Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-24402697Court Unsealed

Epstein Drop Five

Date
February 3, 2024
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-24402697
Pages
223
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.m. 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Reported By: Deborah A. Harris, Court Reporter Notary Public, State of Florida Phone - 305.651.0706 Job No. JO277789 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 2 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 2 APPEARANCES: On behalf of the Plaintiffs: Jack Scarola, Esquire SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 686-6300 On behalf of the Deponent: Sigrid McCawley, Esquire BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 356-0011 On behalf of the Defendant: Mary Borja, Esquire WILEY REIN, LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 719-7000 On behalf of the Defendant: Richard Simpson, Esquire WILEY REIN, LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 719-7000 On behalf of the Defendant: Thomas E. Scott, Esquire COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 9150 South Dadeland Boulevard, 14th Floor Miami, Florida 33156 (305) 350-5300 On behalf of the Defendant: Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire SWEDER & ROSS, LLP 131 Oliver Street. Boston, Massachusetts 02110 (617) 646-4466 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 3 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 3 ALSO PRESENT Edward J. Pozzuoli, Special Master Robert Pacheco, Videographer Ryan Kick, Videographer Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell Alan M. Dershowitz Brittany N. Henderson, Esq. Meridith Schultz, Esquire --- INDEX WITNESS DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS Virginia Roberts Giuffre By Ms. Borja 5 By Mr. Scarola 201 By Ms. Borja 204 --- EXHIBITS DEFENDANT VR EXHIBITS FOR ID 1 - Notice. 6 2 - Disclosure list. 26 3 - Order. 59 4 - E-mail. 92 5 - Photo (Confidential) 100 6 - Article. 124 7 - Daily Mail. 155 8 - Daily Mail. 168 9 - Declaration. 170 10- FBI doc. 187 REPORTER'S NOTE: Exhibit 5 marked confidential, sealed, and retained by the Special Master. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 4 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 4 Deposition taken before Deborah A. Harris, Florida Professional Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause. --- THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. This is disk number one in the videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts in the matter of Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, Plaintiff versus Alan M. Dershowitz, Defendant. The deposition is being held at the Law Office of Boies, Schiller & Flexner located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301. Today's date is January 16th, 2016. The time is 9:07 a.m. My name is Robert Pacheco, I am the videographer. The court reporter is Deborah Harris, both from Esquire Deposition Solutions. Would counsel please introduce yourselves and your affiliation and the witness will be sworn in. MS. MCCAWLEY: My name is Sigrid McCawley. I'm with the Law Firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner. I'm here with my colleague, Meridith Schultz and we represent non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 5 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 5 MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola, counsel on behalf of Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell are also present. MS. HENDERSON: Brittany Henderson also on behalf of the Plaintiff. MS. BORJA: Mary Borja for Defendant, Alan Dershowitz. MR. SCOTT: Thomas Scott for the Defendant. MR. SIMPSON: Richard Simpson on behalf of Professor Dershowitz. MR. SWEDER: Ken Sweder of Sweder and Ross on behalf of Professor Dershowitz. SPECIAL MASTER: Ed Pozzuoli, Special Master. --- Thereupon, VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE, having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was examined and testified as follows: THE WITNESS: Yes, I do. DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. BORJA: Q. We have noticed this examination for you as Virginia Roberts. I understand you have a different married last name? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 6 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 6 A. Yes. Q. Could you pronounce that for me? A. Giuffre. Q. Giuffre. If I from time to time call you Ms. Roberts, would that be okay with you today? A. Absolutely. (Thereupon, Defendant's VR Exhibit No. 1, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. I'm going to hand you a document that's been marked as VR Exhibit Number 1, which is a notice of taking video duces tecum. Ms. Roberts, are you appearing here today pursuant to this notice of video deposition duces tecum? A. Yes. Q. And you've seen this document before today? A. No. Q. Did you bring any documents with you today pursuant to the duces tecum? A. No. Q. Were you asked to bring any documents with you today? A. No. Q. You understand that you're under oath today and that your testimony is being taken down by the court Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 7 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 7 reporter, correct? A. Yes. Q. And today's testimony is the same as if you were testifying before a judge and a jury. Do you understand that? A. Yes. Q. It's important that you allow me to finish my question and I'll allow you to finish your answer because the court reporter is very good, but she can only type one of us talking at a time. Is that okay? A. Yes. Q. It's also important that all of your answers be verbal since nodding your head or shaking your head if you mean yes or no, you should give it a verbal response. Is that agreeable? A. Yes. Q. What is your current home address? MS. MCCAWLEY: We're going to object on the record. You're welcome to notice anything to my law office for Virginia. She's had some safety issues with respect to her location so we're not going to be putting that on the record. MS. BORJA: That's fine. You're going to accept service for her for all purposes in this action? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 8 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 8 MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes. MS. BORJA: That's fine. Thank you. MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes. If you need to serve her with anything. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Roberts, are you taking medication that would effect in any way your ability to testify? A. No. Q. Were you involved in collecting documents for production in this case? A. I don't understand. Q. I'll get back to that in a little bit. Are you aware of the action that your attorneys, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, filed against the government? A. Yes. Q. If I call that the Federal action or the CVRA action, will you understand the action that I'm referring to? A. Yes. Q. And you sought to join that action, correct? A. Yes. Q. And you understand that you were Jane Doe #3 named in the motion for joinder, right? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 9 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 9 Q. I'm going to show you, I'm not going to mark it as an exhibit, a copy of Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 corrected motion pursuant to Rule 21 for joinder and action. Do you have that in front of you right now? A. Yes. Q. And this was entered as Document 280 in the docket for purposes of identification in our record here today. Did you review this document before it was filed? A. Not this specific document, no. Q. Were you aware that this joinder motion was being filed in the CVRA action? A. I knew there was an action for the CVRA for me to be joined, yes. Q. And you're aware, are you not, that there are allegations that you were sexually trafficked being made in that action, correct? A. I'm aware that there are allegations that I was trafficked. Q. If you turn to page 4 of this document the numbers are on the bottom of the page. In that first full paragraph in the third line down it says, Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions when she was a minor? MS. MCCAWLEY: Feel free to look at the entire page. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 10 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 10 MR. SCAROLA: It is a minor discrepancy, but I think you read it as when she was a minor and it's while she was a minor. BY MS. BORJA: Q. While she was a minor. Do you see where I'm reading starting in the third line? A. Yes. Q. Is that allegation true? A. Yes. Q. If you go to page 6 of the document, do you see the paragraph that's starts, Epstein also trafficked? A. Yes. Q. Is says Epstein also trafficked Jane Doe #3 for sexual purposes to many other powerful men including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister and other world leaders. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Is that allegation true? A. Yes. Q. The reference there to foreign presidents, do you see that? A. Yes. Q. You were sexually trafficked to foreign presidents? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 11 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 11 A. No. Q. So that's not true, you were not sexually trafficked to foreign presidents? A. I don't know what foreign president you're talking about. Q. Have you ever been sexually trafficked to any foreign president? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to allow you to ask that question, but with respect to specific identification of an individual we're not going to do that. At this point she has. MS. BORJA: Counsel, your objection has been made. No speaking objections, please. Let's move on. MS. MCCAWLEY: I can make my record, and my record is she's not going to be speaking with respect to individuals' names that are named in generalities in this document. SPECIAL MASTER: Objection overruled. You can answer. A. I understand well-known prime ministers and other world leaders; as far as foreign presidents, I'm not too sure, I don't know. Q. Have you ever met any foreign presidents? A. Foreign presidents as in overseas? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 12 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 12 Q. Sure, okay, overseas. A. No. Q. Have you ever met any foreign presidents from countries not overseas such as Canada or Mexico? A. No. Q. So you were not sexually trafficked to any foreign presidents; is that correct? A. As far as I know right now, yes. Q. It's correct that you were not sexually trafficked to them, right? A. You've asked me this three times and I'm telling you. Q. Okay. A well-known prime minister. Were you sexually trafficked to a well-known prime minister? A. Yes. Q. Who was that? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to this line of questioning. This has to do with safety concerns for her. MS. BORJA: Counsel, this is under seal. You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: No, she's not going to answer. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. MS. MCCAWLEY: Let me make my objection. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 13 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 13 SPECIAL MASTER: Make your objection. MS. MCCAWLEY: Regardless of it being under seal, we've seen that in this case the client that you represent has violated confidentiality orders regularly so we have no sense of security with a sense that this is a confidential record at this point. We are doing that under the Court's order. With respect to naming individuals who can harm a victim of sexual trafficking, she's a non-party in this action, not a plaintiff. She is not going to be revealing any names today of an individual who is going to harm her physically, period. If we have to go to Judge Lynch on that we will, I'm happy to do that, but she's not going to be naming individuals where there's a threat to her safety. SPECIAL MASTER: Response. MS. BORJA: It is under seal. I'm shocked that counsel would suggest that a prime minister is threatening the physical safety of this witness. There's no foundation for that. The suggestion that a foreign minister is going to physically harm has no evidence in this case, and it's being to be under seal. Let's get the evidence out while the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 14 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 14 witness is here. As you pointed out, she's a non-party. Let's make our record and move on. MS. MCCAWLEY: You may be shocked by that but -- SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. The reason why I'm here is so we don't have the back and forth. MS. MCCAWLEY: Sure. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to rule on the objection. Your objection at this point is overruled. You can answer. And I want to admonish everybody here that this is confidential and the protection of this witness is of paramount importance under the Confidentiality Order. So Ms. Roberts, you can answer the question that's been asked. MS. MCCAWLEY: At this point we're going to need to take a break because I'm not going to allow her to answer a question that's going to threaten her physical safety. So we can take a break on that. THE WITNESS: If I can just say, I personally know that this is not a good person to talk about and I'm not going to, point blank, I'm not going to say his name. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 15 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 15 SPECIAL MASTER: Okay. I can't twist her arm and force her so we'll deal with it. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Okay. Other world leaders, what other world leaders were you sexually trafficked to? MS. MCCAWLEY: We have the same objection. SPECIAL MASTER: And I would have the same ruling based upon the arguments. MS. MCCAWLEY: Let me just make my record. To the extent that there's a name of an individual that you can reveal that you do not feel would harm your physical safety, you're welcome to reveal them. Anybody else, you don't have to reveal at this time and we'll take that to Judge Lynch. A. Okay. Prince Andrew for one. Q. Other than Prince Andrew? A. There is another individual that I honestly do not know his name. Q. What country is he from? A. I'm not too sure, he spoke in a foreign -- he did speak foreign tongue, he spoke English as well, but I'm not too sure where he was from. Q. How do you know he is world leader? A. I was introduced to him as a prince. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 16 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 16 Q. Okay. Did he have security with him? A. I'm sure he did somewhere around, but not when I was with him. Q. Did you see security? A. No. Q. Did you -- where were you when you met him? A. On this occasion the South of France. Q. Are there witnesses to you being sexually trafficked to this prince? A. Yes. Q. Name them. A. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell. Q. Anyone else? A. There was a whole bunch of people in the room so of course. Q. Was this an orgy? A. No. Q. Who else was in the room? A. I can't name them all, there was a lot. Q. Name as many as you can name? A. I don't know their names. I can't name their names. Q. They were present during sexual activity? A. They were present before the sexual activity and then I went to have sexual activity with him Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 17 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 17 alone. Q. So he's the only witness to your sexual activity, the prince? A. On the instruction of Epstein and Ghislaine, yes. Q. Where in the South of France were you? A. I don't know. Q. Were you on a boat, were you in a house? A. We were at a like a cabana, not cabana, like a resort, but it was a big party. Q. Who was throwing the party? A. I don't know. I was just brought there. Q. You also refer to powerful business executives. What powerful business executives were you sexually trafficked to? MS. MCCAWLEY: Again, to the extent you can reveal somebody without a safety concern you're welcome to do that. SPECIAL MASTER: Well, again -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Right. I understand. SPECIAL MASTER: Same objection, same ruling. A. George Mitchell. Q. When were you sexually trafficked to George Mitchell? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 18 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 18 A. I am unable to give you times since we are going back a very long time ago. Q. Tell me the best that you can remember? A. Roughly when I was 17. Q. Where were you? A. New Mexico and New York. Q. Are there witnesses to this? A. Not to the actual event itself. Q. What other powerful business executives were you sexually trafficked to? A. Bill Richardson. Q. Are there witnesses? A. Besides Epstein instructing me to do so, no. Q. What other powerful business executives that you were sexually trafficked to? A. Yes, I know what you're saying. MS. MCCAWLEY: Take your time. Take a deep breath. A. Jean Luc Brunel. Q. Who else? MS. MCCAWLEY: To the extent you recall. A. I'm just trying to think. This is all very confronting for me. So at the same token I'm just trying to recollect everybody. The Dubins, Glen Dubin. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 19 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 19 Q. You said the Dubins, were you sexually trafficked to more than one Dubin? A. No. Q. Just to Glen? A. Just to Glen. Q. Is he the powerful business executive who's pregnant wife was asleep in the next room. A. Yes. Q. What other powerful business executives were you sexually trafficked to? A. None that I can remember off the top of my head. Q. Was Les Wexner one of the powerful business executives that you were trafficked to? A. Yes. Q. So you can remember others. Who else is there? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to that. That's inappropriate. She gave you everyone she could remember at the time when you mentioned a name. SPECIAL MASTER: Okay. Okay. Please move on without -- MS. BORJA: There's a question pending. A. I said yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 20 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 20 Q. What other powerful business executives? A. Wasn't that just objected? MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I can't remember off the top of my head, I'm sorry. Q. You also referred to prominent American politicians. What prominent American politicians other than the ones we've already named were you sexually trafficked to? A. The ones I just told you about, Bill Richardson and . Q. How many times were you trafficked to Bill Richardson? A. I don't know, over two times. Q. How old were you? A. Approximately 17, 18. Q. Are you sure you were underage during one of those incidents? A. I can't be 100 percent sure of anything. It's not like I recorded the dates. I'm just giving you an approximation. Q. How many times were you sexually trafficked to ? A. Twice that I can recall. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 21 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 21 Q. Were you underage during either of those? A. I believe so. Q. Both of them? A. I can't be 100 perfect sure. Q. When you were sexually trafficked to the prince were you underage? A. Not by England's standards. Q. You weren't in England, were you, you were in the South of France? MS. MCCAWLEY: Which prince? You need to clarify. A. Foreign prince, sorry. I believe I would have been 17. I don't know what their age -- MS. MCCAWLEY: You don't have to know. You don't have to know anything legal. Just answer the question the best you can. BY MS. BORJA: Q. So how old were you when you were sexually trafficked to Mr. Dubin? A. I don't know. Q. What is your best guess? A. I'm not going to speculate. Q. How many times did you have sex with Mr. Dubin? A. Once. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 22 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 22 Q. How many times did you have sex with Les Wexner? A. Multiple. Q. What's the approximate range of number, more than three? A. More than three. Q. More than five? A. Possibly. Q. More than ten? A. No. Q. Did Mr. Wexner ask you to wear any particular clothing during your sexual trafficking? MS. MCCAWLEY: Again, I'm going to object to this line of questioning. To the extent that you revealed something to me in work product circumstance or attorney-client privilege, I don't want you revealing that. This case is about the defamation between Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards and Mr. Dershowitz. It's not about the individuals other than Mr. Dershowitz who is the individual here who the judge said we're here to talk about the issues in this case, not the litany of other individuals. MS. BORJA: Counsel, we have limited time. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. I'm Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 23 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 23 going to deny the objection. You can answer the question. I'm going to give some latitude on this, but counsel, please understand it's some latitude. So you can answer the question. MS. BORJA: And Special Magistrate, I would also ask for an instruction, we have limited time here and speaking objections are inappropriate and unnecessary for your ruling. MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm allowed to make my record. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel, she needs to make the record, however, the four hours in my mind is not a hard and fast four hours based upon how we proceed in this deposition. So I'll take that into consideration as we approach the four hours. A. Yes, I wore lingerie for him. Q. At his request? A. It wasn't his request, it was Ghislaine who set it up for me. Q. And did she specify baby doll lingerie to be worn? A. All different types of lingerie. Q. Was it specifically Victoria Secret lingerie? A. I didn't write the brand. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 24 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 24 Q. Have you alleged that you were required to wear Victoria Secret lingerie for Les Wexner? A. No. MS. MCCAWLEY: Alleged in what context? BY MS. BORJA: Q. She's already answered. Now, other than the people you've already named for me today, were you sexually trafficked to anyone else during your period between 1999 and 2002? A. Yes. Q. Who else? MS. MCCAWLEY: To the extent you can recall. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel, let her think it through. A. Alan Dershowitz, Jean Brunel, the obvious people that I've already stated. , Jeffrey Epstein obviously, Ghislaine Maxwell, you know, there's people that I just -- I honestly can't think of everybody right now. I do feel like I am under a lot of pressure to answer the questions and I'm doing the best that I can honestly. Q. Were you sexually trafficked to Marvin Minsky? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 25 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 25 Q. Were you sexually trafficked to a man last name ? A. Who? Q. , if the name doesn't ring a bell, just tell me? A. No. Q. How many times were sexually trafficked to Marvin Minsky? A. Once. Q. How old were you? A. I don't know. Q. You're sure it was one time, correct? A. I'm not sure of anything. There was a lot of people that Jeffrey sent me to and it was a long time ago. I can't be a thousand percent correct on that. Q. Who is Marvin Minsky? A. He is an older gentleman. Q. Do you know what's does for a living? A. I think he's a scientist, but I don't want to 100 percent say. Q. Who is ? A. I think he's a r. Q. Do you know where? A. Possibly , I think, or maybe . I'm not too sure. I'm just speculating. - - - - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 26 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 26 Q. Where did you meet ? A. , at the islands. Q. And when you say the islands, do you mean Jeffrey Epstein's estate? A. Yes. Q. And where did you meet Marvin Minsky? A. Marvin Minsky was at the islands as well. Q. Did you ever meet him anywhere else? A. Yes. Q. Did you have sex with him in other locations? A. No. Q. Did you ever fly in a plane with him? A. No. Q. Did you ever have sex is Larry Summers? A. No, not that I know of. The name does not ring a bell. You have to understand that there were a lot of gentlemen that I was lent out to by Jeffrey Epstein. So it is very hard for me to remember all of their names and who they were and what they did. (Thereupon, Defendant's VR Exhibit No. 2, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Roberts, when you refer to , did you mean ? - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 27 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 27 A. No. Q. Have you ever met a ? A. Possibly. Q. Do you know one way or the other? A. Do I know? Q. You said possibly? A. I was introduced lots of political scientific, academic, so there is a possibility I could have met him. Q. Did you ever have sex with ? A. No. Q. Were you ever sexually trafficked to Nathan Nervelt? A. No, not that I know of. Q. I'm handing you a document that's been marked as VR Exhibit 2, which is Plaintiff, Virginia L. Giuffre's, I apologize, disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. This is a document that was entered in your lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Have you ever seen this document before? A. No. Q. If you take a look, there's a list of witnesses starting at page 1 and continues on? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 28 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 28 A. Yes. Q. I'm wondering whether this list might help you. Can you look at the names on this list and tell me who from these names you were sexually trafficked to? A. Number 7, Gwendolyn Beck. I wasn't trafficked to her. She was just a part of some of the trafficking. Q. Hold on. What part did she have in the trafficking? A. She was involved in some of the orgies. Q. So she was a sexual participant in the orgies? A. Yes. Q. That you were a participant in as well? A. Yes. Q. Were these orgies that Ms. Beck was involved in with any of the individuals that you have named so far today? A. Not that I can remember right now. Q. Do you know what gentlemen were involved in the orgies with you and Ms. Beck? A. As far as I can recall Jeffrey Epstein. Q. Okay. A. Number 9, , Sophie Biddle does ring a bell, but I don't want to 100 percent say that. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 29 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 29 Q. Ring a bell in terms of what? A. The name rings a bell. I mean, you have to understand there was a lot, a lot, a lot of girls around to remember all of their names. Q. My question is, was Sophie Biddle a participant in sexual activities with you? A. I don't know and I'm not going to speculate. Q. I'm not asking you to speculate. I'm asking you under oath today was she a participant, as far as you can recall today, in sexual activities -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt. BY MS. BORJA: Q. -- with you? A. I'm telling you under oath that I'm not sure about Sophie Biddle being in sexual orgies with me but the name does ring a bell. Q. And A. Yes, she was involved, but I'm not going to speak about her. She has the right to her own privacy. She's been hurt, she's a victim, so I'm not going there. Q. Did she participate in any of the sexual activities with others that you've named today? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 30 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 30 Q. With whom? A. I'm not answering that. MS. MCCAWLEY: We're going to object. To the extent that you're concerned about the safety of one of these individuals, we're not going to testify. We can go to the judge and we can come back if he says you have to testimony regarding that but -- MS. BORJA: We already have the names of the gentlemen. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. For purposes of the record, have you made your record? MS. MCCAWLEY: Well, let's make a record. So was underage at the time this occurred so she, herself, is a victim. So to the extent that, you know, if you want to bring her counsel in and have them present during something like this, that's fine, but this witness who is a non-party to this litigation who's a victim herself doesn't have to speak about other under-aged victims. