Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-26289117Court Unsealed

Tennis Australia

Date
November 20, 2025
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-26289117
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

BY ECF 2001 M Street, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 +1 202 682 7000 tel +1 202 857 0940 fax Andrew S. Tulumello +1 (202) 682-7100 drew.tulumello@weil.com November 19, 2025 Hon. Margaret M. Garnett United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2102 New York, NY 10007 Re: Pospisil et al. v. ATP Tour, Inc. et al., No. 1:25-cv-02207-MMG (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judge Garnett: On behalf of Plaintiffs and Defendant Tennis Australia, Plaintiffs write to seek a stay

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
BY ECF 2001 M Street, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 +1 202 682 7000 tel +1 202 857 0940 fax Andrew S. Tulumello +1 (202) 682-7100 drew.tulumello@weil.com November 19, 2025 Hon. Margaret M. Garnett United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2102 New York, NY 10007 Re: Pospisil et al. v. ATP Tour, Inc. et al., No. 1:25-cv-02207-MMG (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judge Garnett: On behalf of Plaintiffs and Defendant Tennis Australia, Plaintiffs write to seek a stay of proceedings against Tennis Australia in the above-captioned matter. Plaintiffs and Tennis Australia are engaged in substantive and productive bi-lateral settlement discussions and believe that a settlement as to Plaintiffs’ claims against Tennis Australia is likely in the near future. Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Tennis Australia respectfully request that this Court enter an order staying all proceedings and deadlines in the case that pertain to Tennis Australia while the parties finalize their agreement. Courts in this district routinely grant stays pending settlement or mediation without further analysis where both parties request a stay. See, e.g., Jones v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., No. 23-cv-11145-MMG, Dkt. 25 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2024); Jolly v. FurtherEd, Inc., No. 24-cv-06401-LJL, Dkt. 45 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2025). In any event, a stay is warranted here because it will further the interests of judicial economy and efficiency and will facilitate the final resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims against Tennis Australia. See Melville v. HOP Energy, LLC, 2024 WL 4224850, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. 2024). The stay request applies only to Tennis Australia and no other Defendant. Respectfully submitted, Andrew S. Tulumello Andrew S. Tulumello Counsel for Plaintiffs cc: all counsel of record (via ECF) Case 1:25-cv-02207-MMG Document 170 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 1

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' yt To: ' .111r)a.r>alSANYS)" )" Cc: ' (CRM)" czi Subject: RE: SDNY case Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:46:21 +0000 Dea I heard you defeated the bail proposal. Congrats! My meeting with the Paris Prosecutor's Office was pushed by a day, and is now set for January 7th. Can we pick a time for a call between now and then? Would Tuesday the 5th in the am (NY time) work for everyone? In the meantime, I am referring the French MLAT request to your IC ). I don't know if you have any privilege issues in your case...and I don't see anything in the request that would revealed any privileged info. But I wanted to mention, in case anyone needs to screen it before it comes to you. If not, I can send it to you directly as well. DOJ Attache/Magistrat de liaison anthicain U.S. Embassy, Paris From: Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 6:03 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (CRM) < Subject: RE: SDNY case Hi all, (CRM) Maxwell's attorneys filed the attached supplemental report from their French

12p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "

From: " :1" To:' Subject: accessory Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000 Embedded: possible_guidelines_calculation.msg Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements: First, that the crime of [specify crime' alleged in the Indictment was committed by 'specify offenderl; Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender's' participation in it: Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted 'the offender' with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender's' apprehension, trial or punishment. The punishment is: an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment [. . .]; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. One-half the maximum term of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking being, of course, a cap of 2.5 years.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department ofJustiee United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Bullefing One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 August 19, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: As the Court is aware, on the morning of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. On August 16, 2019, and after conducting an autopsy, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York issued a statement identifying the cause of death as hanging, and the manner of death as suicide. In light of the death of the defendant prior to a conviction becoming final, the Government must request the Court approve the attached proposed or

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regardin...

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, arguing that the defendant's request for early disclosure is not justified and that the court's current plan for juror name disclosure is sufficient. The government contends that the defendant is seeking extra time to conduct research on prospective jurors without a valid reason. The government's response cites relevant case law and the court's previous orders to support its position.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.