Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-2781011Court Unsealed

Plea-Agreement

Date
March 31, 2016
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-2781011
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

I JUS~ICE COURT . ' . , Plea agreement ac ~'~p'-ted •. t.f .luuge ~ ,r-m/tvr-« Cochise County, AnZJ1lil~. Precinct FIVE I ": ----...\L.~~~=_.....-. I TR2015-00633 State of Arizona. Plaintiff. v. PLEA AGREEMENT JOSEPH HALDOR ARNASON. Defendant. The State of Arizona and the defendant agree to the following disposition of this case: Terms: On the following understanding, terms and conditions: . Plea: The defendant agrees to plead guilty to: A.R.S. 28-1381 (A)(1), driving under the influe

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
I JUS~ICE COURT . ' . , Plea agreement ac ~'~p'-ted •. t.f .luuge ~ ,r-m/tvr-« Cochise County, AnZJ1lil~. Precinct FIVE I ": ----...\L.~~~=_.....-. I TR2015-00633 State of Arizona. Plaintiff. v. PLEA AGREEMENT JOSEPH HALDOR ARNASON. Defendant. The State of Arizona and the defendant agree to the following disposition of this case: Terms: On the following understanding, terms and conditions: . Plea: The defendant agrees to plead guilty to: A.R.S. 28-1381 (A)(1), driving under the influence. a class one misdemeanor 1. That the defendant will receive a sentence of no greater than 6 MONTHS JAIL. 3 YEARS PROBATION, $2500 FINE PLUS SURCHARGE OF 83% and no less than SUSPENDED SENTENCE and consistent with the following additional terms. STIPULATION: FINE: $1667 JAIL: 10 days, with 9 days suspended upon condition the Defendant complies with the remainder of the sentence OTHER: Alcohol screening/counseling and MADD Victim Impact Panel 2. That the following charges are dismissed, or if not yet filed, shall not be brought against the defendant: All charges remaining open on are dismissed for the reason that Defendant is pleading guilty to DUI. 3. That this agreement, unless rejected or withdrawn, serves to amend the complaint; indictment or information to charge the offense to which the defendant pleads, without the filing of an additional pleading. If the plea is rejected or withdrawn. the original charges are automatically reinstated. 4. Unless this plea is rejected or withdrawn, that the defendant hereby gives up any and all motions, defenses, objections, or requests which he has made or raised, or could assert hereafter, to the court's entry of judgment against him and imposition of a sentence upon him consistent with this agreement. 5. That if after accepting this agreement the court concludes that any of its provisions regarding the sentence or the term and conditions of probation are inappropriate, it can reject the plea, giving the defendant an opportunity to withdraw the plea. <> 6. PROBATION: I understand that, if I am granted probation by the court as part of this plea agreement, the terms and conditions of probation are subject to modification at any time during the period of probation if I violate any written condition of my probation. I understand that if I am presently on probation, a plea of guilty or no contest in this matter may lead to the revocation or modification of that probation. 7. IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES: I understand that if I am not a citizen of the United States, pleading guilty or no contest in this plea agreement may have immigration consequences. Admitting guilt may result in deportation even if this charge is later dismissed. I understand that my plea or admission of guilt could result in my deportation or removal, could prevent me from ever beinq-able to get legal status in the United States, or could prevent me from becoming a United States citizen. I agree to enter my plea as indicated above on the terms and conditions set forth herein. I have read and understand the above. I have discussed the case and my constitutional rights with a lawyer and understand them. If I do not have an attorney, I understand that by pleading guilty/no contest/responsible I will be giving up my right to a trial. to confront. crossexamine. and compel attendance of witnesses. as well as my privilege against self-incrimination. NOTICE OF DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE: I understand that 90 days from my sentencing date any and all items or property held as evidence for the prosecution for the above listed case will be released or destroyed pursuant to the policies of the agency holding the evidence. I und t d that it' my responsibility to contact the agency to retrieve property prior to disposal. o 3/:<JI /6 DATE I have discussed this case with my client in detail and advised him of his constitutional rights and all possible defenses. I believe that the plea and disposition set forth herein are appropriate under the facts of this case. I concur in the entry of the plea as indicated above and on the terms and 5- ~-4?~ :;:seU~ ~COUNSEL DATE I have reviewed this matte&~lea P~CfUTOfJ ) and disposition set forth herein are appropriate and are in the interests of justice. DATl/2X//y,

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' yt To: ' .111r)a.r>alSANYS)" )" Cc: ' (CRM)" czi Subject: RE: SDNY case Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:46:21 +0000 Dea I heard you defeated the bail proposal. Congrats! My meeting with the Paris Prosecutor's Office was pushed by a day, and is now set for January 7th. Can we pick a time for a call between now and then? Would Tuesday the 5th in the am (NY time) work for everyone? In the meantime, I am referring the French MLAT request to your IC ). I don't know if you have any privilege issues in your case...and I don't see anything in the request that would revealed any privileged info. But I wanted to mention, in case anyone needs to screen it before it comes to you. If not, I can send it to you directly as well. DOJ Attache/Magistrat de liaison anthicain U.S. Embassy, Paris From: Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 6:03 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (CRM) < Subject: RE: SDNY case Hi all, (CRM) Maxwell's attorneys filed the attached supplemental report from their French

12p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "

From: " :1" To:' Subject: accessory Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000 Embedded: possible_guidelines_calculation.msg Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements: First, that the crime of [specify crime' alleged in the Indictment was committed by 'specify offenderl; Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender's' participation in it: Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted 'the offender' with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender's' apprehension, trial or punishment. The punishment is: an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment [. . .]; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. One-half the maximum term of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking being, of course, a cap of 2.5 years.

1p
OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department ofJustiee United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Bullefing One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 August 19, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: As the Court is aware, on the morning of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. On August 16, 2019, and after conducting an autopsy, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York issued a statement identifying the cause of death as hanging, and the manner of death as suicide. In light of the death of the defendant prior to a conviction becoming final, the Government must request the Court approve the attached proposed or

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regardin...

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, arguing that the defendant's request for early disclosure is not justified and that the court's current plan for juror name disclosure is sufficient. The government contends that the defendant is seeking extra time to conduct research on prospective jurors without a valid reason. The government's response cites relevant case law and the court's previous orders to support its position.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.