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel? MS. BORJA: I'm entitled to know the names of witnesses who can either verify or discredit the allegations. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 31 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 31 MS. MCCAWLEY: She's given you the name. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel, let her make her record. MS. BORJA: As to specific individuals, and I do not want to bring up her name with individuals with whom she's not alleged to have had sexual activity, that would be unfair to this witness; but what would be fair to my client who is being sued in this case is to be able to check the allegations with a neutral third party, and if this is a witness -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Why don't you ask her if that's somebody who was involved with your client, which is what we're here on today, Alan Dershowitz, not all of these other individuals. SPECIAL MASTER: Okay. All right. Have you made your record? MS. BORJA: Yes. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to overrule the objection. I understand that you're going to instruct the witness not to answer, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes. SPECIAL MASTER: So that will have to be dealt with in front of Judge Lynch for a subsequent time because I do think that it's Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 32 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 32 incumbent upon, especially on this question, it's incumbent upon you to lay the predicate as to why you're instructing the witness not to answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: And I believe I have. SPECIAL MASTER: I understand. We're not here to do that. So I'm going to, for purposes of the record, I'm going to overrule your objection. And now make your instruction so we have a clean record to deal with. MS. MCCAWLEY: Sure. With respect to because she was an underaged victim at the time, I'm instructing you not to answer questions with respect to her other than identifying her as being one of the victims involved. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Are you going to follow your counsel's instructions? A. Absolutely. Q. And you understand that we're going to reserve the right to bring you back for another deposition in the event that the judge overrules your counsel's objections. Do you still want to keep abiding by those? A. Go for it. Q. I'm sorry? - - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 33 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 33 SPECIAL MASTER: Yes. Yes. A. No problem. Q. We were looking at the list of names and you were going through to see if they refresh your recollection as to the names of individuals to whom you were sexually trafficked? A. On page 3, number 11, . Q. Who is ? A. I think she also goes underneath the name Kelly Spamm, if it's the same woman that I'm thinking of and she was one of Jeffrey's, I would like to say, co-conspirators. She had sex with underaged girls and myself. Number 12, Jean Luc Brunel. He was not only a witness, but also another co-conspirator. Again, number 13, sounds familiar, but I'm not going to attempt to put her out of place and I'm not too sure. Q. Do you know who the names of the others are, Valdson Cotrin or Chauntae Davies, do you know who they are? A. Chauntae Davies I think I have heard of as another victim, but I don't recall meeting her. Q. Do you know who Valdson Cotrin is? A. No. Q. Okay. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 34 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 34 A. Number 19, Alan Dershowitz; number 22 Eva Anderson Dubin; number 23, Glen Dubin. Q. Before you move on, were you sexually trafficked to Eva Anderson Dubin? MS. MCCAWLEY: This has been asked and answered. SPECIAL MASTER: No, it has not. Overruled. A. No, I was not trafficked to Eva. Number 24, number 25, I believe are . Q. Let my ask you this, were you sexually trafficked to ? A. No. MS. MCCAWLEY: With a question pending, I think she's lost the question, Counsel. Ask the question. MS. BORJA: Okay, counsel, I'll ask the question. MS. MCCAWLEY: Thank you. BY MS. BORJA: Q. The question is, when you look at this list of names does it refresh your recollection as to who you were sexually trafficked to? A. Some of the people that I mentioned, yes. Q. Okay. So, let's continue reviewing the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 35 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 35 list. I'm looking for the names of the people that you allege you were sexually trafficked to? A. Okay. Number 26, Prince Andrew; number 27, Jeffrey Epstein; number 43, Shelly Harrison, she was an older woman who participated. Q. Participated in what? A. In sexual acts. Q. With whom? A. With Jeffrey Epstein. Q. How do you know that? A. I was there with her. Q. Okay, who else was there? A. Ghislaine Maxwell, Emmy Tayler. Q. Anyone else? A. No. Did I say Sheridan, number 38? Q. No. A. Okay, Sheridan is another one. Q. Is another what? A. Another older woman that was a part of the sexual endeavors. Q. With whom? A. Ghislaine, Jeffrey and me. Q. Anyone else? A. Number 46. Q. I'm sorry, I'm still talking about Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 36 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 36 Sheridan. When you said involved, you said involved with sexual activity with Ghislaine, Jeffrey and yourself. Was there anybody else involved? A. Not that I can remember. Q. Was this a single incident? A. No. Q. Okay. A. Number 46, Sarah Kensington, formerly known as Sarah Kellen, she was involved with, very heavily involved with lots of incidents of sex. Q. With yourself? A. With myself. Q. And who else? MS. MCCAWLEY: To the extent you can answer. If it's multiple incidents you can take them one at a time. A. It was multiple incidents so it's going to be nearly impossible for me to remember every one. But obviously Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Les Wexner, Brunel, Jean Luc Brunel. I'm sure there's more, but I just can't remember off the top of my head. Q. How do know that she had sex with Les Wexner? A. I was there. Q. How do you know she had sex with Jean Luc Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 37 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 37 Brunel? A. I again was there. Q. How many times did you and Les Wexner and Sarah Kellen have sex together? A. Once that I can remember. Q. Where were you? A. New Mexico. Q. Are there other witnesses? A. Number 48, , I can't pronounce her last name. Q. ? A. , yes. Q. Anyone else? A. Number 50, MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm sorry, I think she's moving on with the list. Are you still talking about the incident? BY MS. BORJA: Q. I understand was a witness to your sexual activities with Les Wexner in Mexico, is that not what you meant? A. Yes. Q. She was a witness? A. Yes. Q. Was a witness? - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 38 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 38 A. No, I'm sorry. I was moving on with the list. Q. What is the sexual incident involving A. Palm Beach and the Caribbean with Jeffrey, myself, possibly Sarah Kellen if I remember correctly, there was another girl, I'm pretty sure it was Sarah. Q. Were you sexually trafficked to anybody else on the list? A. I'll continue with the list here. Nadia Marcinkova I was not sent to her, but she was a part of it with Jeff Epstein, Marvin Minsky, Tom Pritzker. Q. Who is Tom Pritzker? A. He, I don't know exactly what he does, but I think he's some kind of academic. Q. Did you have sex with him? A. Yes. Q. How many times? A. Off the top of my head, just once. Q. Where were you? A. I believe Tom was at Mexico. Q. Approximately how old were you? A. Again, I don't know. Q. Are there any other witnesses? A. Not that I can remember. I mean, besides Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 39 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 39 Jeffrey asking me to give him a massage which involved sexual acts, I don't remember. Joanna Sjoberg was another victim of Jeffrey Epstein who witnessed sexual acts. Q. Witnessed sexual acts between you and somebody else? A. She is another victim that I would like to say that I wouldn't like to mention the stuff that happened to her. She's very sensitive about this stuff. Q. That's fine, but I'm wondering if she's a witness to sexual acts that you allege were between you and somebody else? A. Other than Epstein, no. I mean, she did see the meeting with Prince Andrew, but she did not witness the act with him. Q. Okay. A. Kelly Spamm is, I believe that be which is number 81, and I've already explained that one. Number 85, Emmy Taylor, she witnessed many acts of sexual abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein. Number 92, Larry Visosky is the pilot. I don't believe he witnessed anything, but he was flying during some of the times that sexual abuse encountered. Q. Do you know why Les Wexner is not on this - - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 40 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 40 list? A. I haven't seen this list before, so, no. MS. MCCAWLEY: This is a good time to take a break. MS. BORJA: The time is now 9:45. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record 9:49 a.m. (A recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video record 10:01 a.m. MS. MCCAWLEY: Did you mark this? MR. SCAROLA: Yes. MS. MCCAWLEY: That's 2. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Roberts, did you have an opportunity to talk to anybody other than Ms. McCawley during the break? A. Yes, I spoke with my good friends over there. Q. Who are? A. Brittany Henderson and -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Meridith. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Anyone else? A. Brad Edwards. I'm sorry, I forget he came in. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 41 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 41 Q. Now, do you have knowledge of Professor Dershowitz having sex with any minor girls other than, you claim, yourself? A. Yes, I don't know their names. Q. How do you know that? A. I witnessed it. Q. Where were you? A. On an airplane. Q. How many girls? A. One. Q. Describe her? A. Blond, young. Q. Anything else? A. No. Q. Where were you going on this plane? A. You know, it's hard for me to remember the exact destination. I was flying around a lot from the times I was with Jeffrey, but I believe it was to Massachusetts, if my memory is correct. Q. Why were you flying to Massachusetts? A. Again, I don't want to -- I don't know. I just flew wherever Jeffrey wanted fly to. Q. Did you stay in a hotel in Massachusetts? A. No, we flew in and flew out the same day. Q. Who else was on the plane? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 42 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 42 A. Epstein. Q. Where were you coming from? A. I believe it was New York, but again, I don't want to 100 percent say, like I said we were constantly flying. Q. Was it winter time, was it summer time? What do you recall about when it was? A. It wasn't snowing so I'm not too sure. This is going back a long time ago. I don't know the date. Q. What's your best recollection of how you were dressed? A. I don't know what I was wearing. Q. Did you have a sweater? A. I don't know what I was wearing. Q. Were you over 18? A. I don't know, I'm sorry. Q. You might have been? A. I could have been. I could have been under 18, over 18. Q. The other girl, she could have been over 18? A. She could have been, she could have not been. Jeffrey liked having a lot of young girls around him. I'm not too sure. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 43 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 43 Q. You don't know one way or the other whether the girl was a minor? A. I didn't ask her the age. Q. Other than the girl you're not sure whether she was a minor, are there any girls you are sure were a minor who you think had sex with Professor Dershowitz? A. Not that I know of. Q. So would it be correct that you actually don't know one way or the other whether Professor Dershowitz had sex with any minors other than you claim yourself? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. A. Yeah, I don't know. It would hard to say. Jeffrey, like I said, had lots of young girls around all the time and some of them were very young and some of them were on the cusp of 18, 19. So it's very hard to speculate how old exactly she was. Q. So you don't know? A. I don't know. Q. Other than yourself, Jeffrey, Professor Dershowitz and this other woman of unknown age, was anybody else on the plane besides the pilot? A. Pilot. Q. That's it? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 44 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 44 Q. Putting aside ages, whether they were minors or not, other than this one girl you say had sex with Professor Dershowitz on a plane, are you aware of any other girls with whom you believe Professor Dershowitz had sex? A. Professor Dershowitz was around a lot and there was always young girls around a lot and I physically did not see him with any other girls besides the ones that we're talking about right now and myself, but no, I'm not too sure. Q. You don't know of any, correct? A. Not that I physically witnessed. Q. How tall is Professor Dershowitz? A. I don't know. Q. Is he closer to 5'5" or 6"? A. Goodness, 5'5", 5'6", 5'7", he's not 6". Q. Does he have any distinguishing characteristics? A. Like are you asking me skin color? Q. Any distinguishing physical characteristics, whatever that might mean to you? A. He's older, he's -- I don't know what you mean. Like does he have a mole in a specific place, is that what you're asking me? Q. Anything that might occur to you? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 45 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 45 A. No, not that I know of. Q. Did you know who he was before you met him the first time? A. No. Q. Now, one of the places that you say you had sex with Professor Dershowitz was in New Mexico, correct? A. Yes. Q. When was that? A. Again, it's hard for me to place exact times and dates, but it wasn't snowing and it wasn't hot. So it could have been fall or spring. One thing that I do remember was Jeffrey was having his pool area painted and the massage room was just off the pool area. Q. What else do you remember? A. I remember the smell of paint. I remember later that evening there was a dinner party of a whole bunch of academic scientists, I guess, I'm not too sure. We weren't really allowed to have and make conversation with the people around us. Q. How many people were at this dinner party? A. I don't know the exact number, but over fifteen. Q. Anybody that you recall, anybody famous? A. No, nobody famous that I recall, I'm just showing that they are distinguished in their own way, but Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 46 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 46 besides Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Emmy Tayler, the house staff. Q. Now, you said there was a dinner party with scientists and academics? A. Yes. Q. Were any of the scientists and academics that we talked about early today at that party? A. Not that I remember. They could have been, but I was not there for anyone else. Q. How did you get there? A. By airplane, Jeffrey. Q. You flew privately for that event? A. Yes. Q. How did you leave? A. Privately. Q. How long were you there? A. Maybe anywhere between three days and a week. Q. So at least three days? A. At least three days. Q. Who else was on the plane with you? A. Jeffrey Epstein, Emmy Tayler, Ghislaine, myself, the pilots, possibly, Adam Perrylang, I can't remember. He was on the plane sometimes and sometimes not, so. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 47 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 47 Q. Can you spell Adam's last name? MS. MCCAWLEY: If you know. A. Off the top of my head, P-E-R-R-Y-L-A-N-G. Q. Who is Adam Perrylang? A. A chef. Q. Was Professor Dershowitz on the plane? A. No. Q. How did you know -- well, was this the first time you had met Professor Dershowitz? A. No. Q. How many times had you met him before this event? A. Dershowitz was around a lot. So I mean, I couldn't count how many times I've met him. Q. What's your best recollection? A. Are you asking me to guess? Q. I'm asking for your best recollection? A. I couldn't give you a number. I'm not too sure. He was around a lot. Q. When you say he was around, what do you mean by that? A. He obviously did a lot of work with Jeffrey. I'm not too sure what that work was. Q. Did you ever talk to him? A. I was introduced to him. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 48 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 48 Q. When were you first introduced to him? A. I believe the first time I was introduced to him would have been in New York. Q. Putting aside that first introduction, did you ever have a conversation with Professor Dershowitz? A. Besides formalities, no? Q. Did Professor Dershowitz tell you why he was in New Mexico? A. No. I'm assuming there for the conference or the get together, the politicians get together, not politicians, sorry, academic get together. Q. How did you know this was an academic get together? A. Because they were talking about, most of the things, I can't really understand, just scientific stuff. Q. Were you there for that portion of the evening? A. Yes. I ate dinner at the table. Q. Was there anything other than the dinner that was going on during this three-day to one week stay in New Mexico? A. Generally they're always was. I mean, I would do horseback riding, I would go for walks. If you're asking if there was another event, no, but that Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 49 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 49 was one of Jeffrey's places he liked to stay. Q. Where did Professor Dershowitz stay? A. Upstairs in the room. Q. How long did he stay? A. I'm not too sure. Q. What's your best recollection? A. I only remember seeing him there for a day? Q. And you didn't see him -- was this dinner party at the end of the your trip there? A. The first day. Q. So then after the first day you didn't see Professor Dershowitz again? A. I didn't see anyone else except for obviously Epstein, Maxwell, Tayler, the house staff. Q. How many people other than Professor Dershowitz stayed at the ranch during this trip? A. Nobody else stayed except for the people I just mentioned. Q. I'm sorry, I thought that Professor Dershowitz spent the night? A. He could have spent the night, but I'm saying I didn't see him the next day. I don't know if he left that day or I don't know if he stayed the night, but all the rooms were upstairs. If he would have stayed, he would have stayed upstairs. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 50 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 50 Q. So you don't know one way or the other whether he did stay? A. No, I don't know whether he did stay. Q. What year was this? A. I don't know. I was with Jeffrey from 1999 until 2002. So it's a broad spectrum of trying to remember times and dates. Q. You definitely remember this dinner party, right? A. Yes. Q. You remember that there were 15 or so academics and scientists, right? A. Yes. Q. And you remember that you had sex with Professor Dershowitz, right? A. Yes. Q. You remember everybody left after that dinner party, right? A. Yes. Q. So what would help you fix this in your mind, had you already met Prince Andrew before this dinner party? A. You know, I don't think so, but I don't think so. Q. Why do you say that? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 51 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 51 A. Because Prince Andrew happened when I was 17, you know. I can't 100 percent say if it happened before or after and me trying to pin point that down just wouldn't work. Q. Did you tell anybody about having sex with Professor Dershowitz? A. Besides Epstein? Q. So you told Epstein? A. Yes, Epstein. Q. Did you tell anybody else? A. Maxwell. Q. Anyone else? A. I told my boyfriend at the time that I had met him. Q. Who was your boyfriend at the time? A. Tony Figueroa. Q. You didn't say anything else other than you had met Professor Dershowitz? A. I told him I was very upset from one of the things I had to do but he didn't fully comprehend what I was talking about. Q. Did you tell anybody else? MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, can you set a time frame? BY MS. BORJA: Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 52 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 52 Q. At any time in your entire life? A. Oh, at any time? MR. SCAROLA: Are we excluding attorney/client privileged communications? BY MS. BORJA: Q. Other than your attorneys, did you tell anybody else? A. Yes, I told my best friend, Rebecca Boylan, my husband, Robert Giuffre, my mother, I think that's about it. Q. When did you tell your mother? A. Within the last couple of years. Q. What did you tell her? A. I didn't go into details with her. I just said that he's one of the people that abused me. Q. Did you say anything else to your mother about Professor Dershowitz other than generally he abused you? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. No, just I mean, obviously characterization about who he is and what he is, but I didn't go into details with her, if that's what you're asking. Q. What did you tell Rebecca? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 53 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 53 A. That he was one of my abusers. Q. Did you say anything else? A. About Dershowitz? Q. Yes. A. In regards to what? Q. Did you say anything else about Professor Dershowitz to Rebecca? A. I need a little more specifics. Did I tell her about the details? Q. Anything else about Professor Dershowitz, anything? I'm not excluding or narrowing it in any way? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. To the extent you can answer that. A. I told her who he was, I told her -- I might have told her specifics I'm not too sure. I can't recall. We're going back make over a year ago. Q. When did you have -- how many conversations did you have with Rebecca about Professor Dershowitz? A. It wouldn't be like full blown conversations like long talks about it. It would be more from girlfriend to girlfriend, just, you know, this is what's happening in my life. You know, these are one of the people that abused me. These are one of the people that I'd like to get brought to justice for it. She would ask me questions like, what happened? I explained Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 54 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 54 to her what's going on. I don't know how many times I've had conversations with her. Q. About Professor Dershowitz? A. About Professor Dershowitz. Q. Is Rebecca a truthful person? A. I used to think she was. Q. You don't think that now? A. No. Q. Have you had a falling out with Rebecca? A. Yes. Q. Have you called Rebecca and told her not to talk to Professor Dershowitz? A. Not in that way. I told her, I can't believe that you are talking to somebody, in my own words, a pedophile. Q. Did you tell her not to talk to anyone else about Professor Dershowitz? A. Did I tell her not to talk to anybody else about Professor Dershowitz, like talking about her husband? Q. Did you tell Rebecca not to talk to anybody about Professor Dershowitz? A. Did I tell Rebecca not to talk -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, to the extent you didn't understand the question you can ask for it Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 55 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 55 to be re-asked. A. Can you -- I don't understand what you're asking. Q. Why did you think that Rebecca was a truthful person in the past? A. I've known her since I was a kid and I love her like a sister. Q. In your experience in knowing her since you were a kid you found her to be truthful? A. Yes, I have. Q. When did you first tell Tony Figueroa about Professor Dershowitz? A. I believe I was on the island, Jeffrey's island. Q. What's your best estimate of when this was? A. I don't know. It's always hot in the Caribbean so I can't pin point a season. Q. Did you tell Rebecca that Professor Dershowitz, in your words, was a pedophile? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you tell anybody else that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Outside of the comments to the lawyer. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Other than your lawyers? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 56 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 56 A. The people that I've told you, my mom, my husband, as you said Rebecca, Michael, her husband might have been present on some of those conversations, but I'm not too sure if he was. Just my lawyers. Q. Did you ever tell the press that you had had sex with Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Any questions regarding the press were already quashed by the judge and we have an order standing on that so there will be no questions regarding the press. MS. BORJA: There is no such order from the Court. MS. MCCAWLEY: There is and I'll be happy to pass it out. SPECIAL MASTER: Can you please share? MS. MCCAWLEY: They issued a subpoena duces tecum and he quashed certain discovery requests and that's included, any discovery relating to press. Here is a chart that has the request for the ones that should be quashed. SPECIAL MASTER: I've read this. I've read -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Those that have the numbers he quashed. He quashed certain categories of discovery. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 57 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 57 MS. BORJA: Can I be heard? SPECIAL MASTER: Are you finished making your objection? MS. MCCAWLEY: I just want to be clear that there are certain categories of discovery that he quashed in response to my motion to quash this deposition, and he narrowed out categories that were not subject to discovery in this case for this non-party witnesses. SPECIAL MASTER: Okay. And I'm looking at both the order and a chart that was provided by MS. MCCAWLEY? MS. BORJA: That's a duces tecum. The judge ruled on the production of documents. The judge did not narrow the scope of testimony of a fact witness in that way. She was not required to produce certain documents. We're certainly entitled to check the veracity of the witnesses' testimony. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to overrule the objection. You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: Can we take a break? MS. BORJA: There's a question pending. You cannot take a break while there is a question pending. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 58 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 58 MS. MCCAWLEY: We are going to take a break because this is a judge's order and we're going to determine whether we need to call Judge Lynch at this time to deal with this order. So we are going to take a break at this time. MS. BORJA: I object to taking a break while there's a question pending. SPECIAL MASTER: Well, I'm going to let her take a break so she can make her record. I need to allow her to protect it. MS. BORJA: Can you put the time on the record? THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record. 