6 th and 9th District June 10, 2019: 2nd District June 17, 2019: Metro ODR 2.0 Go-Live - December 14, 2020 Last day prior to ‘Pause’ - June 30, 2021 Judicial Information Division/Odyssey Business Support Margarita G. Terrell and Diana Bennett 10/26/2021 Table of Contents ODR Summary by Month - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 Agreement by Type (Negotiated / Mediated) - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 Agreements Reached by Court - 2019 - 2020 - 2021
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Court Order or Protective Order related to Discovery: Case: 20-60033 Document: 00610033026 Page: 11 Filed: 11/06/12
This document is a court order governing the handling of Discovery materials in a case, including the protection of Confidential Information and the procedures for returning or destroying such materials after the case concludes. It outlines the responsibilities of Defense Counsel and the Government regarding these materials. The order remains in effect until modified or until certain conditions are met.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS, PLAINTIFF, V. ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, THE 1953 TRUST, PLAN D, LLC; GREAT ST. JIM, LLC; NAUTILUS, INC.; HYPERION AIR, LLC; POPLAR, INC., JOHN AND JANE DOES DEFENDANTS, Case No.: ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT COMES NOW, the Government of the United States Virgin Islands ("Government") and files this Complaint against the above-named Defendants and in support thereof, would show unto the Court as follows: JURISDICTION AND PARTIES I. The Attorney General of the United States Virgin Islands (herein after "Virgin Islands") brings this action on behalf of the Plaintiff, Government of the Virgin Islands, pursuant to 3 V.I.C. § 114 and her statutory authority to enforce the laws of the Virgin Islands, and advocate for the public interest, safety, health and well-being of persons in the Virgin Islands. 2. This Court h
Court Filing: 20cr833 (D.N.J. filed 11/18/20)
This court filing outlines the procedures for the defendant and defense counsel to access and handle discovery materials marked as 'highly confidential' by the government. It restricts the dissemination and copying of such materials and requires designated persons and potential defense witnesses to sign an order acknowledging the confidentiality obligations. The order aims to balance the defendant's right to prepare for trial with the need to protect sensitive information.
EFTA Document EFTA01405372
NAME SEARCHED: 3. Epstein & Co PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC
09/18/2007 02:53
09/18/2007 02:53 PM To 'Jay Lefkowite < cc bec Subject Factual proffer Hi Jay — I didn't want us to get sidetracked during the conference call. I want to make sure that we have a factual basis for "harassment" Forcibly flying omewhere else is a different 1512 offense with a 10 year cap. 1 is is the factual proffer that I drafted up earlier this afternoon, to give you an idea of what it would look like. When I include a factual proffer in a plea agreement, I usually use prefatory language like: The parties agree that, had this case proceeded to trial, the United States would have proven the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the following facts are true and correct and are sufficient to support a plea of guilty . <Cpstein Plea Proffer.doc>> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax «< Attachment 'Epstein Plea Proffer.doc' has been archived by user 'CommonStorellT/Klrkland•Ellls' on '11/26/2007
FBI military commissions investigation
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHALID SHAIKH MOHAMMAD; WALID MUHAMMAD SALIH MUBARAK BIN 'ATT ASH; RAMZI BIN AL SHIBH; ALI ABDUL AZIZ ALI; MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL HAWSAWI AE 292R (GOV) Government Submission by Special Review Team In Response To Emergency Joint Defense Motion 21 May 2014 I. Timeliness This submission is timely in light of the Sp~cial Review Team's request in submission I AE 2921 (GOV) fo
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.