Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-24165916Court Unsealed

Victim impact statement

Date
November 14, 2023
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-24165916
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Vermont Superior Court Bennington Unit Fi'e“: 11/7/2023 124-1-19 Bncr Good Morning stand here Bewildered and Perplexed. have been living this nightmare which Mr. Fink caused, for over years now, of which were acknowledged by the state of Vermont. Why did this take so long, one can only guess. From our lst meeting, Mr. Fink systematically eliminated my ability to represent my son and my granddaughter. Under the guise of our Savior, he made sure every door was closed to us until the only one left

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Vermont Superior Court Bennington Unit Fi'e“: 11/7/2023 124-1-19 Bncr Good Morning stand here Bewildered and Perplexed. have been living this nightmare which Mr. Fink caused, for over years now, of which were acknowledged by the state of Vermont. Why did this take so long, one can only guess. From our lst meeting, Mr. Fink systematically eliminated my ability to represent my son and my granddaughter. Under the guise of our Savior, he made sure every door was closed to us until the only one left open was the one that forced me to have Sex with him against my will to save my family. Interesting, he recused himself from representing my son. On June 6, 2017, his motion was heard in Superior Court before my son's Child Support Hearing. After his motion, Mr. Fink did not leave the court. He stayed until the end watching my son represent himself. As we were leaving, Mr. Fink asked John and Ito step into the courts back room. He turned to me and said ”look can’t represent John. John should be able to successfully represent himself with out the need of another attorney. And he would guide us through the court system to save us money and to help us succeed in court Does this sound right to anyone here in this court. Following his instructions, everything he had us do ended in failure. According to the court, we did not file this or that right, which ended in motion denied, denied, denied. All this led to the meeting of July 17, 2017. Originally our meeting was supposed to be at Mr. Fink's office. He called me and said let me make it easy for you, you don't have to drive to my office, I can meet you at your home. He asked for my address and we would have our meeting there. I had 8 files from Mr. Fink on my table at home all to be addressed by him for court, in order to help my son get custody of his daughter. Suddenly out of nowhere I found Mr. Fink standing in my house unannounced. Told me the door was open, which it was not. Who walks through an unlocked door into a person’s home, without knocking, using a doorbell or speaking out, what was he really up to. I immediately walked over to the files and started taking notes on what he told me to do. After going through the last of the 8 files, this Narcistic predator grabbed me put me in a head lock, forced his tongue down my throat and proceeded to assault me from behind with his other hand. As I stood there horrified, I thought am I going to be forced to do this, is this the only way I could get my son's daughter back ?. Am I going to have to satisfy his self-centered needs to save my family? Suddenly a wave, I am not going to let him abuse me this way or anyone else. hit me. I finally got free of his strangle hold. While still holding tightly to my hands, he made every effort to threaten me into believing that if I did not succumb to what he wanted, I would pay for it one way or another. Surprise, Surprise from that moment on he made our lives miserable. Another attempt from Mr. Fink was an email he sent to me one month after I declined him “pleasuring me sexually for 5 hours. He sent me a confidential Court custody case that involved an event the same as mine. Mr. Fink represented the defendant. It showed that his client won. To entice me that I could win for my son and granddaughter. As I look back on this, I did not see any of this coming. I always thought there was a trust between a lawyer and who he was helping. That was my 1st mistake. My Second was believing that what happened to me was a 1st for Mr. Fink. He was too calculated, too controlling, too aggressive, very narcistic, he was way too comfortable with his approach, as if he had done it before. I can only wonder and hope, Thinking because we are here today, that this will never happen again. I would like to shine the light on the potential for repeat behavior of Mr. Fink. What is the court’s plan? Is trial your answer. If he is found guilty of a offence will he be linked to Diversion?I believe diversion is the right answer. I don't want to drag my family through the trial after the traumatic life they have lived the last 6 years. I am the victim and I should have a say in this. I was the one who was assaulted. Diversion is addressing his wrong doing and I will be there to address him, the impact to my family and for the well being of future victims, prevent this from happening again. As I stand before this court and scoff at his lawyer's contrived apology, I ask you Where is the Justice? Where is the justice for Mr. Fink’s wife, who on the day of the assualt I tried to escape his hold on me, I asked, are you married, he said yes, but that does not matter. Where is the Justice for my Son, my Granddaughter and for ME? For my Son, To see what he was going through to try and stay In his daughters life, broke my heart for him to be separated from his daughter and now it has been catastrophic for my family all because of Mr, Fink. My Granddaughter who lost touch with her dad. Who had no understanding why. Justice For Me. To live with outrage over the theft of my ability to protect my family. It was stolen from me by Mr. Fink. I will ask you again. Where is the Justice for my Son, my Granddaughter and for ME! Why should my family be exposed to trial trauma. We deserve closure TODAY. There has been no accountability until today. Year after year I was reminded about this case because it was pending - it was torture for so long. Our lives were affected by this, his life was not affected - he was still practicing law and we lost everything. I want this public accountability piece to give closure to myself so I can move forward and so that the public knows what he did. I do not want to go through the trial process. I agree with the diversion resolution. If he is not sincere in his remorse and if he does not successfully complete diversion, I will be ready to come back here for a trial on a felony. Thank you, YOUR HONOR

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

S.J. QUINNEY

tli S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW , THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH The Honorable Pam Bondi Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530 Via email: PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law S.J. Quinney College of Law University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 841 12 (institutional address for identification purposes only and not to imply institutional endorsement) February 28, 2025 Re: URGENT - Preventing the Release of the Names and Identifying Information of Jeffrey Epstein's Sexual Assault Victims Dear Attorney General Bondi: We write on behalf of our clients, multiple sexual assault victims of notorious sex abuser and trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. We have seen media reports indicating that the Justice Department has (quite properly in our view) released to the public various Epstein files—including media reports showing release of "The Epstein Files: Phase 1." We write to raise wi

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Subject: - u is airs ews ne Ing e nes ay, u y 29, 2020 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:25:50 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 1B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Barr Spars With Democrats At Contentious House Hearing. • Barr Says Democrats Have Tried To "Discredit" Him. • Barr Says Bash Investigating "High Number Of Unmaskings" During Obama Administration. PROTESTS • Memo Reveals Federal Agents Sought Role In Suppressing Protests Since Start. • New Mexico Governor Addresses Concerns About Federal Agents In Albuquerque. • Report: US, Oregon In Talks About Pulling Agents From Portland. • Portland Fines Federal Government For Unpermitted Fence Outside Courthouse. • US Park Police Head: Decision To Clear Protesters Not Linked To Trump "Photo Op." • Hundreds Of Cases Involving LAPD Off

47p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.