10:23 a.m. (A recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video record 10:30 a.m. SPECIAL MASTER: There was a question pending. THE WITNESS: Would you like that to be answered now? MS. MCCAWLEY: Really quickly I want to make my record in advance of her answering that. We believe that the questions, this line of questioning is in violation of Judge Lynch's order Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 59 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 59 where he struck certain requests relating to the subpoena, and we have a standing objection to that that we'll take up with Judge Lynch, but at this time we'll allow her to answer the question subject to our ability to strike that testimony as a result of it being non-applicable here because of his prior ruling. SPECIAL MASTER: So you understand my ruling, I've reviewed, I've had an opportunity to review both the original objections made, the series of objections made to the duces tecum, the order, as well as the chart that was provided by Ms. McCawley with respect to what was stricken on the subpoena, and for the purposes of the record we'll go ahead and have this marked so we can preserve the record as to what I'm referring to, my ruling. MS. BORJA: We can make them a compellation Exhibit VR 3. (Thereupon, Defendant's VR Exhibit No. 3, was Marked for Identification.) SPECIAL MASTER: My ruling stands, and I don't have an issue with you having a continuing objection, but the witness now can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: Do you want the question Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 60 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 60 read back to you? THE WITNESS: No. Should I just go ahead and say it? SPECIAL MASTER: Go ahead and read back the question? (Last question read back by the court reporter.) SPECIAL MASTER: Subject to the continuing objection, you can now answer. A. I thought the question was if I ever called him a pedophile to the press. Wasn't that the question? SPECIAL MASTER: No. A. I did point him out to a journalist as one of my abusers. Q. What journalist? A. Sharon Churcher. Q. When did you do that? A. I believe it was 2011. Q. What did you tell Ms. Churcher? A. I just pointed him out. Q. What do you mean? A. I was given a picture to look at and he asked me which ones that I recognized as abusers and Alan Dershowitz was one of those. Q. How many pictures did you look at? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 61 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 61 A. I'm not too sure. Q. What's your best recollection? A. Over 40. Q. Did you pick out anybody else as one of your abusers? A. Yes. Q. Who was that? A. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel, Glen Dubin, Prince Andrew, I believe, that's all I can remember for now. Q. Was one of the pictures of Les Wexner? A. Possibly, yes. Q. Was one of the pictures Richardson, Bill Richardson? A. Again, possibly, yes. Probably, I'm not committing 100 percent to that, I can't remember exactly who she showed, but if they were there I would have pointed to them. Q. Was one of the pictures of ? A. Again, possibly yes. If they were there I would have pointed them out. Q. Where did these pictures come from, do you know? A. No. Q. Were the people that were in photos that Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 62 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 62 you did not identify as individuals to whom you had been sexually trafficked? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. A. Yes. Q. Tell me everything you can recall telling Sharon Churcher about being sexual trafficked to Alan Dershowitz when you met with her in 2011? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. I just want to be clear that I have a standing objection to this line of questioning. SPECIAL MASTER: So noted. You can answer. A. I just identified him. I don't think we actually got into any kind of details. It was going through a book of people kind of like the FBI does and pointing out. She was more interested in Prince Andrew. Q. You met with Ms. Churcher for about a week; is that correct? A. Yes. Q. During the course of that week did you give Ms. Churcher any documents? A. Yes, I had given her some pages out of a booklet that I had wrote concerning Prince Andrew. Q. What is this booklet that you wrote? A. She contacted me and asked me to recall the times that I was with Prince Andrew and I wrote them down Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 63 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 63 and I gave them to her. Q. When did Ms. Churcher first contact you? A. It would have been 2011. Q. What did she say when she first contacted you? A. She introduced herself. She asked me if I was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. She was interested in how he got away with so many counts of abusing minors, and seeing that I was one of the minors she wanted to talk about that; and when she came over or before she came over she asked me about some of the people I had been with. I had said, well, I've got a picture of myself with Prince Andrew and she was very interested and she came over and wrote the article. Q. Now, the picture that you had of Prince Andrew, that's an original photo that you developed, correct? A. Yes. Q. Do you still have the original? A. It's been passed around a lot. I'm not too sure if mine is the original or not anymore. Q. The photographs of you in New Mexico in the snow wearing your red jacket were those taken on your camera? A. Yes, my camera. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 64 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 64 Q. Do you have the originals? A. Again, between the FBI and giving them to my lawyers and Sharon Churcher, the circulation, I'm not too sure if I have the originals. I know I have copies. So I'm not too sure if they're the originals. Q. The booklet that you gave pages from to Ms. Churcher where is that booklet? A. Burned. Q. When did you burn it? A. In, I think it was 2013. Me and my husband had a bonfire. Q. What did you put in the bonfire? A. Any kind of memories that I had written down about all the stuff going on. Q. Had you written anything about Professor Dershowitz? A. He could have been there, yes. Q. And you burned that? A. I wanted to burn my memories. I wanted to get rid of it. It was very painful stuff. Q. Other than what you had written down did you burn anything else? I don't mean the wood, when you talk about burning your memories, what were you burning? A. I was burning like memories, thoughts, dreams that I had, just everything that was kind of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 65 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 65 affiliated with the abuse I endured, and there was a lot of it in there. My husband is pretty spiritual so he said the best thing to do would be burn them. Q. Is there anything you decided to keep and not burn? A. Just the photographs. Q. Anything else that you can think of? A. Photographs, that's it. Q. Approximately when in 2013 was this bonfire? A. I don't know what month it was. Q. Did you do it outside? A. Yeah, it was outside. I wasn't going to do it in my living room. Q. Did it feel good to be close to the fire because it was cold out or was it a summertime bonfire? A. I believe I had just bought my house in Titusville, Florida. I bought my house in, I think, I either got it October or November of 2013. It would have been around probably November. Q. Why did you decide to keep the photos? A. They're evidence. Q. Do you have any photographs of yourselves with Professor Dershowitz? A. No. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 66 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 66 Q. Do you have any photographs of yourself at any of the locations at the times that you allege Professor Dershowitz was there? A. Like there's not photographs of Dershowitz. Q. Showing that you were at the locations at the time that you say Professor Dershowitz was there regardless of whether or not he was in the photograph? A. I'm not too sure, I mean, it could have been the same week. I always carried around cameras so I took lots of pictures of everything. It could have been the same week, but he was definitely not in the photographs. Q. After you gave Ms. Churcher the pages from that booklet did she give you a copy of those back? A. I don't think so. Not that I remember. Q. You gave her the original pages? A. Yes. Q. Are those the same pages that showed up in Radar Online? A. Yes. Q. How did they get them? A. Not by me. Q. Did you get paid for them? A. No, not for those. Q. You got paid for Ms. Churcher's interview? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 67 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 67 MS. MCCAWLEY: Again, I just want to make sure that I have a standing objection to all of the testimony relating to the media. A. Specifically I got paid for the picture. Q. The picture of yourself with Prince Andrew? A. Yes. Q. Was there a contract? A. I believe so. Q. Who negotiated that? A. Just Sharon and myself maybe the place that she works, I'm not too sure. Q. You told the FBI that you got $160,000 for that, is that right? A. Yes. Q. And is that a correct statement? A. It was 140 and then for the articles $10,000, and then $10,000. Q. So how does the picture fit into that? A. What do you mean? Q. You said it was 160 for the photo? A. No, 140 for the -- Q. For the article? A. Well, for the photograph and articles and then for the other articles, I don't think she just printed one article, I think she printed like three Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 68 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 68 articles if I recall correctly, but for the other one it was $10,000 and then $10,000. Q. Were you paid for any other media interviews? A. No. SPECIAL MASTER: There is a standing objection to all this. MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did Ms. Churcher give you any documents? I know she showed you pictures, did she give you anything? A. No. Q. Did Ms. Churcher tell you anything about Professor Dershowitz? A. No. Q. Other than you've named your mother, your boyfriend, Mr. Figueroa? A. Yes. Q. Your friend Rebecca and Sharon Churcher? A. And my husband. Q. Your husband, and putting aside your lawyers, did you tell anyone else that you were sexually trafficked to Professor Dershowitz? A. The FBI. Q. What did you tell the FBI? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 69 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 69 A. I just remember -- my memory recalls they did show me a photograph of everybody, if he was in those photographs I would have pointed him out. I'm just saying I could have possibly pointed him out in the pictures. Q. But do you recall doing that? A. I just know there was a lot of pictures and if he was in there I would have pointed him out to them. Q. Do you recall having any discussions with the FBI about Professor Dershowitz? A. I had discussions about a lot of people with him and I specifically don't remember if it was just -- if Alan was included in those, but if he was I would have told them what I know. Q. Did you talk to the FBI more than once about Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, mischaracterizes the testimony. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. THE WITNESS: Does that mean go ahead? SPECIAL MASTER: Yes. A. I only met with the FBI one time, so no. Q. When you say that if you've been shown a picture you would have identified Professor Dershowitz you're talking about an in-person meeting in April 2011? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 70 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 70 A. I don't recall if it was April, but yes, I think it was 2011. Q. Shortly after the article in the Daily Mail came out? A. I think after about two weeks. Q. What else did you tell the FBI about being sexually trafficked? A. I've told them everything that I could remember at the time from the period of the years I was with Jeffrey Epstein. Q. Did you tell them about a prominent prime minister? A. Yes. Q. Did you tell them about heads of state? A. I'm not too sure what a head of a state is. Q. Did you tell them about prominent politicians? A. Yes. Q. Did you name them? A. Yes. Q. Did you tell the FBI about prominent business people? A. Yes. Q. Did you name them? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 71 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 71 Q. What were the names of the politicians that you gave to the FBI? A. The same names I've given to you. Q. What were the names? You gave the FBI the name Bill Richardson? A. Yes. Q. And you gave the FBI the name ? A. Yes. Q. Which prominent businessmen names did you give the FBI? A. Glen Dubin, I mean, we're going back over a list that's very hard to continually go over, but Jean Luc Brunel, Glen Dubin. I'm trying to remember, but I'm having a blockage. I'm sorry. Q. Did you name Les Wexner to the FBI? A. Yes. Q. Did you name any academicians specifically that you recall? A. I named . I mean, anyone that they would have pointed out to me and asked me I would have told them truthfully who I was with and what happened. I can't remember exactly who they showed me, I can't remember exactly who I told them about, but if they were there I would have told them. - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 72 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 72 Q. Did the FBI ask you about Bill Clinton or Al Gore? A. I do believe they did ask me about Bill Clinton, but I cannot remember the exact conversation we had about him. Q. I understand you were not sexual trafficked to Bill Clinton; is that correct? A. Correct. Q. Did Sharon Churcher ask you about Bill Clinton or Al Gore? A. I believe they did. Q. How many times did you meet Bill Clinton? A. Twice. Q. How many times did you meet Al Gore? A. Once. Q. You're meeting with Bill Clinton what was the first one? A. I don't know the exact date. I know it was towards the end of my period with Jeffrey. I'm sorry, I can't give you a date. Q. The end of your period with Jeffrey is September 2002, correct? A. That was, yeah, when I left. Q. That's the first time you meet Bill Clinton, towards the end of that period? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 73 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 73 A. No, it wasn't September. I'm not saying it was September. I'm saying it was around that period. If I was going to place times around something it would be towards the end of that. Q. Where were you the first time you met Bill Clinton? A. On Little Saint Jeff's, which is the island. Q. Little Saint James? A. He used to call it Little Saint Jeff's, sorry. Q. Meeting Bill Clinton? A. Generally or specifically about his personality? Q. Where were you on the island when you met him? A. We had a dinner together. Q. Who was at that dinner? A. Ghislaine, Emmy Tailer, Jeffrey Epstein, myself and two girls that I do not know who they are. Q. This is the meeting with Bill Clinton that's been described in press articles; is that correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Go ahead. You can answer. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 74 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 74 A. Sorry. Confusing legal stuff. Yes, I believe it has been circulated. Q. You had a second meeting with Bill Clinton? A. Yes. Q. When was that? A. I believe very close together, within weeks if not months. Q. Where was it? A. Little Saint Jeff's. Q. What were the circumstances of your second meeting with Bill Clinton? A. Very similar, I mean, there was a dinner, lots of laughing, lots of joking, it was just a dinner and then I didn't have to do anything with Bill Clinton, he was never sexually involved with me. I've never witnessed him sexually involved with anybody else. Jeffrey asked me for a massage after dinner and I went off to Jeffrey's cabana. Q. Who was at that dinner? A. Ghislaine, Jeffrey Epstein, myself, Clinton, I believe there were -- there were some other guys, they were down by the beach. I'm not too sure who they were. I assume they were security of some sort. They weren't there at the dinner. There were two girls. Q. So each time you had dinner with Bill Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 75 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 75 Clinton there were two girls; is that correct? A. From my recollection, yes, only two. Q. And describe the two girls at the first dinner? A. Young, beautiful like every girl that's generally around Jeffrey. Q. Are you able to identify them? A. Possibly if I was shown pictures, but I don't know their names. You need to understand, when I was with Jeffrey we were specifically told not to make friends, not to talk other than small talk. But we weren't like, hi, my name is Susan and I'm 15 or 19. We weren't like that. Q. Was there any security at this first dinner? A. Not at the table, but they always stayed around the beach. Q. Who were the two girls at the second dinner? A. It sounds funny, but I thought that they were sisters they looked so much alike. They had -- they were beautiful, they were youngish. I don't know exactly their age, but they were -- I don't know, it's hard to say, anywhere between 17 and 21, but I don't know their names. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 76 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 76 Q. Was it the first dinner that Ghislaine Maxwell flew the helicopter with Bill Clinton to the island? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer if you know. A. I was only told that. I'm not too sure if she actually did or not. I never witnessed Ghislaine flying him, but she said she did. Q. And did you hear Bill say that she was a good pilot? A. I remember her saying he thought she was a good pilot but I never witnessed it myself. Q. So it's possible she wasn't flying Bill Clinton in a black helicopter, that could be false? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. To my knowledge Ghislaine and Jeffrey talk a lot, they say things that are sometimes hard to believe. Some are actually true, so I don't know. Q. The second dinner, how did Bill Clinton get there? A. Either by boat or by helicopter. There's only two ways to the island. Q. So you don't know? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 77 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 77 A. No. Q. Tell me the circumstances of meeting Al Gore? A. It's a little hazy at where that took place. I mean, we are going back a long time ago, but I do remember one thing about him, I thought he was a wonderful guy who loved his wife and they spent the entire time like there was nothing else around them, it was just those two. It was a dinner table, a long dinner table with people around, but they were just lovely, just watching them as a couple. I remember thinking, you know, he's somebody that I would definitely vote for. He's just somebody that loves his wife that much. Q. What was the purpose of this dinner? A. As usual I'm not told these kind of things. I'm just kind of there to sit down and look pretty and keep my mouth shut. Q. Who else was there? A. I'm not too sure. Q. This was on the island, right? A. It could have been the island, but I could be mistaken if it was the island. It could have been New York. I'm not going to commit myself to saying it was definitely the island. My memory is still hazy when it Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 78 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 78 comes to locations or places. We were traveling everywhere a lot. Q. And I understand that at some point you were using Xanax, correct? A. Correct. Q. At some point you were up to eight Xanax a day, correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I was suffering a lot mentally coping with what was happening and when I took Xanax it helped me forget a lot of things that I didn't want to think about for that day and it did help. Q. At some point you were using eight Xanax a day as part of your -- A. To start with I was only taking one or two, but yes, it did get up to eight in the end. Q. Did it affect your ability to recall certain events? A. I would say any drug is going to do that to you. So, yes, you know, but I can tell you a thousand percent that just because I might not remember a location or a time doesn't mean I don't know a thousand percent the people that I was with or the people that abused me. Q. You told the FBI that it affected your Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 79 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 79 ability to recall certain events, correct? A. Yes. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Give me a chance to object. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Do you know approximately when you were up to eight Xanax a day? A. Towards the end. Q. What does that mean to you? A. Probably from 19 onwards or no, sorry, 18 onwards. Q. Were you using any other medications or drugs in order to address your pain and suffering? A. I did smoke marijuana and sometimes at parties I would use Ecstasy. Q. Anything else? A. No. Q. How often were you smoking marijuana? A. Considering I was with Jeffrey most of the time, not then, but whenever I went back to Palm Beach to see my boyfriend. Maybe once a week out of a month. Q. How often were you using Ecstasy? A. At parties. I don't know. I mean, it wasn't a regular basis, it was because if I was at a party with a whole bunch of kids. If it was there, I Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 80 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 80 would take it. Q. Did you use it during times what you were being sexual trafficked? A. No. Q. How often were these parties when you were taking it? A. How often were the parties? It varies, it could be -- like are we talking about yearly basis, because it wasn't every month. Q. Okay. During the time frame 1999 to 2002? A. Probably about fifteen parties. That's a rough estimate. No way is that a certain number. Q. Other than the marijuana, the Ecstasy, and the Xanax were there any other medications, or alcohol that you were using? A. Oh, alcohol, yes. I was drinking alcohol at the parties. Q. Did you drink alcohol outside of parties? A. Sometimes. Q. At the dinners? A. Sometimes. Q. Anything else? A. No. Q. Did you -- you mentioned that you were about one week in your apartment with Mr. Figueroa. Was Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 81 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 81 that a consist arrangement through the period? A. No, no, I'm just roughly saying that, you know, if I was home with Tony, at my apartment with Tony and it was for a week, that would be how long I smoked marijuana for. I wasn't saying specifically I was there for a week. It could have been three days, it could have been five days, it could have been seven days, I'm not too sure. Q. Between 1999 and 2002 how many places did you live? A. Like my own or like Jeffrey's residences? Q. Putting aside when you were staying at a home, one of the mansions that Mr. Epstein owned, how many places did you live? A. Just one. Q. That was an apartment building? A. Actually, let me correct that. At first I lived at my parents house and then I got an apartment. Q. You lived at that apartment the entire period between 1999 and 2002? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Go ahead. A. Besides my parent's house, yes, that's the only place I lived. Q. During what period did Mr. Figueroa live with you? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 82 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 82 A. On and off, but from, I don't know when our relationship actually started. I think I was with Jeffrey before. Yes, I was with Jeffrey already. Q. So on and off between 1999 and 2002? A. Yes. Q. Is Mr. Figueroa a truthful person? A. I believe so. Q. Why did you say -- what's the basis for your statement earlier that you didn't think Mr. Figueroa understood what you were telling him about Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. He was my boyfriend and I didn't really get into too much details with him. Q. But you specifically named Professor Dershowitz as one of your abusers? A. Yes. Q. Did you name other abusers to Mr. Figueroa? A. Yes. Q. Who did you tell him was sexually abusing you? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Mischaracterized the testimony. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer if you can. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 83 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 83 A. The same people that I've named to you. He wouldn't have understood some of the names, he wouldn't have known who they were, but anyone prominent such Prince Andrew, he would have recognized that. But generally I would call him every day when I was with Jeffrey and tell him what happened. Q. You would say the names of the people you had sex with? A. Sometimes, I mean, you know, sometimes I would just say I've had a really hard day, that is what I've had to do and we wouldn't get into names. Sometimes I would. Q. Tell me about the first time you met Professor Dershowitz? A. Are we talking sexually or just introduced. Q. The very first time you ever met Professor Dershowitz? A. I believe it was in New York in Jeffrey's office. Q. What were the circumstances of you being there? A. To please Jeffrey. Q. What were the circumstances of Professor Dershowitz being there? A. No idea, I never asked about the business. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 84 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 84 Q. Who else was there? A. House staff, Ghislaine, Emmy. Q. In this office with yourself Professor Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein? A. I don't know exactly who was in there. I'm just saying who was at the house. I'm not too sure who was in the office. I remember being introduced to him in Jeffrey's office, and no, I cannot recall anyone else being there. Q. What office is there? A. In his mansion in New York. Q. Can you tell me where that office is? A. Up a flight of stairs to your left. Q. How long was this meeting? A. Short, brief. I was already in there with Jeffrey when Dershowitz walked in and I was introduced. Q. How long was this meeting? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer if you can. A. Ten, fifteen minutes. Q. When was the next time that you met Professor Dershowitz? A. This is very hard for me to remember. Like I said, he was around a lot so I've seen him in Palm Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 85 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 85 Beach, I've seen him in New York. So I mean, if we're going to pin point how many times I've seen him or the next time I saw him after that I don't know. Q. Then tell me -- let's do it this way, what was the most recent time that you recall having sex with Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. The first time I recall having sex with Professor Dershowitz was in New York. Q. My question was, the most recent time now. What's the most current, most recent memory of having sex with Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Just so I'm clear, you're going backward? MS. BORJA: Correct. MS. MCCAWLEY: The last time. A. The last time that I remember having sex with him? Okay. I believe it was on an airplane. Q. Where were you going? A. On, I believe it was Massachusetts. I don't know. It's very hard for me to remember exactly where we were going, what were the circumstances. Q. So that's the time you testified about earlier? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 86 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 86 A. Yes, ma'am. Q. What was the time prior to that? A. You know chronologically it's impossible for me to place these in order. I can tell you about events, but if we're going to say chronologically, correct, it would be impossible. Q. Well, you say there was six times, right, you were very specific about that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: Let her get her question out. Go ahead. BY MS. BORJA: Q. You're very specific about that, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I am specific about the fact that I know I have been with Alan Dershowitz at least six times, if not more. Q. So let's talk about what you know about those six times. Let's start with, you can pick any one other than the flight that we've talked about? A. Okay. New York. Q. Okay. Let's start with New York? A. I was upstairs in Jeffrey's room with Jeffrey. