Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-26038656Court UnsealedDeposition

Comer-letter-Ghislaine-Maxwell-deposition

Date
August 1, 2025
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-26038656
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

August 1, 2025 Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell C/O Mr. David Oscar Markus, Esq. Markus Moss PLLC 40 NW Third St., Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 Dear Ms. Maxwell: On July 23, 2025, at the direction of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Committee) issued a subpoena to you for a deposition to occur at Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee on August 11, 2025.1 Since then, the Committee and your counsel engaged in good faith negotia

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
August 1, 2025 Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell C/O Mr. David Oscar Markus, Esq. Markus Moss PLLC 40 NW Third St., Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 Dear Ms. Maxwell: On July 23, 2025, at the direction of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Committee) issued a subpoena to you for a deposition to occur at Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee on August 11, 2025.1 Since then, the Committee and your counsel engaged in good faith negotiations, including regarding the date and location of the deposition. On July 29, your counsel informed the Committee that unless several conditions were met, you would invoke your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during the Committee’s deposition.2 These conditions include: (1) a grant of immunity, (2) the deposition occurring outside of FCI Tallahassee, (3) access to the Committee’s questions in advance, and (4) the conclusion of your recent appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and potential future habeas petition.3 Your testimony is vital to the Committee’s efforts regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including the 2007 non-prosecution agreement and the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein’s death. These investigative efforts may be used to inform potential legislation to improve federal efforts to combat sex trafficking and reform the use of non-prosecution agreements and/or plea agreements in sex-crime investigations. Regarding your requested conditions, the Committee is willing to continue to engage in good faith negotiations. However, the Committee is unwilling to grant you congressional immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6005 at this time. Further, while the Committee is unwilling to send you questions in advance, the Committee will continue its long-standing practice of engaging in forthright and detailed discussions about scoping. 1 Letter from James Comer, Chairman, H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform, to Ghislaine Maxwell (July 23, 2025) (cover letter with accompanying subpoena for Ghislaine Maxwell to appear for a deposition); See e.g., Bid Protest Reform: Understanding the Problem, Hearing Before Subcomm. on Gov’t Operations, 119th Cong. 1 (July 22, 2025) (Voice Vote on Motion to Direct the Committee to Authorize and Issue a Subpoena for Ghislaine Maxwell to Appear for a Deposition). 2 Letter from David Oscar Markus, Esq., Markus Moss PLLC, to James Comer, Chairman, H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform (July 29, 2025). 3 Id. Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell August 1, 2025 Page 2 of 2 On July 30, the U.S. Supreme Court noticed that your petition for writ of certiorari will be considered at its conference on September 29. 4 In light of this notice, the Committee is willing to delay your deposition until a date following the Court’s certiorari determination. Sincerely, James Comer Chairman cc: The Honorable Robert Garcia, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 4 Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States, No. 24-1073 (U.S. July 30, 2025) (distributed for conference of Sept. 29, 2025).

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 34

The document is a compilation of court filings related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including an acknowledgment and notice of appearance by her lead counsel, David Oscar Markus, and a certification regarding a protective order in the case. It also includes a notice of appeal in a related case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARKUS / MOSS

MARKUS / MOSS July 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring to the Court's attention" an article that I wrote on June 30, 2021, and asked that the Court "issue an order pursuant to Local Rule 23.1(h)" directed at me. (Dkt. No. 309). This Court ordered that I respond (Dkt. No. 312), and I do so here. I respectfully request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARKUS / MOSS

MARKUS / MOSS July 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring to the Court's attention" an article that I wrote on June 30, 2021, and asked that the Court "issue an order pursuant to Local Rule 23.1(h)" directed at me. (Dkt. No. 309). This Court ordered that I respond (Dkt. No. 312), and I do so here. I respectfully request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 21-770, Document 17-1, 04/01/2021. 3068296. Pagel of 31

Case 21-770, Document 17-1, 04/01/2021. 3068296. Pagel of 31 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood NI ars ball U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500 MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT Docket Number(s): 21-770/21-58 Caution fuse short tilcl Millman: Pretrial Release Set forth bebw precise. complete statement of relief sough: Ghislaine Maxwell requests that this Court set reasonable bail or in the alternative, remand for an evidentiary hearing. MOVING PARTY: Ghislaine Maxwell United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell OPPOSING PARTY: United States of America DPlaintiff ODefenchnt FlAprellantPetiimer DArpelke/Respandent MOVING ATTORNEY: David Oscar Markus OPPOSING ATTORNEY: Won. S. Shin, AUSA [name of attorney. win lynx address, phone number and e-mail] Markus/Moss PLLC United States Attorney's Office, So. Dist. of NY 40 NW Third Street, PH 1, Miami, FL 33128 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10

382p
Court UnsealedApr 11, 2025

Maxwell Petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

159p
Dept. of JusticeSep 29, 2025

Ghislaine Maxwell Supreme Court petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

159p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.