Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-23125507Court Unsealed

Village of Clinton FOIA

Village of Clinton 119 E. Michigan Avenue Clinton, Michigan 49236 Phone: (517 456-7494 FOIA Request for Public Records Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL 15.231, et seq. Request No.: __________ Date Received: ___________ Check if received via: ¨ Email ¨ Fax ¨ Other Electronic Method Date delivered to junk/spam folder: _______________ (Please Print or Type) Date discovered in junk/spam folder: _______________ Request for: ¨ Copy ¨ Certified copy ¨ Record inspecti

Date
October 6, 2022
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-23125507
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Village of Clinton 119 E. Michigan Avenue Clinton, Michigan 49236 Phone: (517 456-7494 FOIA Request for Public Records Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL 15.231, et seq. Request No.: __________ Date Received: ___________ Check if received via: ¨ Email ¨ Fax ¨ Other Electronic Method Date delivered to junk/spam folder: _______________ (Please Print or Type) Date discovered in junk/spam folder: _______________ Request for: ¨ Copy ¨ Certified copy ¨ Record inspecti

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Village of Clinton 119 E. Michigan Avenue Clinton, Michigan 49236 Phone: (517 456-7494 FOIA Request for Public Records Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL 15.231, et seq. Request No.: __________ Date Received: ___________ Check if received via: ¨ Email ¨ Fax ¨ Other Electronic Method Date delivered to junk/spam folder: _______________ (Please Print or Type) Date discovered in junk/spam folder: _______________ Request for: ¨ Copy ¨ Certified copy ¨ Record inspection ¨ Subscription to record issued on regular basis Delivery Method: ¨ Will pick up ¨ Will make own copies onsite ¨ Mail to address above ¨ Email to address above ¨ Deliver on digital media provided by the Village: ________________________________________________________________ Note: The Village is not required to provide records in a digital format or on digital media if the Village does not already have the technological capability to do so. Describe the public record(s) as specifically as possible. You may use this form or attach additional sheets: Consent to Non-Statutory Extension of Village’s Response Time I have requested a copy of records or a subscription to records or the opportunity to inspect records, pursuant to the Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL 15.231, et seq. I understand that the Village must respond to this request within five (5) business days after receiving it, and that response may include taking a 10-business day extension. However, I hereby agree and stipulate to extend the Village’s response time for this request until: ________________ (month, day, year). Requestor’s Signature Date Name Phone Firm/Organization Fax Street Email City State Zip (Complete both sides) Village: Keep original and provide copy of both sides, along with Public Summary, to requestor at no charge. Request Form Note: Requestors are not required to use this form. The Village may complete one for recordkeeping if not used. Records Located on Website If the Village directly or indirectly administers or maintains an official internet presence, any public records available to the general public on that internet site at the time the request is made are exempt from any labor charges to redact (separate exempt information from non-exempt information). If the FOIA coordinator knows or has reason to know that all or a portion of the requested information is available on its website, the Village must notify the requestor in its written response that all or a portion of the requested information is available on its website. The written response, to the degree practicable in the specific instance, must include a specific webpage address where the requested information is available. On the detailed cost itemization form, the Village must separate the requested public records that are available on its website from those that are not available on the website and must inform the requestor of the additional charge to receive copies of the public records that are available on its website. If the Village has included the website address for a record in its written response to the requestor and the requestor thereafter stipulates that the public record be provided to him or her in a paper format or other form, including digital media, the Village must provide the public records in the specified format (if the Village has the technological capability) but may use a fringe benefit multiplier greater than the 50%, not to exceed the actual costs of providing the information in the specified format. Request for Copies/Duplication of Records on Village Website I hereby stipulate that, even if some or all of the records are located on a Village website, I am requesting that the Village make copies of those records on the website and deliver them to me in the format I have requested above. I understand that some FOIA fees may apply. Requestor’s Signature Date Overtime Labor Costs Overtime wages shall not be included in the calculation of labor costs unless overtime is specifically stipulated by the requestor and clearly noted on the detailed cost itemization form. Consent to Overtime Labor Costs I hereby agree and stipulate to the Village using overtime wages in calculating the following labor costs as itemized in the following categories: 1. ¨ Labor to copy/duplicate 2. ¨ Labor to locate 3a. ¨ Labor to redact 3b. ¨ Contract labor to redact 6b. ¨ Labor to copy/duplicate records already on Village’s website Requestor’s Signature Date Request for Discount: Indigence A public record search must be made and a copy of a public record must be furnished without charge for the first $20.00 of the fee for each request by an individual who is entitled to information under this act and who: 1) Submits an affidavit stating that the individual is indigent and receiving specific public assistance, OR 2) If not receiving public assistance, stating facts showing inability to pay the cost because of indigence. If a requestor is ineligible for the discount, the public body shall inform the requestor specifically of the reason for ineligibility in the public body's written response. An individual is ineligible for this fee reduction if ANY of the following apply: (i) The individual has previously received discounted copies of public records from the same public body twice during that calendar year, (ii) The individual requests the information in conjunction with outside parties who are offering or providing payment or other remuneration to the individual to make the request. A public body may require a statement by the requestor in the affidavit that the request is not being made in conjunction with outside parties in exchange for payment or other remuneration. Office Use: ¨ Affidavit Received ¨ Eligible for Discount ¨ Ineligible for Discount I am submitting an affidavit and requesting that I receive the discount for indigence for this FOIA request: Requestor’s Signature: Date: Request for Discount: Nonprofit Organization A public record search must be made and a copy of a public record must be furnished without charge for the first $20.00 of the fee for each request by a nonprofit organization formally designated by the state to carry out activities under subtitle C of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 and the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act, if the request meets ALL of the following requirements: (i) Is made directly on behalf of the organization or its clients. (ii) Is made for a reason wholly consistent with the mission and provisions of those laws under section 931 of the Mental Health Code, 1974 PA 258, MCL 330.1931. (iii) Is accompanied by documentation of its designation by the state, if requested by the City. Office Use: ¨ Documentation of State Designation Received ¨ Eligible for Discount ¨ Ineligible for Discount I stipulate that I am a designated agent for the nonprofit organization making this FOIA request and that this request is made directly on behalf of the organization or its clients and is made for a reason wholly consistent with the mission and provisions of those laws under section 931 of the Mental Health Code, 1974 PA 258, MCL 330.1931: Requestor’s Signature: Date:

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(517 456-7494
Phone330.1931

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01385042

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02680554

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain referencing alleged Jeffrey Epstein encounter and a purported Clinton dinner

The passage contains vague, unverified claims linking Jeffrey Epstein to a dinner with former President Bill Clinton, but provides no concrete dates, transaction details, or verifiable evidence. It su Alleged dinner with President Clinton on a Caribbean island, allegedly arriving by black helicopter. Claims the writer met Jeffrey Epstein as an adult and denies being his "sex slave". Reference to m

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities

The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste

1p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.