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 87 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 87 Q. When you say Jeffrey's room, do you mean his bedroom? A. Yes. Q. Okay. A. There's a shower in the middle of that room and I had just finished having a shower with Jeffrey. Jeffrey got out of the shower, got dressed and left the room. He was wearing sweat pants if I recall and while I'm undressed and drying myself off and drying my hair Dershowitz entered the room and there was some red velvet chair that I remember -- I don't know, is there a certain language you want me to use to describe these events? Q. No. MS. MCCAWLEY: Just use whatever you're comfortable with, that's fine. A. We had sexual intercourse on the chair while I was bent over. Q. How long did that last? A. Less than ten minutes. Q. Did you speak to the Professor? A. Just formalities, but at this time Jeffrey had before trained me to do what he wanted me to do. Q. When you say just formalities, what do you mean? A. Hi, nice to see you again, how are you? I Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 88 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 88 mean, that could have not been exactly what was said, but those are generalities of what was said. Q. Who else was in the house at this time? A. Epstein for a fact. I'm not too sure about Ghislaine and Emmy, they could have been. Definitely house staff. Q. Who? A. Joe Joe and there was another Philippine lady, I'm not too sure. Q. How often were you sexual trafficked in Jeffrey Epstein's private bedroom? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Which bedroom are you talking about? BY MS. BORJA: Q. The same bedroom in New York that you were talking about? A. That's actually the only time besides with Jeffrey. I mean, Jeffrey countless, but there was no other men brought to Jeffrey's room. Q. Who brought Professor Dershowitz to this room? A. I have no idea, I'm assuming Epstein. Q. Help me figure this out. Epstein had just left the room? A. Epstein exits the room, Dershowitz walks Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 89 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 89 in. Q. Same door? A. Same door. Q. How long before Jeffrey exiting and Professor Dershowitz walking in? A. Minutes, not even, approximately 60 seconds. Q. Ten minutes later once the sex encounter ends, what happens next? A. He pulled up his pants and I put my towel back on. I went upstairs to my room -- my room was downstairs, had another shower, I got dressed. I don't remember the rest of the day from there. Q. Did you see Professor Dershowitz in the house again that day? A. On that day? Q. Right. A. Possibly, I mean, I don't remember. I just remember that event very clearly. Q. So it was unusual that somebody other than Jeffrey to whom you would be sexual trafficked would walk into Jeffrey's bedroom, is that fair? A. Yes. Q. Did you ask anybody how that came to be? A. No, it was expected of me. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 90 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 90 Q. Did you talk to Jeffrey about it? A. Yes. Q. What did you tell Jeffrey? A. Jeffrey asked me if he enjoyed it, I said yes. Q. So the act was consummated? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. What does consummated mean? MS. MCCAWLEY: If you don't know you don't answer. SPECIAL MASTER: Rephrase that. BY MS. BORJA: Q. What do you mean by your testimony that Professor Dershowitz enjoyed it? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Mischaracterizes the testimony. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer if you can. A. I don't even understand. What do you mean, did he enjoy it? MS. MCCAWLEY: Take a deep breath. She can re-ask the question. A. He enjoyed it, yes. From what it looked like, my God, yes, he enjoyed it. Q. Why do you say that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Take a deep breath. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 91 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 91 A. He ejaculated. He was happy. Q. Tell me about the next incident that you can recall of the sex? MS. MCCAWLEY: Do you want to take a break? THE WITNESS: Yes, absolutely. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's take a break, five minutes. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record, 11:11 a.m. (A recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video record 11:31 a.m., disk number 2. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Is there anything else that you can recall that would help you to place the time frame of this sexual encounter of Professor Dershowitz in New York? A. No, not that I can remember. Q. Do you recall whether it was before or after the first time you met Prince Andrew? A. Before. Q. About how long before do you think? A. I don't know. It was fairly early on in my relationship with Jeffrey that I first met him, but it was after my training so I'm not too sure. Q. And your training was about nine months, is Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 92 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 92 that fair? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. No, my training wasn't about nine months. MR. SIMPSON: Can you ask her to speak up just a little bit? I'm having a hard time hearing. MS. MCCAWLEY: Okay. We'll do our best, but she got sick during the break. Let's just be happy that we're here and we're getting this. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's move on. Let's move on, please. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 4, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Roberts, I've handed you a document that's been marked as VR 4 which is dated April 7th, 2011 and it reflects on the top, participant Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, Virginia Roberts, and the document has a bates number non-party VR 178 through 200. Do you have that? A. Yes, I do. Q. Have you seen this document before? A. Yes, I have. Q. Did you see a draft of this document before Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 93 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 93 this version? A. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Q. Have you seen more than one version of this transcript of the telephone conference? A. Not that I'm aware of. Q. Do you recall receiving a draft and making any edits to it? A. Not that I'm aware of. There's a lot of documents that I've gone through so it's a possibility. Q. You say you've seen it before, correct? A. Yes. Q. When did you first see it? A. I don't know the first time I saw it. I remember seeing it recently, but I don't remember the first time I saw it. Q. Did you see it shortly after your telephone conversation with Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Can we have a time frame on this document, please? SPECIAL MASTER: Could you please recite a time frame? BY MS. BORJA: Q. You had a telephone conversation with Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards in April 2011, do you recall Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 94 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 94 that? A. I recall the telephone conversation, yes. Q. And after you had that telephone conversation did you see a transcript of the conversation? A. I don't know. I don't remember. Q. Have you actually read this document? A. Yes, I have. Q. Is the document accurate to the best of your knowledge? A. Yes, I mean, there's a couple small things like my middle name is not Louise, I wasn't living in Australia for 19 years, but for the most part everything else is pretty correct. Q. If you turn to page 10 of 23? MS. MCCAWLEY: They're numbered at the top, at the very top in the corner. You see there? A. Yes. Q. Do you have that page? A. Yes, I do. Q. About halfway down the page Mr. Scarola asked you, okay, and how long after you first met Jeffrey did he first ask you to provide services for one of his friends? You answered, about nine months I think it was. It wasn't a full year, it wasn't six months, it was Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 95 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 95 between six months and a year which is why I'm saying nine months. Do you see where I am reading? A. Yes, I do. Q. Is that truthful and accurate? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. It's as close to what I can remember, but I hadn't given it much thought at that time, but it's close. Q. Well, within 60 days of this telephone call you had met with Ms. Churcher, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Within 60 days? We are talking about before the telephone call or after the telephone call? Q. You met with Ms. Churcher before the publication of the Daily Mail article in March 2011, right? A. Right. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. And you met with her for about a week, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. I have an objection to all line of questioning relating to Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 96 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 96 the media. SPECIAL MASTER: I understand. Proceed. You can answer. A. Yes, and that was her, must have been March if that's the date she called. Q. And during the week that you met with Ms. Churcher she showed you photos of people, correct? A. Yes. Q. And you thought about whether they were abusers, correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. And she talked to you -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Sorry, let me have my objection. If you can pause for a moment. Go ahead. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. You did answer. Move forward. BY MS. BORJA: Q. And she talked to you about your time with Jeffrey Epstein and being sexually trafficked; is that correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 97 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 97 Q. And then an article came out about it, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. Yes. Q. And people called you about that article, correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. Yes. Q. And so you had a meeting for a week, you looked at pictures, you talked to Ms. Churcher, an article came out, you talked to people, and this is happening right around February, March 2011, correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Yes. Q. And now April 7th you have a telephone call with Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards, correct? A. Yes. Q. So you had had time with Ms. Churcher, with your friend calling, with the article to think about these activities, correct? A. Yes. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. And your best recollection in April of 2011 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 98 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 98 was that about nine months, it wasn't a full year, it wasn't six months, but between six months and a year, which is why I'm saying nine months. That it was your best recollection as to the time frame at that point after you first met Jeffrey when he asked you to provide services for one of his friends. Is that fair? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. As you can see in that answer I'm not even sure. It wasn't six months, but between six months and a year which is why I'm saying nine months. It was an assumption. Q. Was it your recollection at the time? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. It was my best assumption. It could have been three months for all I know, it could have been six months for all I know, but it's an assumption. Q. It could have been a year for all you know, then, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. No. Q. Why is three months fair and twelve months not fair? A. Because it wasn't that long. Q. But has your memory improved since 2011? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, argumentative. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 99 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 99 Go ahead. A. Going through everything that I have gone through over and over and over again, yes, it has. Q. So is your memory improving over time about the events? A. It's not improving. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, sorry, let me just -- objection, argumentative. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. It's not that it's improving over time, but the more that I talk about it, the more I am able to remember stuff. Q. Are there things that you remember now that you didn't tell Ms. Churcher in your interview? A. Definitely a possibility. Q. You don't know one way or the other? A. She didn't ask me everything and I didn't tell her everything. Q. Why did she call you, do you know? A. I think I've answered this previously, haven't I? SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer it again. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer it to the extent you can recall. A. She called me because she was interested in Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 100 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 100 the Jeffrey Epstein saga, so to speak. Q. Did Ms. Churcher tell you she had talked to anybody else before she talked to you? A. Like in order to get my number or? Q. No, about the same subject matter that she was asking you about? A. I'm not aware of her conversations with other people. Q. I'm asking you what she told you. Did she tell you she had talked to other people? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. A. I'm thinking. I can't recall a specific person that she said, but I'm sure she did talk to other people about this. I know she talked to the Daily Mail to see if we could run the story. Q. After you gave the telephone interview to Mr. Scarola did you call him and say anything that you told him was wrong, incorrect I should say, from your telephone conversation? A. No, not that I can remember, no. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 5 was Marked for Identification.) MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to this. This has pictures of Virginia's children on this Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 101 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 101 and we have safety concerns here. We're not going to be putting this in the record, and I think any line of questioning regarding her kids or identification with respect to them is absolutely inappropriate. She's a non-party witness, she's a sexual abuse victim, and injecting her children into this is inappropriate. MS. BORJA: I'm still going to mark this as an exhibit. This is under seal and if you want to take other steps after this that's up to you. THE WITNESS: What do my children -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Hang on, take a deep breath. It's okay. We'll handle it. SPECIAL MASTER: So explain to me why? MS. BORJA: I asked haven't any questions yet. SPECIAL MASTER: Well, explain to me about the exhibit. You can mark it, but we're going to keep it. I'm going to tell you what, other than after the lawyers see that, let's put the copies here and we're going to hold those separately and apart from the rest of the exhibits because I tend to agree with Ms. McCawley's concern on this. So proceed with the question on that grounds. BY MS. BORJA: Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 102 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 102 Q. Ms. Giuffre, the document that's been marked as VR Exhibit 5 is a compellation exhibit with two pages from a Facebook profile. Do you have that? A. Yes, I do. Q. Is this a Facebook profile that you created? A. Yes, it is. Q. Did you input pictures into it? A. I sure did. Q. Is page 1 an accurate depiction of your Facebook profile? A. Yes. Q. And the second page of this exhibit, it says Virginia Giuffre, November 11, 2013. Do you see that? A. Where am I looking at? Q. At the top under the name Virginia Giuffre, it says November 11, 2013. Do you see that? A. Yes, I see that. Q. And is this an entry that you made into your Facebook account? A. Yes. Q. You posted the picture? A. Yes. Q. Do you know below the first entry under the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 103 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 103 photos says high buddies, we'd love to hear from our pen pals across the sea. Our new address is, and it states an address there and goes on. Do you see where I'm reading? A. Yes. Q. Did you make that entry into your Facebook profile? A. Yes. Q. And is this a true and accurate depiction of that entry that you made? A. Yes. SPECIAL MASTER: Is that it? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to ask to the extent that the exhibit gets used at all that every picture of her children is redacted. If you want to leave the date, that's fine. THE WITNESS: Can I also ask why -- SPECIAL MASTER: Hold on one second. MS. MCCAWLEY: It's okay. SPECIAL MASTER: Do you have an objection to the redaction of the children? MS. BORJA: I do in this regard, and I would like to make my objection on the record without the witness present. SPECIAL MASTER: Without the witness Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 104 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 104 present? MS. BORJA: Correct. SPECIAL MASTER: All right. Let's hold that because I don't want to lose this. We'll go back to that on the next break. When the witness takes a break we'll go ahead and put that on the record, but in the meantime let's go ahead and put the exhibit -- you hold yours and we'll hold the rest of them there. MS. BORJA: There's several copies here. SPECIAL MASTER: Put them there. Ms. McCawley, as a officer of the Court will you take those exhibits and then on a break put them in an envelope and mark them and I'll seal them right away so this way you can take provisions on that. MS. MCCAWLEY: Okay. SPECIAL MASTER: Thank you. And then we can go ahead at the next break you can make your objection at that point. Go ahead, proceed. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Roberts, we've been talking about when you claimed you were sexually trafficked to Professor Dershowitz and you talk about three of the incidents that are reflected in the joinder motion. Let's go through the other three. Pick any of them? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 105 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 105 A. Which ones have I told you about so far? Q. You had mentioned on a plane, New York, and New Mexico? A. Okay. Let's to go Palm Beach. Q. When was this? A. I don't have a significant date for you. Q. Was it before or after you met Prince Andrew? A. Before. Q. How do you know that? A. Because I hadn't met Prince Andrew at that time. Q. What do you recall about -- that helps you place the time of this meeting in Palm Beach? A. It's Florida, it's sunny, it's always hot. I have no idea. Q. Do you have any idea when it was? A. No idea. Q. How do you know it's before you met Prince Andrew? A. I hadn't met Prince Andrew by then. I don't know how else you want me to answer that. Q. Well, if you have no idea when it is? A. I'm telling you. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, argumentative. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 106 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 106 SPECIAL MASTER: Let her get a question out. Let her get a question out then you can object. BY MS. BORJA: Q. What markers are you using to identify for yourself it was before -- let's say you met Prince Andrew in March 2001 how are you able to know that this event in Palm Beach was before March 2, 2011? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, assumes facts not in evidence. You can answer. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I recall meeting Prince Andrew and it was a very significant event and I can tell you it was before I met Prince Andrew. Q. How many times after you met Prince Andrew were you sexually trafficked to Professor Dershowitz? A. I don't know. Q. Were there any? A. I cannot chronologically give you the answer to that, I'm sorry. There is no way for me to do that. You know, could there have been times after Prince Andrew that I was with Dershowitz absolutely, but do I know for a fact no, I don't. Q. Is that true for all six? A. Yes, that's true for all six, I don't know. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 107 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 107 Q. Who else was there in Palm Beach? A. Same people, Jeffrey, Ghislaine, Juan Alessi, he's the butler. I'm trying to remember if Emmy Tayler was there. I'm pretty sure she would have been. She was always with Ghislaine. No one else significant that I can remember. Q. So that's four instances. What are the other two? A. So I've given you Palm Beach, New Mexico, there's the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint Jeff's. Q. Who else was there? A. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, I possibly want to say Adam Perrylang was there as the chef, Miles Caffe, I think that's it. I mean there's a possibility that there could have been another girl there, but I can't remember. Q. Who is Miles? A. He's like a house staff. Q. What's your best recollection as to the time of year this was? A. Well, like Florida the Caribbean is very hot all year round so it's hard to depict what time of year it was. Q. I understand it's hard. What's your best recollection as you sit here today under oath? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 108 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 108 A. That's what I'm trying to tell you is I don't know. I don't know because it doesn't get cold in the USVI so there's no way to really tell you it was winter or fall or spring or summer because it's always hot. Q. Where did you go next after that trip? A. I don't know. Q. How long was Professor Dershowitz down there? A. I think he was there from, just from any recollection two days. Q. Where did he stay? A. In one of the villas. He would have had to. Q. Where did you stay? A. In another one of the separate rooms. Q. When you were in Palm Beach, the time that you mentioned previously, how long was Professor Dershowitz there? A. I don't know. I had my own apartment in Palm Beach. I was called in for him. Q. How do you know you were called in for him? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I normally got phone calls when I was in Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 109 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 109 Palm Beach when I was at my apartment to come in to give someone a massage. Q. Did any guests get massages that were not sexual in nature? A. Not that I was aware of. All the massages I gave were of a sexual nature except for Eva Anderson, sorry. I'm sorry, Eva Dubin, sorry. Q. Did you ever see any male masseuses? A. Once when I was at the island. He was there helping me train. Q. Were that massages and that masseuse sexual in nature? A. No, but it was a training. Not that kind of training, actual massage training. Q. Were there ever any masseuses over the age of 25? A. Yes, I think her name is Sheridan. Q. Were there ever any over the age of 30? A. The male one that we just talked about is over 30. Q. Can you recall any others? A. No. Q. Do you know one way or the other whether there were any other masseuses over the age of 30? A. Do I know of any other masseuses over the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 110 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 110 age of 30? Q. That were providing massages to Jeffrey Epstein? A. Just the male that was teaching me on the USVI and Sheridan, but she was also involved in sexual acts. She wasn't over the age of -- she could have been around 30, but she would have been over 30. Q. Did you keep a list of the masseuses who came to Epstein's properties? A. No. Q. Did some of them come only once? A. Uh-huh. Q. Are there some that came when you weren't there? A. I wasn't there, how am I to know. Q. You don't know if any came as a masseuse while you were not at Jeffrey Epstein's property? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. A. I wasn't there so I couldn't have. Q. What's the sixth incident that you say happened where you were sexually trafficked to Professor Dershowitz? A. We've talked about New York, we talked about Palm Beach, New Mexico, U.S. Virgin Islands, talked Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 111 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 111 about we took the airplane? Q. Yes. A. There was an instance in a car, but it was more -- it wasn't intercourse, it was more -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Use a term you're comfortable with. A. More oral is the good term to use, oral sex. Q. Where were you? Where was his car, what city, what state, what jurisdiction? Where were you? A. This was in Massachusetts. It was a black limousine. Q. Who else was in the car other than yourself and Professor Dershowitz? A. Jeffrey Epstein and another young girl. Q. How many people participated in the sexual activity in the car? A. Including myself? Q. Uh-huh. A. Four. Q. Where was everybody in the car? A. Sitting down. Q. Were people -- was this a town car, was this a limousine? A. Like a long limousine. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 112 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 112 Q. Where was the car going? A. To Mr. Dershowitz' house. Q. Where was it coming from? A. An airport. Q. When was this? A. I don't know. Q. What's your best recollection? A. It wasn't snowing. It wasn't hot. So I would like to say -- I'm trying to think of the trees around, but I don't know, maybe spring. Q. Why were you going to Professor Dershowitz' house? A. Jeffrey and him were doing some business. They were doing something at his house. Nothing sexual happened at his house. Q. Did you go in Professor Dershowitz' house? A. Yes, I did. Q. How long were you there? A. Not even twenty minutes, half an hour. Q. What did you do while you were in the house? A. I sat in, I don't know, a foyer with another girl and Jeffrey and Dershowitz went to a different part of the house. There was a desk there and we just sat, not sat, stood in the foyer. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 113 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 113 Q. Who was this other girl? A. I don't know who she is. Q. Had you ever met her before? A. No. Q. When you were coming from the airport had you flown in? A. Yes, me and Jeffrey and the girl had flown in, Dershowitz had not. Q. How did he get into the limousine? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Where did he get into the limousine? A. At the airport. Q. He was not on a flight with Mr. Epstein? A. Not on this occasion. Q. Did you tell anybody about this incident in the car? A. Like anybody that I know personally? Q. Anybody in the world? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection to the extent you relayed something to your lawyer. You can say that you told your lawyers but you can't discuss what you said. SPECIAL MASTER: Other than -- Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 114 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 114 A. No, I told my lawyers. Q. Did you tell anybody about it closer in time to the event? A. Like my boyfriend or something like that, no. Q. After you left Professor Dershowitz's house where did you go? A. Back to the airport. Q. Where did you fly in from? A. I believe it was New York. Q. When you went back to the airport where did you go? A. I believe, see, that's the hard thing. I want to say either New York or Palm Beach. I'm no 100 percent sure. Q. So I understand the time frame, did you fly in on a private jet or commercial? A. Private. Q. You flew out again on private? A. Yes. Q. So the time frame is that you and Jeffrey were on the plane? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. Yes. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, mischaracterizes Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 115 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 115 the testimony. Go ahead. A. Yes, me and Jeffrey were on the plane together. Q. And the girl was on the plane? A. Yes. Q. Anybody else? A. The pilots. Q. So the three of you took the flight, correct? A. Yes. Q. And you flew into an airport in Massachusetts? A. Yes. Q. Then you took a limousine to the Professor's house and you were there for about ten minutes, is that right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Go ahead. A. About 20, 25 minutes. I didn't look at my watch. Q. A very brief period of time? A. Very brief. Q. And then you went back to the airport and you flew out? A. Yes. Q. And you flew back either to New York or to Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 116 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 116 Palm Beach? A. It could have yeah, it could have been either-or, I'm not too sure. Q. But one or the other? A. Yes. Q. When you flew back out was anybody else on the plane other than yourself, Jeffrey, and this girl? A. Actually the girl stayed behind, it was just Jeffrey and I that went back. Q. Did the girl leave in the limousine with you and Jeffrey back to the airport? A. No. Q. She was left at Professor Dershowitz's house? A. She stayed there. Q. Do you know why she was staying there? A. I don't ask questions. Q. Did you talk to her when you were in the foyer with her? A. Like I said, we basically just have not real conversations, not girlfriends sitting down talking to each other just, I don't know, brief conversation. Q. Did Mr. Epstein arrange for the limousine or did somebody else? A. Maybe one of his assistants. Jeffrey Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 117 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 117 rarely arranged everything himself, usually had somebody else do it for him. Q. And was there anybody else in Professor Dershowitz' house other than the people that you've mentioned, Jeffrey, the girl, and yourself? A. I didn't see anybody. Q. Was this in the morning, at night, what time was this? A. After noonish, like after the noon period. It wasn't dark. Q. Did you have anything to eat for lunch? A. Not that I remember. I mean, I'm sure we did. We didn't go out to lunch. We didn't stop at any restaurant or anything like that. Q. Other than Professor Dershowitz' house did you stop anywhere during this trip? A. No. Q. Was this during a weekday or a weekend? A. No idea. Q. Were you able to see the driver while you were in the car? A. No, there was a black, like a window. Q. Was it closed the entire time? A. That I can remember, yes. Q. Did you ever fly commercially to any of the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 118 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 118 locations when you claim you were sexually trafficked to Professor Dershowitz? A. I did used to have to fly commercially to go service the men that Jeffrey sent me to, but I don't remember having to fly commercially for Alan Dershowitz. Q. Now, other than your conversation with Ms. Churcher before the first Daily Mail article came out, did you talk to her again about where you mentioned Alan Dershowitz? A. Before I spoke to her? Q. No, since that article came out? A. Have I talked to her again about Alan Dershowitz? Q. Correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: I object to this line of questioning. I think I have a standing objection, just to make that clear. A. Yes, I think we actually have. I think she read the recent, well, not so recent, about a year ago the statements made in the press and she called me up and I told her that I was not allowed to discuss it. Q. What did she say to you? A. She was just asking me about the ongoing proceedings and I said I don't think I'm able to comment. I don't think it's a wise thing to do, especially her Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 119 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 119 being a journalist. Q. Have you ever e-mailed with Sharon Churcher? A. Yes, I have. Q. How many times? A. I don't know, a lot. Q. What does a lot mean to you? A. Over twenty. Q. When was the last time you e-mailed with her? A. Probably in 2015. Q. Do you know approximately how many times you e-mailed with her in 2015? A. Maybe about five. Q. Before 2015 was there a long gap in your e-mail? A. Yes, there was a long gap. Q. Did you e-mail with her around the time leading up to the meeting that you had before the first Daily Mail article? A. I think that was actually phone conversations, not e-mails. Q. After you met with her the first time did you then e-mail with her? A. Yes, then we e-mailed. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 120 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 120 Q. About how many times, putting aside the five or so in 2015? A. About anywhere between ten to fifteen. I'm not too sure of the exact number but -- Q. Were you e-mailing with her while you were living in Australia? A. Uh-huh. Q. And were you e-mailings with her while you were living back in the United States? A. Uh-huh. Q. Yes? A. Yes, sorry. Q. Have you e-mailed with any other press regarding Alan Dershowitz? A. No. Q. Actually did your e-mails with Ms. Churcher refer to Alan Dershowitz? A. No. Q. Did your e-mails with Ms. Churcher specifically identify any alleged sexual abuser other than Mr. Epstein? A. Prince Andrew, that's it. Q. Had you had any e-mails with anybody about Alan Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 121 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 121 extent that this reveals anything that you have e-mailed with your lawyer. You don't have to testify to that. A. Besides with my lawyers, no. Q. Did you ever e-mail Rebecca about Professor Dershowitz? A. I am pretty sure we had phone conversation, actually no, face to face conversations about him and maybe some comments over the phone, but I do not recall sending her any e-mails regarding Alan Dershowitz except for the text messages I sent to her after I learned she was talking to him and I said, I don't believe you're talking to a pedophile. Other than that, no. Q. How many text messages did you send to her? A. What, from the time I've known her? Q. No, regarding Professor Dershowitz? A. Max, well, I mean the first one I sent to her was about him and then, you know, the other ones were quite simple like, you know, you've got two precious daughters, you know. I don't know if he was actually named in any of those to be honest. I think I referred to him as the pedophile or a pedophile, but I mean I would say max three. Q. Have you left her voice mail messages about Professor Dershowitz? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 122 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 122 A. I have called her. Well, first she answered and then I said, please tell me it's not true that you're actually doing this and then she hung up and, yes, I have called her back and I have left her voice mails, nothing abusive just, Becky, what are you doing you know. Q. You know what? A. What are you doing, you know, like that's what I said to her. That's how I talk, our lingo. Not you know what, like anything, but what are you doing, you know. Q. Did you give her any context or is that the entire message that you would have left? A. I don't know the entire message I would have left, but like I said, it would not be abusive. Q. Now, I think that you mentioned in, was it Palm Beach, Juan Alessi? A. Yes. Q. He was on the house staff? A. Yes, he was a butler. Q. What was the name of the fellow? A. Joe Joe. Q. What's Joe Joe's last name? A. I have no idea. Q. Have you ever met Alfredo Rodriguez? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 123 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 123 A. I don't know. I mean, you have to understand there's lots of house staff at all of his residences. It's possible I did come across them, but I'm not too sure. Q. But you don't have any specific recollection ever meeting him, do you? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. No. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. You answered. Go ahead. THE WITNESS: Sorry. SPECIAL MASTER: It's all right. BY MS. BORJA: Q. What did you do with the your e-mails with Ms. Churcher? A. What do you mean, what did I do with them? Did I print them out? Q. Did you keep them in your inbox, your sent box? A. Yes, they would be in my in box. I mean, after so long, I mean, I had to not just delete hers, but delete a lot of files from my inbox, it was getting too full. I still have e-mails of hers in my inbox. Q. Do you still have the text messages you sent to Rebecca? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 124 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 124 A. No, I've gone through phones and that's not because of on purpose. My kids literally break every phone that I get. Q. So when was the last time that you texted Rebecca? A. When I found out that she was talking to Dershowitz. Q. What's that time frame? A. I have no idea. I think it was June of last year, June 2015, but that's not what I messaged her. I only messaged her recently when I found out, which I think was during Dershowitz' first deposition when he said that he had been talking about Rebecca. Q. And then you've switched phones since then? A. Yes, I have a new phone, but I have those messages that I sent to her on my new phone. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 6, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Giuffre, I've handed you a document that's been marked VR Exhibit 6, which is a 13 page document copy of an article from Radar Online. Do you have that? A. Yes, I do. Q. Is this the Radar Online article that you Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 125 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 125 referred to earlier in your testimony today with the ripped out pages from your booklet? A. Yes. Q. Do you have any understanding of how Radar Online got these pages? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. No, not at all. Q. After these were public on Radar Online did you contact that publication? A. No. Maybe I should have, but I didn't think of it. Q. Are the excerpts here things that you wrote in your handwriting? A. Yes. Q. These are the pages that you gave Ms. Churcher, correct? A. Uh-huh, yes. Q. Are there any pages that you gave Ms. Churcher that are not reflected in the article? A. I mean, can you give me a minute to look at all of them? Q. You don't have to read the comments. I'm not going to ask you about them. A. It looks like there's a little bit of excerpts taken out of the pages I gave to her. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 126 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 126 Q. Were there any additional pages that you gave to her that's not printed into this article? A. Yes, that's what I'm saying. I mean, from what I can tell it's like they've taken excerpts out of the pages I gave to her and kind of pieced them together; but if you read them closely it doesn't look like every single one matches the next. Q. What was your purpose in writing those pages? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. A. You know, at that time I was very let down by the United States government for not prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein in what I think that he deserved and what all his victims deserved to get from what he's done to us. So to me this was my way of telling a small piece of my story to see, you know, what we could do to re-open the case to get more knowledge about Jeffrey Epstein and what he's made, not just me, but a lot of other victims have to go through. Q. About how much time had elapsed between the time when you met Prince Andrew and the time that you wrote the booklet? A. Oh, many years, many years. All three of my kids had been born by then so we're talking, sorry, I am horrible at math, roughly about ten years. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 127 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 127 Q. In terms of your meeting with Prince Andrew when you went to Club Tramp, the excerpts in here said the two of you had grabbed a couple of alcoholic cocktails. Do you see that? A. Is that in the first page? Q. This is at page 3 of 13. The beginning of the text gets blocked out by the advertisement, but it refers generally to Club Tramp where you had grabbed them both an alcoholic cocktail, she wrote in the diary obtained by Radar? A. I do read that. Q. How long were you at the bar with Prince Andrew or at Club Tramp I should say? A. I would say over an hour but not two. Q. Did you have more than one drink? A. I believe I had two drinks. I'm not too sure if -- I assumed that Andrew was drinking alcohol as well, but I'm not too sure if it was. He ordered the drinks, and he ordered alcohol for me. So I only assumed that he was drinking it as well, but yes. Q. So he went up to the bar and ordered them and brought them back? A. Yes. Q. And you can't say what he ordered at the bar? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 128 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 128 A. I know they were both clear drinks. I don't know exactly what mine was, but it was clear and was alcohol. I didn't have a sip of his so I don't know what it was. Q. Did you take Ecstasy at this club? A. No. Q. And on two drinks -- did Prince Andrew have more than two drinks? A. I know I had two drinks. I don't know how many he had. I'm not too sure. Q. Okay. After these were public did you ever ask for these pages back? A. As far as I knew they were properties of Sharons. I think I had a rough conversation with her about it because I didn't know that these were going to get public at any time. These were more from between me and her. It really shocked me to see these in the public. So I honestly didn't think there was anything that you could do about it, it was already out there. Thinking about it today, you're right, I should have gone to Radar Online and found out why and who and how. Q. I don't mean to mislead you, Sharon's name is at the end of the article? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 129 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 129 A. Well, then -- I mean, that's obvious without even reading that. I mean, she's the only one who had it. So she's the only one who could have given it to them. Q. Why did you think it was her property? A. Because everything that I had given her was her property. Q. Why is that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. A. I mean, well -- SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: It's fine, if you know. Say what you know. A. Because everything that -- she told me everything that I gave her. So the story was her property, the papers that I gave her were her property. The photographs that they took of me like on the beach and I think there was a pictures of me on the bridge. Maybe there's a couple of other pictures, those are her property as well. Q. Was that spelled out in the contract? A. I don't know. It probably was. It was a long contract. I didn't have lawyers read it over for me so I'm not too sure. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 130 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 130 Q. Did you keep a copy of that? A. No. Q. What did you do with it? A. When I moved from Australia I had a bunch of paperwork I just kind of threw out, I didn't bring everything with me. Q. Why did you choose to move back to the United States at that time? A. I mean, there's a couple good reasons why I moved back. You know, first and foremost I haven't seen my family in a long time; and secondly, I wanted to see something happen with the -- I was trying to join the CVRA case so I was hoping by moving back I would see that progress. Q. What's the date that you moved back? A. As far as the picture that you just showed me of the house that's November. I think it only took me about two weeks -- actually I can tell you the exact date, it was on my anniversary, October 16th, 2013. MS. MCCAWLEY: Do you need a break or are you okay? THE WITNESS: I'm okay. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Other than the meeting that you talked about with the FBI in 2011 shortly after the first Daily Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 131 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 131 Mail article came out, have you talked to any other law enforcement about Jeffrey Epstein? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to the extent that it's an investigational privilege. If there's an ongoing investigation to extent it was the FBI or something that happened previously you can discuss that. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Okay. Honestly I'm trying to think, FBI -- I'm trying to remember when I talked to Maria Vilafana. I'm just going to say I'm not to sure. I don't want to answer incorrectly. Q. Have you ever given an affidavit to law enforcement? A. An affidavit? Q. Something that you signed? A. Yes, I know what it is. I'm just trying to think. I'm not questioning you, but would the FBI have an affidavit? I don't know. I would have signed something for them. MS. MCCAWLEY: Just answer what you know. BY MS. BORJA: Q. When was the first time that you told Brad Edwards that you had been sexually abused by Professor Dershowitz? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 132 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 132 MS. MCCAWLEY: And again, no attorney/client privileged discussions, you can give the date. A. I don't know the date. MS. MCCAWLEY: Or time frame. A. It would have been, I think, on -- this is not attorney/client privilege? SPECIAL MASTER: Just the time frame. MS. MCCAWLEY: As long as you don't describe it. Just the time frame. SPECIAL MASTER: You can't describe the conversation but you can describe the time frame. A. That's a difficult answer because there -- MS. MCCAWLEY: I don't want you to go into considerations. Think about it in your mind. So don't talk about what you were discussing, but if you can come up with a date in your mind or a time period then you can say that. A. Let's just say the first time I mentioned Alan Dershowitz I think was in 2011. Q. Did you say -- when was the first time, not that you mentioned Alan Dershowitz but that you identified him as a sexual abuser? A. The first time I went into detail about it would have been I think in 2013, maybe early 2014. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 133 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 133 Q. Were you living in the U.S.? A. Yes. Don't quote me 100 percent, it could have been before then. I'm just trying to remember back. Q. When was the first time, just the date, that you ever told Paul Cassell that you were sexually abused by Alan Dershowitz? SPECIAL MASTER: Just the date. A. It would have early 2013, 2014, same as Brad. Q. Now, in the document that we previously marked, the transcript of your conversation with Mr. Scarola, I'm not going to ask you to read it, I'm just asking you generally, you had said that Brad Edwards had contacted you because he was being sued -- he was in a lawsuit with Mr. Epstein. Do you recall that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. Sorry. THE WITNESS: You're confusing me. MS. MCCAWLEY: It's part of it. I'm sorry. A. Yes, I do remember that. Q. Do you know when that was? A. Possibly April 7, 2011. I don't know if that's the same conversation or it was before that or after that, but I believe the first time me and Brad ever talked was around that date. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 134 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 134 Q. He called you, right? You didn't call him out of the blue, he called you out of the blue? A. No, I might have called him, I think. I might have. I can't honestly remember, but Sharon Churcher knew how much I wanted to see this case open up and get resolved which is why I talked to the FBI. So I can't remember if she introduced me to Brad. I think that's how that went. Q. Did Sharon Churcher know about Mr. Edwards' litigation with Mr. Epstein? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer if you know. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer. A. I don't know what she knew about him, but she told me he was a really good lawyer who was doing pro bono work for other victims of Epstein and that if I wanted talk to somebody, he would be a good person to talk to. Q. That was in the -- A. Same time period. Q. 2011? A. Yes. Q. Okay. So in 2011 he was going to help you? A. At that stage we hadn't established Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 135 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 135 anything. It was just kind of like, hi, who are you, this is me, who are you, so on so forth. Q. You wanted to identify yourself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein? A. Absolutely. MS. MCCAWLEY: Do you need a break? THE WITNESS: No. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Now, in your -- that transcript towards the end Mr. Scarola asks you certain names? SPECIAL MASTER: What page are you referring to? BY MS. BORJA: Q. At page 22 of 23? A. Yes. Q. If you go down about halfway, two-thirds of the way down the page, it says -- so I'll just name a name and you tell me yes if they told the truth. I think they have relevant information, or no, I don't think they would or I don't know whether they would or not. Okay, you understand? MS. MCCAWLEY: I don't see where you are. MR. SCAROLA: Just below the middle of the page. MS. MCCAWLEY: Here we go. I see it, I'm Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 136 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 136 sorry. BY MS. BORJA: Q. You see where I am reading? A. Uh-huh. Q. And then you say yes, and then Mr. Scarola says, okay, Les Wexner, do you see that? A. Yes. Q. And you said I think he has relevant information, but I don't think he'll tell you the truth. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Why did you think he wouldn't tell the truth? A. Because he did things that were wrong. Q. What do you mean by that? A. He participated in sex with minors. Q. Did you tell Rebecca that Les Wexner had participated in sex with minors? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you talk to Rebecca about efforts to obtain any sort of the remedy or relief or damages or other way to bring Mr. Wexner to justice? A. I did talk to her about the ongoing proceedings that I wanted to bring against Mr. Wexner. Q. What did you tell her? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 137 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 137 A. I told her the details about what happened between Wexner and I and, you know, I said I hope we can get him in some way. I mean, I've heard the statements about the 50 billion or whatever that was, completely incorrect and I honestly do not know where she pulled that rabbit out of, that's absorb. I don't know her to be an untruthful person, but what her statements were are a thousand percentage untrue. MS. BORJA: Can you read back the answer? I can read your notes. BY MS. BORJA: Q. When you said I hope we can get him in some way, what did you mean by that? A. I hoped that my lawyers would prevail in fighting him in court, you know. I don't know what I'm allowed to talk about. MS. MCCAWLEY: You're not allowed to discuss anything that we've talked about in a confidential nature. A. There was never any monetary value ever discussed. Q. So you wanted to go off Wexner? SPECIAL MASTER: Outside of -- MS. MCCAWLEY: If you're talking about the conversation with Rebecca. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 138 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 138 SPECIAL MASTER: You're excluding discussions with your lawyers. MS. MCCAWLEY: If you're talking about the conversations with Rebecca that time but don't talk about anything you talked to us about. A. No, with Rebecca there was no monetary value ever discussed. Q. But you said you wanted to go after him in court? A. Yes. Q. What did you want to have happen? A. I wanted to see him come forward. I wanted justice to happen. Q. What does that mean? A. I wanted him to own up for his wrongs. Q. Did you go to the government and say prosecute him? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. To the extent that it reveals any current ongoing investigation you can't discuss that. SPECIAL MASTER: Anything that you had discussions with your lawyers and they provided on your behalf, that's not to be discussed. Do you understand that. A. Did I tell Rebecca that I'm going to the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 139 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 139 government? SPECIAL MASTER: We're talking about Rebecca. A. No, I never went to Rebecca and told her we're going to the government. What did the government have to do with this anyways? Q. Did you want to have Mr. Wexner or anybody else pay amounts to your charity? A. No. Q. Why not? You didn't want any money for your charity? A. Of course I want money for my charity. I'd love to see -- my charity is my vision, to be able to help other victims out there suffering through what I suffered through. Of course that would be a dream come true, but did I say that money is going to be put into that by some unimaginable source, no. Q. Has the charity distributed any funds to victims? A. Not as yet. We haven't been able to go out and publish, not publish, what's the word I'm looking for? We haven't been able to make it proactive the way I want to make it proactive like go on TV and talk about it. You know what I mean? It's there, it's set up, it's wonderful. It's got a list of numbers and names of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 140 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 140 places you can to go to for help. Right now it's just a map of every place in the United States that I've called personally to be able to get out of the situation that you're in if you're a victim of abuse or sexually trafficked. There's no money to give to victims. Q. There's no funds currently in the charity? A. No, besides what keeps it afloat in the bank, which is probably $150 or something. Q. Are the officers paid? A. The who? Q. The officers of the charity? A. No, no one is paid. Q. Has anybody applied to the charity or funds? A. No, like has a victim called up and said, can we get some money? Is that what you're asking? No. Q. That's one way? A. No. Q. Nobody has contacted the charity on line? A. No, we have had nice people call up and tell us about their story and, you know, thank me for coming forward and being brave. We have had that, but we have had nobody ask for money, we've just had nice fan mail. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 141 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 141 SPECIAL MASTER: Now is good time to take a five-minute break. MS. MCCAWLEY: Sure, I was going to let you know, too, in the effort to conserve time I did get lunch brought in for everybody. I'm not sure how many things are open since this is a Saturday. I don't know when you're hungry. It's your deposition, unless you're ready to eat, but whenever that is, I think she set it up maybe in one of the rooms so we can sign them out. SPECIAL MASTER: Thank you. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off -- SPECIAL MASTER: The witness is excused. Go ahead and step out. MS. MCCAWLEY: Meridith, why don't you take her. (Witness leaves the conference room.) SPECIAL MASTER: Housekeeping. You wanted to put your objection on the record outside of the witness. Go ahead. Now would be the appropriate time. MS. BORJA: The witness has testified that she's afraid for her life. Her counsel has instructed her not to provide names because of fears of physical retribution. At the same time Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 142 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 142 the witness has posted on Facebook in a way that's publically available not only the photo of her house, the exact street address. She posted her children up on Facebook. I didn't inject those children into this case, I don't plan to, but there's no basis when a witness has made a Facebook page profile available to the world to say that I'm supposed to collect copies of something that's on the Internet and seal them. That's not my obligation and I think that is inappropriate, and this is something that the witness has put out there that is inconsistent with the testimony. MS. MCCAWLEY: I want to make clear, the date on that is November of 2013. She has received threats to her safety since that date. So it is inappropriate to put her address on the record or anything with respect to her children. MS. BORJA: I did not read her address into the record. MR. SCAROLA: May I make a suggestion? I understand the point that is attempted to be made with regard to the relevancy of these matters, and the relevancy is the suggestion that posting pictures of her children and her address would Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 143 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 143 tend to contradict assertions that she is in fear. Well, to the extent that that is a relevant argument it is established by reference to the fact that pictures of her children and her address were posted on the Internet in a specific date, there's no reason for either the pictures themselves or the address to be part of any record. So we would join in the objection that as a matter of privacy those things be excluded from the public record, although referenced to the fact of the posting is fair game from our perspective. MS. BORJA: Then I'm going to go in, I'm going to need to re-examine the witness because I avoided any mention of her children based on her counsel's objections, and I will ask her on the record that she has posted pictures of her own children. I didn't ask her that. MR. SCAROLA: We'll stipulate to the fact I think that she said those are her children. We'll stipulate to the fact that there are photographs of her children. MS. BORJA: That she posted. MR. SCAROLA: That she posted. MS. MCCAWLEY: On that date. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 144 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 144 MR. SCAROLA: On that date in 2013 and that her address appears on the document posted in 2013. SPECIAL MASTER: Does that stipulation satisfy you? MR. SCOTT: We'll consider it over lunch. We'll talk. MR. SCAROLA: Over lunch. When we take the break we'll talk to the client. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm not excluding the documents, should be aware. What I want to do, though, is take extra precaution to protect the document from being disclosed in any form, which is why we've collected all of the copies. I will put you in charge of them, Sigrid, and what we'll do -- and with respect to your relevancy argument or any other argument that you wish to make on that it appears it's going to go in front of Judge Lynch. That document is going to be available to you. If he's going to treat it in the manner in which he treats it and gives it whatever weight. I'm not excluding that, but what I do want to do is take the extra precaution of protecting the witnesses' privacy. MS. BORJA: That's fine, but to be clear my Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 145 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 145 objection is not relevance. My basis for arguing this is not relevancy. It goes to the credibility of the witness. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm aware. I will share this, if you need to ask additional questions beyond the stipulation, then I think we can go down that road and let you ask the questions and we'll see if there's an objection with respect to those, but I'm going to give you that opportunity if you choose to take it. Fair enough? MS. BORJA: Yes. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's break for five minutes. Let's be back here, it is, by my watch it is now what, 20 to 1. Let's be back here at quarter to one. MS. MCCAWLEY: Can we have a time check on how much time we've spent? THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Two hours and 59 minutes exactly. SPECIAL MASTER: It's 20 to 1. Let's be back ready to begin the deposition again at 1:00 o'clock. (Lunch recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video record, 1:16 p.m. disk number 3. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 146 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 146 BY MS. BORJA: Q. Mr. Giuffre, we were talking earlier today about that joinder motion and I had given you a copy of this document, do you still have to in front of you, Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 corrected motion? A. This one? MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes. A. Yes. Q. Turn, please, to page 4 of that document. MS. MCCAWLEY: Hang on one second. I don't think I have a copy here of this for some reason. I know you gave me one. I got it. I'm sorry. Thank you. BY MS. BORJA: Q. In the first full paragraph if you go six lines down. Let's start five lines down where it says, the sentence begins, in addition to. Do you see where I'm reading? A. Yes. Q. In addition to being a participate in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors Dershowitz was an eye witness to the sexual abuse of many other minors by Epstein and several of Epstein's co-conspirators. Do you see that? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 147 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 147 Q. Now, where it says participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3, you talked about your abuse and other minors? A. I'm sorry, I don't see -- yes, participant, yes. Q. Participant in the abuse of other minors? A. Yes. Q. Can you identify any of those minors? A. Specifically talking right now I'm speaking about the girl on the airplane and in the limousine. Q. How do you know the age of the girl on the airplane? A. Like I said before they looked young but it's hard to depict exactly what age they are. Q. It's possible that neither one of them was a minor? A. It's possible that they were, yes, not a minor, but from what they looked like to me they did look young. Like I said, I can't tell you their ages because I didn't talk to them and ask them their ages. Q. Then it says Dershowitz was an eye witness to the sexual abuse of many other minors of Epstein and several of Epstein's co-conspirators, do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Is that something that you personally know? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 148 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 148 A. Yes. Dershowitz was around a lot and Epstein constantly had minors around with him. So to say that he personally knew about the abuse happening with the other minors, I mean, even before Dershowitz and I were personally together, he walked in on -- one occasion in New York he walked in on me providing oral sex to Jeffrey Epstein and, I mean, I thought that was a very awkward situation, somebody just knocking on the door walking in continuing to have a conversation while he's being serviced. So and then as well, you know, there's -- I mean, charades of, tons of young girls constantly around for the only sole purpose of having sex with those minors. Q. How many times would anybody have to visit an Epstein property to be an eye witness to the sexual abuse of many of the minors in your opinion? A. I'm sorry, can you rephrase? I just don't understand what you mean. Q. You say that Dershowitz was on eye witness? A. Yes. Q. But you never actually saw him as an eye witness to the sexual abuse of many of the minors; is that correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. Yes, I did see him as an eye witness Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 149 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 149 obviously on the plane and in the limousine. Q. But we don't know those were minors one way or the other, right? A. Right. Q. That's your assumption, correct? A. Yes. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Q. And you're speculating, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: Sorry. A. Yes. I mean I -- MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me, I don't believe the witness finished her response. You interrupted her as she was still speaking. BY MS. BORJA: Q. So let's leave those two instances aside? MR. SCAROLA: May we ask her to please to finish her response. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can finish your answer if you had anything else to say. SPECIAL MASTER: I thought you had finished. Do you have anything else to add? A. They were young girls and there was constantly young girls that I know were minors around, I Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 150 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 150 mean, only because they were too, way too young to even look like an 18 year old plus. Q. Okay. I'm not asking about other girls being around. I'm asking about Professor Dershowitz being an eye witness to sexual abuse with other minors. I'm asking you from the basis of your testimony that you know that he saw sexual abuse of other minors. What's the basis for your testimony? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. The only thing I can say to that is that there were minors around and did Dershowitz know that Jeffrey Epstein was using these minors for sexual purposes, yes, he did. Q. How do you know that? A. How do I know that Dershowitz knew that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Yes, how do you know what he knew? A. How do I know what he knew, because he was around Jeffrey Epstein so many times that you would have to be blind to not know what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. Q. So it's your guess as to what Professor Dershowitz knew or didn't know, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, argumentative. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 151 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 151 A. No, it's a fact. Q. Did you see Professor Dershowitz as a witness to the sexual abuse of anybody you know to have been a minor? Did you personally witness that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. With any other -- I'm sorry, with any other minors? Did I see him with any other minors, is that what you're asking me? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Besides the two girls that I considered to be very young, but I don't know their ages, no, I have not seem him personally witness sexual abuse in that circumstance. Just the sheer fact that the girls were around and he knew the purpose for the girls being around. Q. What's the basis for your testimony that he knew the purpose for the girls being around? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Because Jeffrey used these girls -- he didn't have friends that were 15, 16, 17, 18 just to hang around with as friends. And like I said, you would have to be a blind person to not know what he was doing with Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 152 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 152 these girls. I mean, he was arranging massages for other people that I did not witness myself, for these girls, and they were minors. So for Dershowitz to be around on so many occasions and know that there's minors around, I mean, it's just common logical sense. Q. So you're making an assumption, right? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. You can call it an assumption, but like I said you'd have to be blind to not know what's going on. Q. How many times did somebody to have to come to an Epstein property for you to have the same assumption about that person? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I would say the first time they came to that property there is nude pictures everywhere. These are salacious acts of girls, young girls doing things to each other that would be considered child pornography. If you walked foot into Jeffrey Epstein's house and you went in there and you continued to be an acquaintance of his then you would have to know what was going on there. Q. So Donald Trump was in your mind you believe a witness to the sexual abuse of minors? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 153 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 153 MS. MCCAWLEY: Let her finish. Objection. That mischaracterizes testimony. THE WITNESS: Thank you. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer. A. I don't think Donald Trump participated in anything. That would have to be another assumption. I never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Jeffrey Epstein. I've heard he has been, but I haven't seen him myself so I don't know. Q. You've seen Heidi Klum with Jeffrey Epstein, correct? A. At parties. MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. So is it your assumption that she's a witness to sexual abuse of minors? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. I don't know if Heidi Klum was at the house of Jeffrey Epstein. I know she was at parties with Jeffrey Epstein. So, no, I can't say she's a witness. Q. Is Bill Clinton a witness to the sexual abuse of minors? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 154 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 154 MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. You can answer. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: Just what you know. A. Yes, he would be a witness because he knew what my purpose there was for Jeffrey and he visited Jeffrey's island. MS. MCCAWLEY: Shhh please. Let her finish her answer. A. There's pictures of nude girls all around the house at all of his houses and it's something that Jeffrey Epstein wasn't shy about admitting to people. Q. Is Tipper Gore a witness to the sexual abuse of minors? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. Not that I'm aware of. I mean, if you're going to say why was I there with an older man, then I guess yes, she would be, but do I believe that she took presence in anything like that, absolutely not. I can't say. I'm not on grounds to say that. Q. Some people you'll assume and some people you won't? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. Some people I would say are closer to Jeffrey than others. Did I see Tipper hang around Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 155 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 155 Jeffrey as much as Alan Dershowitz, no, I didn't. But Alan Dershowitz was around all the time so I would definitely say he was a witness to it. Q. Is Larry Summers a witness to the abuse of those minors? A. You'd have to tell me who Larry Summers is. Q. Is Al Gore a witness to the sexual abuse of minors? A. Again, he wasn't around all the time. I only met him once so I can't say that he is. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 7, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Giuffre, you have what's been marked as VR Exhibit 7 in front of you? A. Yes. Q. This is the Daily Mail article titled teenage girl recruited by pedophile, and it goes on. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Can you turn to page 3 of 31 of this printout. Do you have that? A. Yes. I do. Q. Right above the photograph there it says, Virginia disclosed that Mr. Clinton's Vice-President, Al Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 156 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 156 Gore and his wife Tipper were also guests of Epstein on the island. Do you see that? A. Yes, I do. Q. Is that true statement in the article? A. It is a true statement that I did meet Al Gore and his wife, but I cannot 100 percent lock down that it was at the island, it could have been New York. Q. Did you tell Ms. Churcher that it was on the island? A. I did tell Ms. Churcher that I thought it was on the island and this is how it was printed out. Q. Is Kevin Spacey a witness to the sexual abuse of minors? A. I don't know Kevin Spacey so I can't say that he is or isn't. Q. Do you know who he is? A. I know who he is. Q. Do you know how often, if ever, he was at any Epstein property? A. I was never there as an eye witness to see that. Q. Now, you refer to nude pictures a second ago. Do you recall that? A. Yes. Q. Where in the -- start with the Little Saint Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 157 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 157 James island, where in that property were there nude pictures? A. So there was nude pictures in -- I don't know how to explain it, you've got a main house, I don't know, have you seen pictures of the island? Q. You can just describe it as best you can? A. Well, in the main house not attached to Jeffrey's room there's a, I don't know if you want to call it an entertaining room, it looks like a living room but it's bigger than that. It has TV, couches and everything like that in there. There is nude photographs all over that room. There is nude photographs in -- adjacent to the right-hand side is Ghislaine Maxwell's office, there's nude photographs in there. Away from the main house in Jeffrey Epstein's private bedroom there are nude photographs in there. Q. In these locations where there's nude photographs is that where Epstein guests go typically? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Are you referring this one house or all the houses? BY MS. BORJA: Q. That's what we're talking about? A. The main house? MS. MCCAWLEY: Right. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 158 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 158 A. Right outside the main house is the main dining table. So in order for you to get to the dining table, I mean, you could walk from outside, but considering if you're coming from inside to outside, yes, you would have to cross those. Q. So did guests of Jeffrey Epstein typically see those nude photographs to the best of your understanding? A. To the best of my understanding, yes. Q. Where were there nude photographs in the Palm Beach house? A. As soon as you walked into the front door there was a large hallway table and I would assume, my assumption is there is at least 50 photographs on that table, some with nude photographs, some with girls in raunchy, forgive me when I say raunchy, I mean lingerie photos mixed in with Jeffrey and some of the privileged people he's met, such as, you know, I don't know, like old girlfriends or models or Naomi Campbell or whatever the case is; but among all of those photographs would be nude photographs. Q. And this is, when you say, was it the front room or front table? A. Like as soon as you walked through the front door of the mansion the first thing that you see is Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 159 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 159 is that hallway table, on that hallway table is there. Q. And that front door that you were referring to is the one that guests walk in? A. Yes, and also upstairs in Jeffrey's massage room there is a hidden room where nude photographs from the floor to the ceiling all over, right, so there's not one piece of white showing. Q. Let me ask you about that? A. And then there's boxes and boxes and boxes of nude photographs. Q. You say this is a hidden room, what do you mean by that? A. It's not a room that you could just walk in and see. It's something that Jeffrey would show you. So in the massage room you've got the shower, the steam shower, the message table in the middle, and to your, I'm bad at left and right, if I was facing this way it would be my left. It's like a closet, top to bottom with nude photographs. Q. Is this a place where guests typically when? A. If you were having a massage, yes. Q. Did all guests get massages in this hidden room? A. I can't say that all guests did. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 160 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 160 Q. Is that where Professor Dershowitz' massage was? A. Yes. Q. Where were there nude photographs in New York? A. In New York, so you would have to go upstairs, make a left into Jeffrey's office, all over the table, sorry, can I go back to Palm Beach. I forget another place. MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, you're allowed to finish your answer. A. Back to Palm Beach there was -- so you walk into the front door and I told you about that table and again, I'm bad at left and right, but if I'm facing the door this way you make a right and there's Jeffrey's desk and then Ghislaine's desk and all over their desks were nude photographs, all over the computer, like, you know the screen pages that you get pop up, nude photographs on that as well. So I just wanted to mention those, and outside the cabana, sounds horrible, outside by the cabana by the pool there's more nude photographs. Q. And these are all locations where guests would be? A. Yes. Q. And it was frequent that guests would have Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 161 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 161 the opportunity to see these as they were going through the house? A. Yes, if you walked through Jeffrey's house there is not a chance that you could not see nude photographs. Q. Were the photographs ever changed or taken down when guests were there? A. No. Like I said, he was not ashamed. Q. Were there also nude photographs in New Mexico? A. Yes, but more in his, like I guess you would call it an office. It's not like Florida where you just walk in and you see it right there, it was more you'd have to go to his office to see them. I'm just trying to recollect. There was some by his bedside table, and I honestly think that's all I can remember seeing them around the New Mexico house. Q. Did guests go by Jeffrey's bedside table? A. Sometimes if there was -- something was happening. Q. If you were just a visitor for a dinner party for example? A. No, if you were there for a dinner party you wouldn't go into his bedroom. Q. If you were just a guest for a dinner party Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 162 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 162 in New Mexico would you see nude photographs in getting to the dining room? A. No. I don't think we finished New York, did we? Q. You tell me? A. I don't think we did. I think I skipped from telling you about New York and went back to Palm Beach. So should I touch back to New York? MS. MCCAWLEY: Finish your answer. Yes. A. New York. So there was pictures on his desk in the office and around that room, and then there's this room that I refer to as the dungeon and that had a huge photograph of me and another girl, I mean huge as in bigger than that wall cabinet. There's a painting of both of us doing salacious acts together. Q. Salacious acts? A. Sexual acts, you know what I'm saying? MR. SCAROLA: Could I request that the camera pan to above Virginia so as to show the wall cabinet and then come back down if you would, please? Thank you. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Now, the Dubins, they visited Jeffrey Epstein's property, correct? A. Yes. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 163 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 163 MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. ? A. Yes, . Q. And the children would see these nude photographs in the property? A. Yes. Q. And both the parents would? A. Yes. Q. Were there other children that saw these nude photographs? A. I mean, if you're talking about minors, then yes. Q. When you saw Alan Dershowitz visiting Jeffrey Epstein's properties did you ever see his wife ? A. No. Q. Did you ever see his grandchildren? A. No. Q. Do you know whether they were there or not? A. I don't know if they were there, but I did not see them. Q. Now is somebody who was at Jeffrey Epstein's properties, correct, at least at one, - Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 164 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 164 right? A. Yes. Q. Which property was that? MS. MCCAWLEY: It's previously -- she's a childhood victim. We're objecting to a line of testimony regarding details about sexual encounters with . If you know if she was in a location you can state that, but you don't have to give details. SPECIAL MASTER: She's asking only the location at this point. A. I'm just looking out for her. She was a victim. Yes, she was at all of his residences. Q. Did her mother ever come to visit any of these residences? A. I never met her mother. Q. Do you know whether her mother did? A. I don't know. Q. You never met A. No. Q. How much were you paid for messages? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to -- just give me a moment. This is one of the areas that Judge Lynch quashed discovery on. I know you've made a ruling on that, but I want to make my record. He Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 165 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 165 made a ruling that she did not have to go through a remuneration of funds as a result of the activities she was forced to participate in. That's the request. SPECIAL MASTER: Let me take a look at this. MS. MCCAWLEY: Sure. That was question 20 and he quashed that. MS. BORJA: Can you tell me which duces tecum request you're saying this is? MS. MCCAWLEY: I believe it's request 20. All documents showing any payments or remuneration of any kind made by Epstein or his agents or associates to you from June 1999 to December 31, 2002. BY MS. BORJA: Q. I'll ask another question. You've made statements that you were paid $200 a massage, correct? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Same objection. He did not make her produce documents or have any testimony regarding the payments she received. SPECIAL MASTER: Do you have a statement particularly you're referring to? BY MS. BORJA: Q. You were paid for sexual services by Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 166 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 166 Jeffrey Epstein, right? A. Yes. Q. Did you pay taxes on those? A. No. Q. Why not? A. It was cash payment. Q. You were a waitress at the Roadside Grill, right? A. Yes, for a very short time. Q. Did you pay taxes on that? A. Not that I know of. No, I don't think I've ever paid taxes in the U.S. Q. And you haven't paid taxes since you returned? A. I haven't worked here since I returned. Q. When you got the $160,000 for the media deal you didn't pay taxes on that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Go ahead. A. I did pay taxes on that in Australia. Q. But not in the U.S.? A. It was given to me in Australian money so I paid for it in Australian taxes. Q. When you worked at Mar-a-Lago did you pay taxes? A. No, I was only there a very short period of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 167 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 167 time. Max maybe pulled in two paychecks, so no. I think as a young age I think there's an exemption if you're 15 or something like that you don't have to pay tax. That's what I heard. I'm not too sure if that's correct or not, but no, I didn't pay tax on it. Q. What was the last grade that you completed in school? A. I believe it was the ninth grade. Q. Did you ever complete your GED? A. I attempted to complete my GED, but I never did. Q. And over what period of time did you receive payment for any sexual acts? MS. MCCAWLEY: Same objection that I had before. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. A. From 1999 to 2002. Q. Until when in 2002, until you left? A. Yeah, even after I left Jeffrey sent me money in Thailand Western Union just to help pay for my school that I was being sent to and just living expenses. Q. How long were you in Thailand? A. I believe I was there from September, I can't remember the exact date in September, but let's just say early September and then after I married my Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 168 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 168 husband we went on a honeymoon. I think I came to Australia, I think it was November. MS. BORJA: I don't want to take a lot of time, I don't know why I'm not putting my hands on this document right now. I'll just have it marked and give you the original. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 8, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. I'm going to read to you, I'll hand it to you in a second, read to you the document that is marked as VR Exhibit Number 8 and it says, at page 3 of 29, "Epstein, a Wall Street money manager who once counted Bill Clinton and Donald Trump amongst his friends, became the subject of an undercover investigation in 2005 after the stepmother of a 14-year old girl claims she was paid $200, 125 pounds sterling to give an erotic massage." Do you see that? A. What paragraph is that on? Q. Top of the page. A. However, he avoided trial. Yes. Yes, I do. MS. MCCAWLEY: So I'm objecting as to any testimony regarding payments to you if it's a payment to someone else. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 169 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 169 SPECIAL MASTER: Right now the only question pending is do you see that paragraph? BY MS. BORJA: Q. Was that a standard payment for massages by Jeffrey Epstein? MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer that. A. Yes, it is. Q. What's the basis for your testimony in that regard? A. It was the basis for my testimony? Q. How do you know that's a standard payment? A. That's -- are you trying to trick me into another question? MS. MCCAWLEY: I have an objection to this line of questioning, I mean I do. I have an objection based on a quash. If the article references a payment and you're familiar with that payment. MS. BORJA: Counsel, speaking objections are not appropriate. MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm making my objection for the record. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on. Finish making your objection. Try not to instruct the witness during the objection. Okay. You can answer the Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 170 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 170 question. A. So can you repeat that question for me? SPECIAL MASTER: Go ahead and repeat it off the record so we get the exact wording. (Last question read back by the court reporter.) A. Yes, I do. Q. What's the basis for that statement? A. That's what we were given. Q. Who is we? A. Any of the girls that had to service Jeffrey. I'll speak for myself alone. Q. That's per massage? A. Yes. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 9, was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Giuffre, I have handed you document a that's been marked as VR Exhibit 9, which is a declaration of Virginia Giuffre? A. Yes. Q. You've seen this document before? A. I've seen a lot of documents, but yes I have seen this. Q. On page 6, please. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 171 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 171 MS. MCCAWLEY: Is there a copy for me? MS. BORJA: Do you have one? MR. SCAROLA: No. Thank you. Page 6 is that where we are? BY MS. BORJA: Q. Yes, paragraph 20. You say here in your affidavit, Dershowitz was so comfortable with the sex that was going on that on one occasion he observed me in sexual activity with Epstein. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. And that's the same event that you testified earlier where you testified that Professor Dershowitz walked into Jeffrey Epstein's private bedroom? A. Yes. Q. And we talked about the six instances earlier today and I believe you've indicated that they were at six different locations, correct? A. At least, yes. Q. Are there any other instances that you recall? A. Not off the top of my head. Q. Think about it. I want your best testimony today before we leave? A. All I can remember right now at this time is these approximately six times. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 172 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 172 Q. Why didn't you mention the limousine in your affidavit? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. To the extent that this pertains to a conversation you had with your lawyers she can't reveal that, anything else you can reveal. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: If you can answer without talking about what you discussed with your lawyers. A. At that time I wasn't asked about it and it came to me while thinking about it later on. Q. When did it first come to you? A. I don't know the exact date or time. Like I said to you earlier it's, trust me, this is not stuff you want to remember, this is stuff you want to try to throw away in the back of the garbage can in your head, and it took me a long time to be able to do that and move on with my life. And when Jeffrey got away with everything that he had gotten away with it infuriated me so then I wanted to do something about it which is why I started thinking about the things more and more and more; and sometimes the more and more and more I thought about it, the more I would remember certain occasions. Q. But you didn't remember the limousine as of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 173 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 173 the time of this affidavit? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can answer. A. Apparently not. Q. Have you ever told anybody about having sex in the limousine with Alan Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Outside of your lawyers. A. Outside of my lawyers, no. Q. Did you ever tell your lawyers? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. I'm not going to have her testify as to what she told the lawyers. SPECIAL MASTER: We're not going to allow that. BY MS. BORJA: Q. It's your privilege, the attorney/client privilege. MS. MCCAWLEY: She's not waiving her privilege. MS. BORJA: Counsel, can I make my record? SPECIAL MASTER: You've said -- go ahead and make your record. BY MS. BORJA: Q. You hold the privilege, you're the decider. The attorney/client privilege belongs to you. If you Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 174 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 174 would like to waive it you have that opportunity to do it? A. I decide not to waive my privilege at this time. Thank you. MR. SCAROLA: She would really like to be able to give you the answer to that question. MS. BORJA: Counsel, I would appreciate -- MR. SCAROLA: All right. I couldn't resist. MS. BORJA: This is not a game, this is not a joke to the witness or to the attorneys who are here for the correct purposes. So please don't make this a joke today. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's move on. MR. SCAROLA: I absolutely agree with you. It is not a joke. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's move on. I understand. Let's move on. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did you ever tell anybody other than your lawyers ever about your allegation that you had sex in the limousine? A. I've spoken with my husband about the times and experiences that I had with Dershowitz. Q. Including the limousine? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 175 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 175 A. Including all of the times that I can remember that I've told him. I mean, he's my best friend so. Q. This affidavit was signed November 20th, 2015. So around this past Thanksgiving. So you first remembered it since Thanksgiving? A. Yes. Q. So, since Thanksgiving have you had conversations with anybody about the allegation? A. Other than my lawyers, no. I mean, the only other person that would know anything about this would be my husband, but I mean, it's only because recently we've just been dealing with a lot of this. Q. How long did that sexual activity in the limousine take place? A. Not long. Q. What happened? A. You want a description? Q. I would like to know what happened in that limousine that is the abuse that you're alleging happened? A. Jeffrey instigated it, the men pulled out their, the wording for this is just anatomy. They pulled out their anatomy, their genitals and we were told to perform oral sex on them. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 176 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 176 Q. There was no discussion between the gentlemen beforehand that you heard? A. You know, I don't know the exact terms that they used during that time, but Jeffrey insinuated it and Alan agreed to it, so yes. Q. The time on the plane where you allege that you and another female participated in sexual activity, was that at the same time? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. A. What, the girl and me and Jeffrey and Dershowitz, was that like all together? Q. Tell me what happened on the plane? A. It went from -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Just use the best terms you can. Take your time. A. Sorry, it wasn't from giving foot massages, which is a normal thing that we would do on the plane to Jeffrey again insinuating, you know, we should -- him and Alan, we should kind of do this. I don't know their exact wording so I'm not going to put words in their mouth. But it went from foot messages to oral sex to intercourse. Q. So who was involved, I mean, you were sexually involved with Professor Dershowitz, correct? A. Yes. It was kind of -- to be honest it Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 177 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 177 was -- MS. MCCAWLEY: Use a term that you can use. A. It was a little bit of mix and match, it sounds horrible. So at first I went down -- oh God, I can't believe I'm saying this. At first I gave oral sex to Epstein, and the other girl gave oral sex to Dershowitz, and then we swapped within, I would say seconds, like 60 seconds to a minute we were told, you know, they wanted us to get on top so we mounted them and we straddled them and we performed intercourse on a bed in the airplane. Q. The foot messages, who gave who foot messages? A. I believe I was giving Jeffrey a foot massage and the other young lady was giving Dershowitz a foot message? Q. Anything else happen during that flight? A. After the sexual experiences, which is what I had been trained to do anyway, which was not out of the ordinary, I went to the back of the plane, got washcloths and proceeded to clean Jeffrey and Dershowitz up with a warm washcloth. Q. During this activity were condoms used? A. No. Q. Were condoms ever used with Professor Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 178 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 178 Dershowitz? A. No, and they weren't used with any other people as well. Q. Were the other people that you were sexual trafficked to? A. No. Q. Did you ever ask to use a condom? A. No, I mean, Jeffrey had us tested quite regularly so we knew we were clean. Q. You've never had a sexually transmitted disease? A. No. Q. Where would you get tested? A. At a doctors. To be specific a gynecologist. Q. Who was your doctor? A. A gynecologist in Palm Beach. Q. Who is that? A. I have no idea. Q. Were you ever hospitalized during 1999 to 2002? A. Yes. Q. For what? MS. MCCAWLEY: I object to the extent that this gets into private medical discussions. I Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 179 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 179 don't think she has to do that in this deposition. SPECIAL MASTER: Please answer the question. A. To this day I'm actually confused about the whole situation. If you want me to get into detail about it. SPECIAL MASTER: Listen to her question. Her question was -- A. Yes, I was medically brought to a hospital. Q. For mental health or physical health? A. Physical. Q. It didn't have anything to do with a sexually transmitted disease; is that correct? A. No, it wasn't a sexually transmitted disease. Q. Do you know which hospital you were treated at? A. No, but I know it was in New York. Q. Were you admitted into the hospital to stay or was it you went to the emergency room and they let you out the same day? A. I was admitted to the emergency room and I think I stayed two days. It could be more, it could be less. I know they heavily sedated me. I'm not too sure. Q. Were you given any medication as a result Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 180 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 180 of -- A. Yes. Q. What were you given? A. I don't know. I mean, I'm a young kid, I didn't know the medications or the terminology or anything. I think it was some kind of antibiotic. Q. You weren't given some sort of pain reliever? A. Yes, I was given pain relief at the hospital. I think I left the hospital with the antibiotics. Q. Do you have a book agent? A. What's a book agent? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Somebody to help you negotiate a book or media contract? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. This is again one of the requests that Judge Lynch quashed relating to their inquiry and their subpoena as to communications with -- it's actually two of them. He quashed 9, communications with media; he quashed 17, communications relating to potential book deals, et cetera. It's absolutely relevant as to whether or Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 181 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 181 not Professor Cassell and Mr. Edwards were defamed by Professor Dershowitz is what this case is about. It's not about any media inquiries or any book deals or anything of that nature. SPECIAL MASTER: And your position? MS. BORJA: This is a discovery deposition. This may lead to discovery of admissible evidence, and I understand that this witness doesn't want to provide this information but we can pursue it from third parties, and blocking us in this way is inappropriate. I simply asked for the name of an agent. MS. MCCAWLEY: So they lost in front of Judge Lynch and now they're trying to win here, I mean, it's totally inappropriate. He ruled in our favor. I have a motion to quash, and she shouldn't have to be forced to testify as to those items. SPECIAL MASTER: And your question is whether she has a book agent? That's the question? MS. BORJA: Right. SPECIAL MASTER: I think you can answer that question. A. Well, I don't have a book deal, but I have Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 182 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 182 looked into getting a book agent. SPECIAL MASTER: Do you have a book agent is the question? A. Not at this time, no. I did at one time. Q. When did you have one? A. Book in 2012, maybe the end of 2011. Q. Who was that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Again, I object to all this testimony. We had a motion to quash on this. We won that motion to quash for the reasons we argued in court in front of Judge Lynch and the testimony is not appropriate. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer the question if you know the person's name. A. His name is Gerad? Q. Who does he work for? A. I don't know the name of his company. He was just a small time guy. He worked with rappers before. That's about all I know about him. I don't know if we even actually signed anything saying he was my agent. He said he was interested, he read the stuff by Sharon Churcher. I think he was going to represent me if a book ever came out or if a book deal ever happened and nothing ever happened, so he's not representing me. Q. Did you tell him about Professor Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 183 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 183 Dershowitz? A. No. Q. Why not? A. Because we didn't even talk in lengthy discussion about that. We mostly talked about -- if I were going to have -- I can't say that. I mean, it's mostly about the sickening discussions, I mean, sickening ordeal that Epstein got away with so many counts of maliciously hurting minors and got away with it. That's more my idea if I was going to ever write a book. Q. Do you have any agreement or understanding with Boise, Schiller regarding what would happen if you did receive any monetary amounts from Mr. Wexner? MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm going to object to this. This gets into the relationship that she has with our firm and that's attorney/client privilege. You don't have to respond to any of that. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to grant that motion. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did you receive a payment of 10 or $15,000 after you claim that you had sex with Prince Andrew? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, it gets into the remuneration of which has already been quashed in one of the questions. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 184 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 184 MR. SCAROLA: I also don't understand the scope of the question. From whom, for what, did she ever get 10 or $15,000 in the last years unrelated to this case? The objection is overbroad, vague, confusing. SPECIAL MASTER: Put a time frame on it counsel and then I'll see. Put a time frame. BY MS. BORJA: Q. 2011 were you paid 10 to $15,000 by or on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein for having sex with Prince Andrew? A. 2011. Q. I'm sorry 2001? A. Is that granted? SPECIAL MASTER: I didn't make a determination yet. MS. MCCAWLEY: Same objection. THE WITNESS: Sorry. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to allow the question. I'm going to overrule the objection. You can answer if you know. A. Yes, I did receive $15,000. I don't know what equivalent that is to pounds. I received it in American dollars. COURT REPORTER: Repeat that again. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 185 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 185 A. I did receive $15,000. I do not know the equivalent to what that is in pounds. Q. And you didn't pay taxes on that? A. No. Q. When did you first retain Paul Cassell as your counsel? MS. MCCAWLEY: You can give the date but can't get into discussions you had with Mr. Cassell. SPECIAL MASTER: That's the question. A. I don't know the exact date, I'm sorry. Q. What's your best estimate? A. Well, I started talking to Brad in the fall in 2011, but I never met them personally until 2013 I think. So I don't know when I officially became their client. Q. When do you consider that you became their client, was it when you first met them? A. Personally, like face to face? Q. I'm asking you that question? I'm not suggesting that's the answer. A. No, that's why I'm asking you. When I talked to them on the phone or met them face to face? Q. Do you consider when you met them face to face as being the first time that you engaged them or Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 186 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 186 some other time? A. I believe when we first met face to face is when I became their client, I think that's right. Q. When did you first meet Brad Edwards face to face? A. The same time I met Paul. I think it's 2013. Q. Whenever it was that's when you engaged him to be your lawyer in your mind? A. Well, in my mind. It could have been 2011 when we started talking. I don't officially know. I really just trying to answer you honestly if possible. Q. But your understanding is when you met them you wanted them to represent you? A. Oh yeah, I wanted them to represent me from 2011. I just wanted to be a part of the CVRA case. I wanted my story to be heard and I wanted to help other victims out there, so yes. MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to observe that I think there are about 15 minutes left on the four hour allocation and I would like some time for examination of the witness. SPECIAL MASTER: There's actually how much? THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Seven. MR. SCAROLA: Seven minutes left. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 187 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 187 MS. BORJA: You did not cross notice this so if counsel wants to give you time that would be up to counsel. MR. SCAROLA: I don't know that it's necessary for me to cross-notice the depo. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. We have seven minutes, let's spend it wisely. Counsel is not finished with her examination. So she is entitled to complete her examination before handing it off. MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm comfortable allowing her four hours and then if you have questions we can deal with that. (Thereupon, VR Defendant's Exhibit No. 10 was Marked for Identification.) BY MS. BORJA: Q. Ms. Giuffre, I've handed you a document that's been marked as VR 10 which is a Federal Bureau of Investigation document consisting of 12 pages. Do you have that? A. Yes, I do. Q. Have you seen that before today? A. Yes, I have. Q. When did you first see this? A. I'm not too sure if the FBI gave me a copy Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 188 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 188 of it. I think it's a possibility that they did, otherwise I would have seen it from my lawyers. Q. If the FBI gave you a copy of it what would you have done with it? A. Probably put it in a big file in the back of my closet. Q. Do you keep a big file in the back of your closet with your personal papers? A. You should see my filing system, it's quite horrible. Q. Do you have -- actually let's turn to page 10 of 12? MS. MCCAWLEY: Numbered at the top, the very corner. A. Okay. Q. It says Giuffre recalled meeting, and then it's redacted. Giuffre was using Xanax, heavily at the time. Her recollection was not clear. She remembered that there were many models on the island that did not speak English along with a modeling person who had an unknown accent. Do you see that? A. Yes. Q. Do you know what incident this is referring to. A. With all the blanks there, that's not a Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 189 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 189 unusual thing because there was lots of models there. Q. Do you remember telling the FBI that you couldn't remember an incident because you were using Xanax heavily at the time and your recollection was not clear? A. No, I remember telling them that I used Xanax so of course things are going to be foggy, but some things severely stick out, you just can't remember no matter how much Xanax or anything else you take. MR. SCAROLA: Could you read that last response back again, please? MS. BORJA: During you deposition you can read back. MR. SCAROLA: No, I would like -- I'm not sure that I heard it correctly. If I could hear it back now please? MS. BORJA: No, you can read it on cross examination. I'm moving on. SPECIAL MASTER: Hold on a second. Read it back so we can move on. MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. (Last answer was read back by the court reporter.) MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 190 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 190 BY MS. BORJA: Q. When we started today I asked you about the subpoena duces tecum that's been marked in this case do you have that? A. I don't know of the subpoena. MS. MCCAWLEY: It's going to be one of the exhibits here. SPECIAL MASTER: Are you talking about the actual notice? MS. BORJA: I'm asking about the actual notice. MS. MCCAWLEY: I don't think that was marked. I'm sorry, there is a schedule A attached to the notice you marked. If you flip this page on the notice. SPECIAL MASTER: VR 1, there's a schedule attached to VR 1. MS. MCCAWLEY: You can use mine. A. Which page would you like me to look at? Q. Let's start with schedule A, number 1. Have you seen this document before? A. No, other than maybe you showing it to me today. It's in my pile. It's not in my pile, is it? I don't know. I haven't seen it. Q. Did you collect documents to give to Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 191 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 191 Professor Dershowitz as a part of this action? A. Did I collect documents to give to Dershowitz? Q. Correct? A. Why would I do -- no. Q. Do you have -- did you ever check to see if you have any original photographs in your possession? A. Unfortunately, I don't have lots of photographs because I left a lot of things behind in America when I moved to Australia. Q. Ms. Roberts, my questions is -- A. No, I don't have any in my hand or possession. Q. Did you look for any? A. I've seen the photos that I have and no, I don't see any of Alan Dershowitz in there. Q. My question was, were you looking for any original photographs to produce to Professor Dershowitz in this case, did you look? A. No. MS. MCCAWLEY: Other than what your lawyers have done for you I think is what she's asking. You made a production in this case and I think she may have been asking you questions about that. SPECIAL MASTER: Counsel, she's asking a Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 192 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 192 specific question of the witness. A. I'm sorry, that's my fault, I didn't understand the question. But no, I was not looking for photographs for Dershowitz. Q. Do you have any notes of any sort pertaining to Professor Dershowitz? A. I've got lots of affidavits. I don't know what these things are called, documents. Yes, I do have lots of those. Q. Do you have any drafts of those before they're final and you sign them? A. No, I've got final -- I've got stuff like this, declarations signed on the back. Q. You get a declaration at some point, right? A. Yes. Q. And it's not signed, correct? A. I sign it and my lawyers print it out for me. Q. Do you make any changes? A. Not unless there needs to be changes, but my lawyers do a great job of recording everything that I say. Q. But you've never made revisions, correct? A. Not that I'm aware of. Q. Have you made any notes, personal notes on Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 193 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 193 scraps of paper or notepads, the booklet pertaining to -- other than the ones that you gave, the pages that you gave to Ms. Churcher? A. I didn't give anything to Ms. Churcher about Alan Dershowitz, but when I'm going through, you know, my affidavits and stuff like that, if I do get a memory that sticks out, yes, I will write it down, you know, and think about it, but I don't have, you know, notes per se that have Dershowitz written all over it, no. Q. But when you think of something you write it down to help you with your memory? A. Yes. Q. What do you do with those documents? A. I'm a visual person so generally I just write them down and then I forget about it. It's not like -- I don't hold on to everything basically if that's what you're asking me. Q. Does any of it go to the file in the back of the closet? A. No, these do though. These are always back there, but, no. Q. Did you ever look to see if you had any notes that related to any times that you met Professor Dershowitz? Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 194 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 194 A. Besides what's in these? Q. Did you ever look to see if you had any personal notes in your writing that pertain to Professor Dershowitz? A. Like from my old journal, the one that I burned? Q. From anywhere. Did you ever make an effort to look? A. Dershowitz could have been in my journal, he could have been. We're talking about an 85 page, if not more, you know, things that I had written to get my story out of my head and into pages; and yes, Dershowitz could have been in there, but that's up in the clouds now, bonfire. Q. That's what you call your journals, what you burned, right? A. Yes. Q. And you wrote that journal in order to collect your thoughts? A. To get everything out of here and on to paper. Q. Have you made any other notes, though, since then to help you when you think of things? A. Yes, sometimes like I said, sometimes when I read my affidavits and stuff like that, you know, and I Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 195 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 195 think of something else like a description of something that I forget about, you know what I mean, then yeah, I'll go back and I'll write it in the journal, you know, for instance, you know, what another girl would have looked like. Even though I can't identify her name or her age or anything like that, but I do remember like flashes of blonde, little things like that, but nothing -- I don't have any more journals. Q. But those notes, they help your memory? A. Sometimes. I'm a very visual person. Q. And they help you with your affidavits? A. No, they don't help me with my affidavits, my affidavits are already done, I just go back and it helps my memory. It helps me bring stuff out. Q. What do you do with those notes? A. Nothing, literally nothing. They're in a notebook that if I need to write it down. I have a dream notebook as well where I'll just write down my dreams and stuff. I do nothing, no one is seeing it. Q. You read it? You keep it? A. Yeah, I keep it. Q. Okay. Have you gone back and read that recently? A. No. Q. Okay. You continue to make entries into Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 196 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 196 it? A. Not so much about Dershowitz. It's mostly like feelings, dreams, you know, past things that I've gone through. Like I said, not so much pertaining to Dershowitz himself. Q. And that's separate from your dream book? A. No, it's all in one. Q. Is it a spiral bound notebook? A. Yes, it's just a cheap, like, actually it's in my kid's closet. Q. At this point in time are you angry with Mr. Epstein? A. Furious. Q. Are you angry with Professor Dershowitz? A. Absolutely. Q. Are you angry with famous politicians? A. I'm angry with anybody who has it in their mind that they can hurt and abuse a minor child and continue to lie about getting away with it and that what they've done is okay and they can continue to harass victims, yes, I'm furious. Q. Are you angry with Professor Dershowitz for his role in representing Jeffrey Epstein in the criminal action? A. Do I think he played a big part getting him Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 197 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 197 off, absolutely. So many other lawyers of his, I'm angry with them, too. Q. Do you know what role Professor Dershowitz played in the criminal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein? A. No, by the time all the plea bargains and everything had happened I was just a notified victim. I didn't know, you know, hey, ex's said this and now this is going to be done. I was already way past that point and, hey, sorry, this is what you got to deal with. Q. And you don't know personally what role he had in the non-prosecution agreements with Mr. Epstein, is that fair? A. That's fair. I know he played a part in it, I know he was one of his lawyers. Q. What part do you know he played in it? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, asked and answered. SPECIAL MASTER: You can answer. MR. SCAROLA: Except to the extent that the information is derived from attorney/client privileged communications. SPECIAL MASTER: Agreed. THE WITNESS: What does that mean? SPECIAL MASTER: Outside of what your lawyers discussed if you can answer that question. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 198 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 198 A. I knew he was his lawyer from what I've been told. Q. But you don't know anything specific regarding the non-prosecution agreements, correct? A. No. MS. MCCAWLEY: Can we have a time check. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Four hours and seven minutes. MS. MCCAWLEY: We're going to wrap this up. We've indulged -- SPECIAL MASTER: How much further do you have in this line? MS. BORJA: In this line? Nothing, but I do have a lot more questions. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm sure that you do. Okay. I think it's a good place for us to break because I think we've satisfied what I see as the Court's order, four minutes -- four hours and you've gone a little bit over, but that's actually the running time, correct? THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Yes. SPECIAL MASTER: Based upon the Court's order I think the deposition is concluded. MS. MCCAWLEY: We're going to allow it be -- because I didn't interfere with her four hours, Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 199 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 199 so I allowed that to happen. MR. SCOTT: We object to that. The Court's order said four hours. The Court's order provided for us to have the four hours and now all of a sudden by agreement of the plaintiff's attorney and the witnesses' lawyer without ever requesting it from the judge, we're now going to agree to extent the period? SPECIAL MASTER: Mr. Scarola? MR. SCAROLA: The Court's order provided for a four-hour deposition. I requested an opportunity to have some time within that four hours and we've allowed opposing counsel to use more than the four-hour time. I have probably five minutes worth of questioning and I would like an opportunity to be able to ask those questions. MR. SCOTT: We oppose that and if he does then we want to re-direct. SPECIAL MASTER: That was exactly the point. So just understand that if I do grant the extra time to Mr. Scarola of five minutes or not that they're going to get an opportunity to discuss the topics that he raises and we're going to sit here for however how long they're satisfied with those questions in the topic areas that he Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 200 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 200 raises. Do you understand that? MS. MCCAWLEY: I do. So let's take a break. It's a moment to take a break and I'll discuss with these folks and we'll come back. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record 2:25 p.m. (A recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now back on video record 2:32 p.m. SPECIAL MASTER: Just for the record, Mr. Dershowitz through counsel examined the witness for four hours and seven minutes and there was a request and it appears to be in agreement to allow. MR. SCOTT: No agreement. SPECIAL MASTER: Hang on one second. Hang on. Between Mr. Scarola and Ms. McCawley, to allow Mr. Scarola a couple questions on examination on cross and then my ruling is going to be as follows: You can go ahead and ask whatever questions you want, Mr. Scarola, at which time I will give opportunity for re-direct based upon the topics that you've raised. MR. SCAROLA: With the understanding that re-direct is going to be limited to the area of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 201 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 201 inquiry that I am about to conduct. I am about to conduct an inquiry. SPECIAL MASTER: That is the understanding. My understanding of my ruling, I know that Mr. Dershowitz' team has objected to that. I also understand that there might be -- this is no impact or their right or anybody else's right to go back to Judge Lynch and ask for more time from this witness based upon my ruling or my reading of the original order. MS. MCCAWLEY: And there's also the motion to strike the testimony that you allowed over the ruling. SPECIAL MASTER: And there's a series of those things that might need to be cleaned up in a subsequent sitting. MR. SCOTT: It's my understanding this is going to be limited to five minutes or less; is that correct? MR. SCAROLA: That's what I anticipate. MR. SCOTT: Over our objection, okay. SPECIAL MASTER: Let's rock and roll. CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Virginia, has Brad Edwards ever pressured Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 202 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 202 you or encouraged you in any way whatsoever at any time and under any circumstances to provide false information about Alan Dershowitz? A. Never. Q. Has Brad Edwards ever pressured you or encouraged you in any way or under any circumstances at any time to provide false information about Jeffrey Epstein? A. Never. Q. Has he ever pressured you or encouraged you at any time or in any way, under any circumstances to provide false information about anyone or anything? A. Never. Q. Has Paul Cassell ever pressured you or encouraged you in any way, at any time, under any circumstances to provide false information about Alan Dershowitz? A. Never. Q. Has he ever pressured or encouraged you in any way at any time, under any circumstances to provide false information about Jeffrey Epstein? A. Never. MS. BORJA: Objection. I couldn't follow who he was. BY MR. SCAROLA: Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 203 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 203 Q. Mr. Cassell, Professor Cassell? You understood that I was asking you that question about Professor Cassell, right? A. And he's never pressured me or encouraged me in any way to talk -- MS. MCCAWLEY: I don't want you to go into discussions with them if you're saying something didn't happen -- SPECIAL MASTER: Just -- MS. MCCAWLEY: I'm preserving privilege. I just want to make sure if something didn't happen she can say that. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Has Professor Cassell ever pressured you or encouraged you in any way to provide false information about anyone or anything at any time? A. Never. Q. Apart from any efforts made by Jeffrey Epstein or agents on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein to silence you or to have you refrain from providing true and accurate information about the interactions that you had with Jeffrey Epstein and others to whom you were trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, has anyone apart from that circumstance pressured you or encouraged you to provide false information about any of the topics that were Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 204 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 204 covered during the course of your examination? MS. BORJA: Objection. Objection to the form. Leading, assumes facts not in evidence, compound, misleading. SPECIAL MASTER: Your form objection will be reserved. You can answer. A. No. MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. I don't have any further questions. MR. SCOTT: Judge, excuse me, none of this was covered on direct examination so we move to exclude and strike the entire testimony because none of this was covered on our direct. But we would like to request a two-minute recess because these are completely new areas. SPECIAL MASTER: I'll grand your two-minute recess. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off video record 2:37 p.m. (A recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now back on video record 2:41 p.m. MR. SCAROLA: Could we have a reading how much time is used in my examination. SPECIAL MASTER: That's going to be Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 205 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 205 irrelevant at this point, but you can ask. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: It's going to be about eight minutes, seven minutes of change. MR. SCAROLA: Hard for me to believe that but if the counter says what the counter says. SPECIAL MASTER: The overtime got three minutes, let's go. REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. BORJA: Q. Before you were scheduled here under oath today by Mr. Scarola, did you talk to him in the break before that? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection to the extent you discussed privileged information with your lawyers you don't have to reveal. BY MS. BORJA: Q. I'm asking what she talked about with Mr. Scott? MS. MCCAWLEY: She's in a joint defense agreement with Mr. Scarola. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Are you in a joint defense agreement with Mr. Scarola? MR. SCAROLA: I will tell you that there is a joint defense, a common interest privilege Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 206 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 206 agreement between the witness and my clients, yes. SPECIAL MASTER: Are you asserting that privilege then? MR. SCAROLA: Yes, we are asserting that privilege and instructing the witness not to answer on the basis of the privilege that exists for Bradley Edwards and Professor Cassell. SPECIAL MASTER: So with that I'm going to grant the motion similar to what I did the other day when Mr. Dershowitz was testifying and under the reservation that that can be dealt with later in front of the judge or in front of me, whichever you choose. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Now, I understand from your testimony that Mr. Edwards did not pressure you to give false information about this matter, is that fair? A. That's fair. Q. Tell me everything that Mr. Edwards told you about this matter? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, that's privileged and she has not waived any privilege. She's not here testifying as to what she discussed with her lawyers. SPECIAL MASTER: You know, it's an Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 207 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 207 interesting point. I'm going to grant your motion for privilege, but I'm going to suggest to you that there might be a strong argument to be made that those questions opened some of the door. I'm going to let the judge decide that. But you can go ahead, ask the questions, we'll put it on the record for later determination, and it's going to force, to be blunt, this among other things may force the witness to come back and complete the deposition. Just let's be aware of that. MS. BORJA: And I can't make a proffer to all of my questions because some of them will depend on this witness' answers. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm aware of that. MS. BORJA: I want the record to be clear that although I'm being asked for a proffer, I'm constrained based on my inability to follow up. SPECIAL MASTER: I understand that, but I'm sure that you have a couple questions that you'd like to proffer to give the record an idea of where you might have gone without restraint to what the answer might be and then a subsequent question might lead from the answer, I understand that. BY MS. BORJA: Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 208 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 208 Q. Did Mr. Edwards ever suggest to you anything regarding Professor Dershowitz? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. Hang on, I'm objecting. She's making a proffer and I need to make my objection on the record. Do not answer. Objection, attorney/client privilege. SPECIAL MASTER: So I'm going to grant within the reservation it be brought back later. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did Paul Cassell ever tell you anything about the topics that were covered in today's deposition? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, attorney/client privilege. SPECIAL MASTER: Same ruling. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did anyone from Boise, Schiller ever tell you anything about the topics that were covered in today's deposition? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, privileged work product. SPECIAL MASTER: Same ruling. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did Mr. Scarola ever tell you anything about the topics that were covered in today's deposition? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, attorney/client Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 209 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 209 privilege. SPECIAL MASTER: Same ruling. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did the group that is Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cassell, Boise, Schiller, whether it's Ms. McCawley, or others or Jack Scarola ever tell you anything about Professor Dershowitz at all? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection, privileged information. SPECIAL MASTER: To the extent it's privileged I'll grant the motion. MS. MCCAWLEY: If you can answer that. SPECIAL MASTER: To the extent it's privileged I'll grant the motion under the same reservation. MS. MCCAWLEY: The question is, do you have any non-privileged information? You want to re-ask question. A. I don't have any non-privileged information. Q. Did they ever tell you anything before you retained them as counsel? A. No. Q. Did Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cassell, Boise, Schiller firm or Mr. SCAROLA ever tell you anything about Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 210 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 210 the circumstances of your sexual traffic, alleged sexual trafficking to other individuals such as foreign presidents? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. That would be privileged. SPECIAL MASTER: Same ruling. BY MS. BORJA: Q. Did the group that includes Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cassell, Boise Schiller, Mr. Scarola ever tell you anything with regard to any allegations of sexual abuse by Professor Dershowitz of other minors? MS. MCCAWLEY: Objection. It would be privileged. SPECIAL MASTER: I'm going to grand the same thing. Let me share with you in order to -- I do think it's unfair to have them proffer virtually every question possible because it would depend upon the potential answer. MS. MCCAWLEY: I understand. SPECIAL MASTER: If the ruling comes down that this area of inquiry for whatever reason, waive of privilege or for whatever reason is allowed to be pursued then I'm going to provide Mr. Dershowitz and his team wide latitude to follow up on the questions should we re-set and Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 211 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 211 re-visit this. MS. MCCAWLEY: I understand. MR. SCAROLA: And we'll agree that the questions that have been asked adequately -- MR. SCOTT: That's what I wanted -- MR. SCAROLA: Yes, adequately establish a record for presentation to the Court. MR. SCOTT: As long as Mr. Scarola and you agree, also, counsel? MS. MCCAWLEY: Do I agree that they adequately established a record as to what you ruled that can be presented here, yes. MR. SCOTT: Okay. So with that I think we're done. MS. BORJA: We just need to confirm that the witness is going to following the instructions of her counsel; is that correct? THE WITNESS: Yes. MR. SCOTT: Thank you, Mr. Scarola. SPECIAL MASTER: That short circuits it, I appreciate it. We're concluded. MS. BORJA: Unless I'm allowed to conduct a cross examination about the pressure that her lawyers gave her and the circumstances of that pressure and what they told her. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 212 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 212 SPECIAL MASTER: Well, obviously that would be subject to the area we just -- MS. BORJA: Then if that's -- SPECIAL MASTER: Anything else? MS. BORJA: No. I just want the record to be clear that we've been precluded about cross examination about the exact scope of the examination from Mr. Scarola regarding pressure. SPECIAL MASTER: Based upon what Mr. Scarola just agreed to and counsel just agreed to, I think that we have, and I think my rulings are also clear on the issue. MR. SCOTT: I think we're done. COURT REPORTER: Do you need this ordered? MS. BORJA: Yes. COURT REPORTER: Mr. Scarola, do you need a copy of this? MR. SCAROLA: Yes. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: That concludes the videotaped deposition. The time is 2:48 p.m. (Thereupon, the deposition was concluded at 2:48 p.m.) Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 213 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 213 CERTIFICATE OF OATH STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE, I, Deborah A. Harris, the undersigned authority and Notary Public certify that VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE personally appeared before me and was duly sworn on the 16th day of January, 2016. Sworn to before me this 20th day of January, 2016. _______________________________ Deborah A. Harris, Court Reporter Notary Public - State of Florida My Commission No. FF 246867 My Commission Expires: October 31, 2019 Job No. JO277789 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 214 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 214 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE I, Deborah A. Harris, Florida Professional Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, do hereby certify that I was authorized to and did report said deposition in stenotype; and that the foregoing pages 1 through 216 are a true and correct transcription of my shorthand notes of said deposition. I further certify that said deposition was taken at the time and place hereinabove set forth and that the taking of said deposition was commenced and completed as hereinabove set out. I further certify that I am not an attorney or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel of party connected with the action, nor am I financially interested in the action. The foregoing certification of this transcript does not apply to any reproduction of the same by any means unless under the direct control and/or direction of the certifying reporter. DATED this 20th day of January, 2016. ________________________________ Deborah A. Harris, Court Reporter Job No. JO277789 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 215 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 215 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET Assignment no: JO277789 Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz ** DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the entire transcript of my videotaped deposition taken in the captioned matter or the same has been read to me, and the same is true and accurate, save and except for changes and/or corrections, if any, as indicated by me on the DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET hereof, with the understanding that I offer these changes as if still under oath. Signed on the ______ day of ____________, 20___. ___________________________________ VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 216 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 216 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: _________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ SIGNATURE:_______________________DATE:___________ VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 217 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 217 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ Page No.____Line No._____Change to: _________________________________________________________ Reason for change: __________________________________ SIGNATURE:_______________________DATE:______________ VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 218 of 223 BO I E S, S CH I LL E R & FL E X N E R LL P 401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD • SUITE 1200 • FORT LAUDERDALE FL 3330 - 22 I • PH 954 356 001 • FAX 954 356 0022 CONFIDENTIAL/SEALED DEPOSITION SPECIAL TREATI\IENT REQUIRED February l 0, 2016 VIA E-MAIL & FEDERAL EXPRESS Esquire Solutions PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT l 01 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 errata@esguiresolutions.com Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. E-mail: smccawley(cv,bsntp.com Re: Confidential/Sealed Deposition Transcript, Job No. J02777789 (Errata changes to be treated in same manner). To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find the errata changes for the Videotaped Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken January 16, 2016. This transcript has been designated as Confidential and has been sealed by the Court. Please ensure that all materiaJs including transcript, errata changes and video tape are treated accordingly. lf you have any questions regarding the errata changes or treatment of confidential/sealed materials, please do not hesitate to contact me at (954) 356-0011. SSM:sp Enclosures Sincerely, WWW BSFLLP.COM Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 219 of 223 Confidential/Sealed Transcript Pursuant to Court Order Videotaped Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (January 16, 2016) Joh N o. J0277789 1 3 Ass i g nment no: J0277789 'i VS. 6 Alan M. D~rshowitz l s OEClARATTON U~OrR rrNAlTY or P~RJURY C) 10 r declare under penalty of perjury that I 17 deposition t~ken in rhe captioned matt~r or ~he same has l 1 b c {-) n r e ii: d t o r., e . 2. n d t r1 t2 s a tn €! i s t r u c .:i n d a c c u r il Tc , s a v e 14 and cx<{'.P1, for <_h;J,ngc·, ~nd/or· corn~<L1ons , if any. a~ ]5 indi(Jtert by ~eon the DFPOSITTON ERRATA SHEET hereof, 17 st i 11 undc r· CM th. 1 8 19 20 20 ]Li . ~, i qned on the • I J l. d.i.v of Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 220 of 223 Confidential/Sealed Transcript Pursuant to Court Order Videotaped Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (January 16, 2016) Job No. J0277789 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET Page No. 6 L1 r:e No. 17 f'hane:e to: "Yes. 1 signed the subpoena cluc,·s 1c c1101." Rec\s011 for ch:\ng~' : D id not it1 1t.ally 1·cco1u117.c th : dui.:umcnL r age J\:o. 6 Line "No. ::,o Chan!!c to: .. No. i\Iy lawyers wor kc-cl with me to cc,llcd documents and my undcrsfa ndin~ is tha l we !u rned I hose documents o,·cr to Dcn1howilL's counsel prio r lo the tlcposition.'' Reason tor change: Clarification of .inswcr Page No. 9 Lrnc No. q Chan12.e to: "\\·s." Rrnson for change: Diel nol initiall) rn:ogni1c: tl1c doc111111.:11r. Page No. I I Reason for change: Mi·rnmkrsloou th1: question Line l\os . ..J-5 C'lia11g_l'_JQ: •' J'm con fused. I d on'I know wh a t f'orl'ign prcsitknt yo 11 ' r l' talking :.ihout." Rca!->Oll for change : M isundcrstood the question Page No. 11 Lin,.; No. n ChangL· to: '·( undl·rstnnd wt•ll-1.nown prillll' minisfl>rs and olhcr " orld leade rs; as frir a.s foreign p rcsidcnls, T believe so." Rcnson for clrnngc-. !vli~u11<kr:-:ood tb.: q11.:!'t i~JJ1 Png.e No. I:.: Linc 1'1 0 . :.: Ch211!!c 10: ·' Yes, assumin g South Amc,·ica is con~itlcn•d o,·crscas.'' Reason for change: Misundt·rstood the quc-stion Page No. I :2 L ine No. 8 Ch,muc to: "As fa r as I know right now, ~·es, I w:1s. " Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 221 of 223 Confidential/Sealed Transcript Pursmml to Court Order Videotaped Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (January 16, 2016) Job No. J0277789 Reason for ckmg.e: i'vlisllnd..:rstood th<: q11csliP11 --------· .......... --------------------------------.. -----------------------------. -------------------------------------- Page 1\'o. 38 l.;11..:No. 11 Chani:!e to: '·I'll eo11ti11ul' wi01 the li~t hen•. i\':idia iVIarcinko\'a I was not S('n l to her, but she was part ofit with Jeff Ep:-.tcin. Others on the list include '\1.arvi11 Minsk,· and Tom Pritzker." • Rcuson for r.:!ian~e: C lnri lir.:a:ion of :1nswa ----------------------------------------------. --------------... ........... ·-----------------------------. --------------- Pag..: 38 Linc 19 Clrn1w.e to: ''Off the top of 111y hc,HI, once, bu t ii could ha\'r UC('ll morc." Rensen for change: C'l<1ri fication ofanswi:r ----------------· ---------------------------------.. -............. _.,.._ ----------------------------------------------------- l':1ge No. 38 l.i111.: No. 2! Change to: ''l bdicYc Tom was at Mexico. I may haYc also hcrn with him in other places.•· Reason for change: Clari!ic,11ion 01· a:1:--,., i.:r ---------------........... ·-----------------------------.... ---------------------------------------·-------.......... --------- Li::c No. 8 Cha1;:·!e 10: "On an airplane nnd inn limo.•· Pnge No. -1 l Li11i.: Nn. 10 ChanQ.c to: "One. c<1ch time:.'' Rcaso:: fo1· change: Clari !iui: iu11 of ;i1h11 er -......................... ---------------------------------------.... ------------------------........ ----.. -------------------------- Page No. 41 Linc No. 12 Chang<.' to: "Ou airplane, blond, young.'' Rc:ason ~<)r change: Clari ficaiion of n11S1~e1 ----------------------------------------,.._ ......... _ ... __ ,..,.. ____ ------------------------------------- ------------------- Pngc No. 98 I ,inc '\Jo. 16 Chani!C to: "As you can see in th:it :inswer I'm not c,·cn sure. II wasn't six months, but between six months and :1 yearn hich is why l'm sayi ng niue months. It was an assu m p1io11, Tr cou Id ha,·e hecn six "eeks." Reason ror cha11gc: Clarification ot' a11swc1· -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------......... Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 222 of 223 Confidential/Sealed Transcript Pursuant to Court Order Videotaped Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (January 16, 2016) Job No. J0277789 Change to: " ;"fo, olhcr than maybe you showing ii to me today. It's in my pile. It's no! in my pile, is it'? I don·t know. f haven ' t seen it. J was ~en c:d wilh the subpoena, :rnd I signed for· it, and [ rc\·icwt•cl it .tt that time:." Re:ison fo:· chi:nge: Clmitic11tio11 of' ans\\'c:· ___ .,.. __________ ,...., .... ----------------------------------------------·-·----------------------------------------------- Page 191 Linc 5 Change to: "\Vhy would J do - nu. f uid collcc1 tl oc11mc111s and g:1vc them rn my lawyers in response to this subpoena. And my unclcn;tandi11g i~ thost· documcn ls were producNL" Reason for change: /\ 1 is•.111dcrsi0od the question Page 19 I Linc ~o Change to: ''Yes, bu t I did not han• an~ pictu re~ of mysclf'·11 it h Profr~scir Dcrshowitz." Rc11son fu1· change· r-..lisunc!e,·stoocJ th<.: question Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 223 of 223

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJan 10, 2024

Unsealed Epstein records

Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS GIUFFRE Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.

223p
Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to Virginia Giuffre Allegations

Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap

274p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop One

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Epstein Exhibits

Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page1 of 648 EXHIBIT A Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page2 of 648 6114:2016 Prince Andrew and girl, 17, who sex o?er?er friend flew to Britain to meet him Daily Mail Ontine Daily ail .com Home I U.K. Sports Showbiz [Australia [Femail [Health [Science [Money [Video [Travel [Columnists tr am .22: ,t Latest wisestii?tr?e Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his 1 sex offender friend flew to Britain to

648p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop Three

January 5, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

1391p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.